Literature DB >> 20890134

Between youth and adulthood: focus group discussions with 30-year-old women about cervical cancer and its prevention in urban Sweden.

Karin Blomberg1, Catarina Widmark, Britt-Marie Ternestedt, Sven Törnberg, Carol Tishelman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although there is a significant amount of research on cervical cancer screening (CCS), few studies address screening experiences of women related to reasoning about health maintenance and disease prevention in general. Research tends to neglect experiences in different phases of life and experiences of women with different screening histories. Recent literature primarily focuses on adolescents targeted for human papilloma virus vaccinations, whereas perspectives of women who need continued CCS are lacking.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore how 30-year-old women reason about health, ill health, health maintenance, and disease prevention, in relation to cervical cancer, its prevention, and screening.
METHODS: Through a population-based CCS registry, we randomly sampled women to attend focus group discussions stratified by previous patterns in screening history and test results. Data from 38 attendees were inductively analyzed.
RESULTS: Women's discussions encompassed temporal aspects of the past and the future, with youth in the rearview mirror and the demands of adulthood ahead. Matters related to sickness, including cancer and its prevention, were described as distant and not prioritized in this phase of life. This situation was compounded by lack of relevant information about cervical cancer and screening.
CONCLUSIONS: The manner 30-year-old women self-defined themselves in the transition between youth and adulthood appears to strongly influence their reasoning about CCS and other forms of health maintenance and disease prevention. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Cervical cancer screening programs are challenged to adapt both information and organizations to new cohorts of women with different needs and life situations.
© 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20890134     DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181f70f83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Nurs        ISSN: 0162-220X            Impact factor:   2.592


  4 in total

1.  When Life Got in the Way: How Danish and Norwegian Immigrant Women in Sweden Reason about Cervical Screening and Why They Postpone Attendance.

Authors:  Fatima Azerkan; Catarina Widmark; Pär Sparén; Elisabete Weiderpass; Per Tillgren; Elisabeth Faxelid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Quality of life and trust among young people with narcolepsy and their families, after the Pandemrix® vaccination: protocol for a case-control study.

Authors:  Karin Blomberg; Agneta Anderzén Carlsson; Lars Hagberg; Östen Jonsson; Lena Leissner; Mats H Eriksson
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.125

3.  Barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening among adolescents and young people: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abirami Kirubarajan; Shannon Leung; Xinglin Li; Matthew Yau; Mara Sobel
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 4.  Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.

Authors:  Amanda J Chorley; Laura A V Marlow; Alice S Forster; Jessica B Haddrell; Jo Waller
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.894

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.