Literature DB >> 20919631

The ecological impact of invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) in Australia.

Richard Shine1.   

Abstract

Although invasive species are viewed as major threats to ecosystems worldwide, few such species have been studied in enough detail to identify the pathways, magnitudes, and timescales of their impact on native fauna. One of the most intensively studied invasive taxa in this respect is the cane toad (Bufo marinus), which was introduced to Australia in 1935. A review of these studies suggests that a single pathway-lethal toxic ingestion of toads by frog-eating predators-is the major mechanism of impact, but that the magnitude of impact varies dramatically among predator taxa, as well as through space and time. Populations of large predators (e.g., varanid and scincid lizards, elapid snakes, freshwater crocodiles, and dasyurid marsupials) may be imperilled by toad invasion, but impacts vary spatially even within the same predator species. Some of the taxa severely impacted by toad invasion recover within a few decades, via aversion learning and longer-term adaptive changes. No native species have gone extinct as a result of toad invasion, and many native taxa widely imagined to be at risk are not affected, largely as a result of their physiological ability to tolerate toad toxins (e.g., as found in many birds and rodents), as well as the reluctance of many native anuran-eating predators to consume toads, either innately or as a learned response. Indirect effects of cane toads as mediated through trophic webs are likely as important as direct effects, but they are more difficult to study. Overall, some Australian native species (mostly large predators) have declined due to cane toads; others, especially species formerly consumed by those predators, have benefited. For yet others, effects have been minor or have been mediated indirectly rather than through direct interactions with the invasive toads. Factors that increase a predator's vulnerability to toad invasion include habitat overlap with toads, anurophagy, large body size, inability to develop rapid behavioral aversion to toads as prey items, and physiological vulnerability to bufotoxins as a result of a lack of coevolutionary history of exposure to other bufonid taxa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20919631     DOI: 10.1086/655116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q Rev Biol        ISSN: 0033-5770            Impact factor:   4.875


  71 in total

1.  Influence of lung parasites on the growth rates of free-ranging and captive adult cane toads.

Authors:  Crystal Kelehear; Gregory P Brown; Richard Shine
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Mixed population genomics support for the central marginal hypothesis across the invasive range of the cane toad (Rhinella marina) in Australia.

Authors:  Daryl R Trumbo; Brendan Epstein; Paul A Hohenlohe; Ross A Alford; Lin Schwarzkopf; Andrew Storfer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Embryonic exposure to conspecific chemicals suppresses cane toad growth and survival.

Authors:  Michael R Crossland; Richard Shine
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  The Genome 10K Project: a way forward.

Authors:  Klaus-Peter Koepfli; Benedict Paten; Stephen J O'Brien
Journal:  Annu Rev Anim Biosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 8.923

5.  Invasive species as drivers of evolutionary change: cane toads in tropical Australia.

Authors:  Richard Shine
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Ectoparasite extinction in simplified lizard assemblages during experimental island invasion.

Authors:  Christian L Cox; Sean Alexander; Brianna Casement; Albert K Chung; John David Curlis; Zachariah Degon; Madeline Dubois; Cleo Falvey; Zackary A Graham; Edita Folfas; Maria A Gallegos Koyner; Lauren K Neel; Daniel J Nicholson; Dylan J Padilla Perez; Xochitl Ortiz-Ross; Adam A Rosso; Quinn Taylor; Timothy J Thurman; Claire E Williams; W Owen McMillan; Michael L Logan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Chronic exposure to a glyphosate-based herbicide makes toad larvae more toxic.

Authors:  Veronika Bókony; Zsanett Mikó; Ágnes M Móricz; Dániel Krüzselyi; Attila Hettyey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The perils of paradise: an endangered species conserved on an island loses antipredator behaviours within 13 generations.

Authors:  Chris J Jolly; Jonathan K Webb; Ben L Phillips
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Competition and pesticide exposure affect development of invasive (Rhinella marina) and native (Fejervarya vittigera) rice paddy amphibian larvae.

Authors:  Molly E Shuman-Goodier; Grant R Singleton; Catherine R Propper
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Does human-induced habitat modification influence the impact of introduced species? A case study on cavity-nesting by the introduced common myna (Acridotheres tristis) and two Australian native parrots.

Authors:  Kate Grarock; David B Lindenmayer; Jeffrey T Wood; Christopher R Tidemann
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.