Literature DB >> 20919969

E-health in Australia: time to plunge into the 21st century.

Christopher Pearce1, Mukesh C Haikerwal.   

Abstract

E-health is the health care buzzword of the moment, with a person-controlled electronic health record funded in the 2010 federal Budget and legislation to introduce health identifiers recently passed by Parliament. E-health can ease the patient journey, improve quality of care and reduce costs. Australia's health care system lags behind all other sectors of our economy in the use of computerised systems. While general practice and community pharmacy are highly computerised, the hospital sector is not. Adopting e-health is likely to result in higher quality practice, but general practice and hospitals need a mechanism for securely sharing patient data. Uncoordinated implementation of differing, incompatible systems within and between hospitals compounds a dire lack of national coordination of effort. Multiple funding streams and jurisdictions and the lack of an implementation strategy have slowed e-health development. Government programs underestimate the costs of change management and the need for training and technology. Confusion reigns about responsibilities, but governments must ensure connectivity between health care providers and recognise that the benefits will accrue into the future. The National E-Health Transition Authority has developed national open-access standards, and its foundation projects and the National Broadband Network are now coming into place. To ensure the clinical relevance, utility, safety and acceptability of e-health systems, health professionals urgently need technical capacity and expert guidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20919969     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03967.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  6 in total

1.  POLAR Diversion: Using General Practice Data to Calculate Risk of Emergency Department Presentation at the Time of Consultation.

Authors:  Christopher Pearce; Adam McLeod; Natalie Rinehart; Jon Patrick; Anna Fragkoudi; Jason Ferrigi; Elizabeth Deveny; Robin Whyte; Marianne Shearer
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Addressing the Challenges of Electronic Health Records Using Blockchain and IPFS.

Authors:  Iris Cathrina Abacan Pilares; Sami Azam; Serkan Akbulut; Mirjam Jonkman; Bharanidharan Shanmugam
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  A personally controlled electronic health record for Australia.

Authors:  Christopher Pearce; Michael Bainbridge
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Error rates in a clinical data repository: lessons from the transition to electronic data transfer--a descriptive study.

Authors:  Matthew K H Hong; Henry H I Yao; John S Pedersen; Justin S Peters; Anthony J Costello; Declan G Murphy; Christopher M Hovens; Niall M Corcoran
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  SafeSpace: what is the feasibility and acceptability of a codesigned virtual reality intervention, incorporating compassionate mind training, to support people undergoing cancer treatment in a clinical setting?

Authors:  Geraldine O'Gara; Lisa Murray; Sofia Georgopoulou; Tim Anstiss; Andrew Macquarrie; Pete Wheatstone; Barbie Bellman; Paul Gilbert; Anthony Steed; Theresa Wiseman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Electronic health records: a new tool to combat chronic kidney disease?

Authors:  Sankar D Navaneethan; Stacey E Jolly; John Sharp; Anil Jain; Jesse D Schold; Martin J Schreiber; Joseph V Nally
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.975

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.