Literature DB >> 20890769

The OECD validation program of the H295R steroidogenesis assay: Phase 3. Final inter-laboratory validation study.

Markus Hecker1, Henner Hollert, Ralph Cooper, Anne Marie Vinggaard, Yumi Akahori, Margaret Murphy, Christine Nellemann, Eric Higley, John Newsted, John Laskey, Angela Buckalew, Stefanie Grund, Sibylle Maletz, John Giesy, Gary Timm.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND, GOALS, AND SCOPE: In response to increasing concerns regarding the potential of chemicals to interact with the endocrine system of humans and wildlife, various national and international programs have been initiated with the aim to develop new guidelines for the screening and testing of these chemicals in vertebrates. Here, we report on the validation of an in vitro assay, the H295R steroidogenesis assay, to detect chemicals with the potential to inhibit or induce the production of the sex steroid hormones testosterone (T) and 17β-estradiol (E2) in preparation for the development of an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) test guideline.
METHODS: A previously optimized and pre-validated protocol was used to assess the potential of 28 chemicals of diverse structures and properties to validate the H295R steroidogenesis assay. These chemicals are comprised of known endocrine-active chemicals and "negative" chemicals that were not expected to have effects on the targeted endpoints, as well as a number of test chemicals with unknown modes of action at the level of the steroidogenic pathway. A total of seven laboratories from seven countries participated in this effort. In addition to effects on hormone production, confounding factors, such as cell viability and possible direct interference of test substances with antibody-based hormone detection assays, were assessed. Prior to and during the conduct of exposure experiments, each laboratory had to demonstrate that they were able to conduct the assay within the margin of predefined performance criteria.
RESULTS: With a few exceptions, all laboratories met the key quality performance parameters, and only 2% and 7% of all experiments for T and E2, respectively, were excluded due to exceedance of these parameters. Of the 28 chemicals analyzed, 13 and 14 tested affected production of T and E2, respectively, while 11 and 8 did not result in significant effects on T and E2 production, respectively. Four and six chemicals produced ambiguous results for effects on T and E2 production, respectively. However, four of these cases each for T and E2 were associated with only one laboratory after a personnel change occurred. Significant interference of test chemicals with some of the antibody-based hormone detection systems occurred for four chemicals. Only one of these chemicals, however, significantly affected the ability of the detection system to categorize the chemical as affecting E2 or T production. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: With one exception, the H295R steroidogenesis assay protocol successfully identified the majority of chemicals with known and unknown modes of interaction as inducers or inhibitors of T and E2 production. Thus it can be considered a reliable screen for chemicals that can alter the production of sex steroid hormones. One of the remaining limitations associated with the H295R steroidogenesis assay protocol is the relatively small basal production of E2 and its effect on quantifying the decreased production of this hormone with regard to the identification of weak inhibitors. An initial comparison of the data produced in this study with those from in vivo studies from the literature demonstrated the potential of the H295R steroidogenesis assay to identify chemicals affecting hormone homeostasis in whole organisms. Particularly promising was the lack of any false negatives during the validation and the very low number of false positives (1 out of 28 chemicals for each T and E2). PERSPECTIVES: Based on the results obtained during this validation study and the accordingly revised test protocols, an OECD draft test guideline was developed and submitted to the OECD working group of the national coordinators of the test guidelines program (WNT) for comments in December 2009.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20890769     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-010-0396-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  42 in total

1.  Effects of the pesticides carbofuran, chlorpyrifos, dimethoate, lindane, triallate, trifluralin, 2,4-D, and pentachlorophenol on the metabolic endocrine and reproductive endocrine system in ewes.

Authors:  N C Rawlings; S J Cook; D Waldbillig
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  1998-05-08

2.  The relative bioavailability and metabolism of bisphenol A in rats is dependent upon the route of administration.

Authors:  L H Pottenger; J Y Domoradzki; D A Markham; S C Hansen; S Z Cagen; J M Waechter
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Selective destruction and regeneration of rat Leydig cells in vivo. A new method for the study of seminiferous tubular-interstitial tissue interaction.

Authors:  J B Kerr; K Donachie; F F Rommerts
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  Effects of two fungicides with multiple modes of action on reproductive endocrine function in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas).

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Kathleen M Jensen; Elizabeth J Durhan; Elizabeth A Makynen; Brian C Butterworth; Michael D Kahl; Daniel L Villeneuve; Ann Linnum; L Earl Gray; Mary Cardon; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons inhibit in vitro ovarian steroidogenesis in the flounder (Platichthys flesus L.).

Authors: 
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Simultaneous quantification of multiple classes of phenolic compounds in blood plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Hong Chang; Yi Wan; Jonathan Naile; Xiaowei Zhang; Steve Wiseman; Markus Hecker; Michael H W Lam; John P Giesy; Paul D Jones
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 4.759

7.  Effects of neonatal exposure to 4-tert-octylphenol, diethylstilbestrol, and flutamide on steroidogenesis in infantile rat testis.

Authors:  Tiina F M Mikkilä; Jorma Toppari; Jorma Paranko
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Alterations in saliva steroid hormone levels after oral mifepristone administration in women with pregnancies of greater than 41 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Michael J Fassett; Gillian C L Lachelin; Hugh H G McGarrigle; Deborah A Wing
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.060

9.  Do parabens have the ability to interfere with steroidogenesis?

Authors:  Camilla Taxvig; Anne Marie Vinggaard; Ulla Hass; Marta Axelstad; Julie Boberg; Pernille Reimer Hansen; Hanne Frederiksen; Christine Nellemann
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Effects of atrazine on sex steroid dynamics, plasma vitellogenin concentration and gonad development in adult goldfish (Carassius auratus).

Authors:  Laura Spanò; Charles R Tyler; Ronny van Aerle; Pierre Devos; S N M Mandiki; Frédéric Silvestre; Jean-Pierre Thomé; Patrick Kestemont
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 4.964

View more
  13 in total

1.  Machine learning reveals sex-specific 17β-estradiol-responsive expression patterns in white perch (Morone americana) plasma proteins.

Authors:  Justin Schilling; Angelito I Nepomuceno; Antonio Planchart; Jeffrey A Yoder; Robert M Kelly; David C Muddiman; Harry V Daniels; Naoshi Hiramatsu; Benjamin J Reading
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  A hierarchical testing strategy for micropollutants in drinking water regarding their potential endocrine-disrupting effects-towards health-related indicator values.

Authors:  Jochen Kuckelkorn; Regine Redelstein; Timon Heide; Jennifer Kunze; Sibylle Maletz; Petra Waldmann; Tamara Grummt; Thomas-Benjamin Seiler; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Identification of candidate reference chemicals for in vitro steroidogenesis assays.

Authors:  Caroline Lucia Pinto; Kristan Markey; David Dix; Patience Browne
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  The use of purified rat Leydig cells complements the H295R screen to detect chemical-induced alterations in testosterone production.

Authors:  Nicole L Botteri Principato; Juan D Suarez; Susan C Laws; Gary R Klinefelter
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  Absence of glyphosate-induced effects on ovarian folliculogenesis and steroidogenesis.

Authors:  Shanthi Ganesan; Bailey C McGuire; Aileen F Keating
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.143

6.  High-Throughput Screening of Chemical Effects on Steroidogenesis Using H295R Human Adrenocortical Carcinoma Cells.

Authors:  Agnes L Karmaus; Colleen M Toole; Dayne L Filer; Kenneth C Lewis; Matthew T Martin
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Supporting read-across using biological data.

Authors:  Hao Zhu; Mounir Bouhifd; Elizabeth Donley; Laura Egnash; Nicole Kleinstreuer; E Dinant Kroese; Zhichao Liu; Thomas Luechtefeld; Jessica Palmer; David Pamies; Jie Shen; Volker Strauss; Shengde Wu; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 6.043

8.  Development of a prioritization method for chemical-mediated effects on steroidogenesis using an integrated statistical analysis of high-throughput H295R data.

Authors:  Derik E Haggard; R Woodrow Setzer; Richard S Judson; Katie Paul Friedman
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Application of an in Vitro Assay to Identify Chemicals That Increase Estradiol and Progesterone Synthesis and Are Potential Breast Cancer Risk Factors.

Authors:  Bethsaida Cardona; Ruthann A Rudel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Effects of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and triclocarban on several eukaryotic cell lines: elucidating cytotoxicity, endocrine disruption, and reactive oxygen species generation.

Authors:  Anne Simon; Sibylle X Maletz; Henner Hollert; Andreas Schäffer; Hanna M Maes
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.