Literature DB >> 20890076

Determination of the prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistances in patients with coronary artery disease by using various platelet-function tests.

Kwang-Sook Woo1, Bo-Ram Kim, Ji-Eun Kim, Ri-Young Goh, Long-Hao Yu, Moo-Hyun Kim, Jin-Yeong Han.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dual therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel has emerged as the gold standard therapy for patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES). However, there is variability in patients' responses to this antiplatelet therapy, and some patients continue to show ischemic recurrences after therapy. The purpose of the study was to compare the simultaneously obtained results of various platelet-function tests for assessing the prevalence of antiplatelet resistance in coronary artery disease patients undergoing DES therapy.
METHODS: A total of 66 patients were administered a loading dose of aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol at least 12 hr before stenting. The results of VerifyNow (Accumetrics, USA), multiplate analyzer (Dynabyte Medical, Germany), and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein/P2Y12 (Biocytex, France) assays were compared with those of light transmission aggregometry (LTA) analysis.
RESULTS: The P2Y12 reaction units and P2Y12% inhibition values obtained using the VerifyNow assay showed strong correlation (r) with the results of the LTA analysis. All tests results showed low concordance in defining the antiplatelet resistance in patients, and the degrees of agreement were as follows: 0 for aspirin reaction units; 0.25, P2Y12% inhibition; 0, aspirin-sensitive patients' identification test; 0.21, ADPtest; and 0.14, platelet reactivity index, expressed as the κ statistics. The prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistances in patients resulted in remarkable variations, from 0% to 22.7% and from 9.1% to 48.5%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical usefulness of the different assays for the correct classification of patients in terms of antiplatelet resistance remains unclear. Further studies are required to determine the best method for correlating the occurrences of adverse ischemic events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20890076     DOI: 10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.5.460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Lab Med        ISSN: 1598-6535


  6 in total

1.  Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) gene variants are not associated with clopidogrel response.

Authors:  J P Lewis; A S Fisch; K Ryan; J R O'Connell; Q Gibson; B D Mitchell; H Shen; K Tanner; R B Horenstein; R Pakzy; U S Tantry; K P Bliden; P A Gurbel; A R Shuldiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  A comparison of INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y and VerifyNow P2Y12 assay for the assessment of clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jiyoung Jang; Jihyang Lim; Kiyuk Chang; Yonggoo Kim; Myungshin Kim; Hae Il Park; Jayoung Kim; Soyoung Shin
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Impact of platelet function test on platelet responsiveness and clinical outcome after coronary stent implantation: platelet responsiveness and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Long Hao Yu; Moo Hyun Kim; Hong Zhe Zhang; Jong Seong Park; Tae Ho Park; Young Dae Kim; Kwang Soo Cha; Jin Yeong Han
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 4.  Platelet Activation: The Mechanisms and Potential Biomarkers.

Authors:  Seong-Hoon Yun; Eun-Hye Sim; Ri-Young Goh; Joo-In Park; Jin-Yeong Han
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Endothelial dysfunction and platelet hyperactivity in type 2 diabetes mellitus: molecular insights and therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Raminderjit Kaur; Manpreet Kaur; Jatinder Singh
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 9.951

Review 6.  Platelet function tests: a review of progresses in clinical application.

Authors:  Jae-Lim Choi; Shuhua Li; Jin-Yeong Han
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.