Literature DB >> 20919522

Minimally invasive thyroid and parathyroid operations: surgical techniques and pearls.

Brian Hung-hin Lang1.   

Abstract

With advances in technology and greater demand for minimally invasive procedures, novel minimally invasive approaches to thyroid and parathyroid glands increasingly have been described and practiced worldwide. For the MIT approaches, the direct/cervical approaches truly can be considered minimally invasive, as they require less surgical dissection than the conventional thyroidectomy. The indirect/extracervical approaches, however, only can be considered endoscopic, however, because they generally do require greater surgical dissection. Still, among the indirect/extracervical approaches, the axillary approach appears the preferred choice, as it requires the least amount of dissection while offering the advantage of being scarless in the neck. The addition of the robot such as the de Vinci surgical system could make some of the extracervical approaches technically less challenging and improve patient outcomes. Unlike MIT, MIP has become the standard approach for surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism caused by localized solitary parathyroid adenoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20919522     DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2010.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Surg        ISSN: 0065-3411


  9 in total

Review 1.  Gasless trans-axillary robotic thyroidectomy: the technique and evidence.

Authors:  Hassan A Alzahrani; Khuzema Mohsin; Daniah Bu Ali; Fadi Murad; Emad Kandil
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-06

2.  Comparison of surgical outcome between conventional open thyroidectomy and endoscopic thyroidectomy through axillo-breast approach.

Authors:  Kian-Hwee Chong; Ming-Hsun Wu; Chieh-Wen Lai
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-11-20

3.  A survey of preferences regarding surgical approach to thyroid surgery.

Authors:  Nicholas E Coorough; David F Schneider; Monica Woll Rosen; Rebecca S Sippel; Herbert Chen; Margaret L Schwarze; Haggi Mazeh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  A review of risk factors and timing for postoperative hematoma after thyroidectomy: is outpatient thyroidectomy really safe?

Authors:  Brian Hung-Hin Lang; Patricia Chun-Ling Yih; Chung-Yau Lo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  A comparison of surgical outcomes between endoscopic and robotically assisted thyroidectomy: the authors' initial experience.

Authors:  Brian Hung-Hin Lang; Man-Po Chow
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Transaxillary robotic-assisted thyroid surgery: technique and results of a preliminary experience on the Da Vinci Xi platform.

Authors:  Francesco Paolo Prete; Rinaldo Marzaioli; Serafina Lattarulo; Daniele Paradies; Graziana Barile; Maria Vittoria d'Addetta; Giovanni Tomasicchio; Angela Gurrado; Angela Pezzolla
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 7.  Endoscopic thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Xiaodong Gu; Xiaoxiao Wang; Jianbin Xiang; Zongyou Chen
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-12-11

8.  A comparison of surgical morbidity and scar appearance between gasless, transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy (GTET) and minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (VAT).

Authors:  Brian Hung-Hin Lang; Kai-Pun Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Robotic versus Open Thyroidectomy for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: An Evidence-Based Review.

Authors:  Shirley Yuk Wah Liu; Enders Kwok Wai Ng
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.257

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.