Literature DB >> 20889990

Prognosis of octogenarians with severe aortic valve stenosis at high risk for cardiovascular surgery.

Robert Schueler1, Christoph Hammerstingl, Jan-Malte Sinning, Georg Nickenig, Heyder Omran.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Calcified aortic valve stenosis (AVS) is a disease found in the elderly which is often complicated by severe co-morbidities. AIMS: To assess the survival of conservatively treated patients >75 years with severe AVS compared to patients with non-severe AVS but who have a similar clinical risk profile; and to identify risk factors affecting prognosis. METHODS AND
RESULTS: From 2002 to 2006, 161 patients (mean age 86±7.7 years) were studied: 79 with aortic valve area (AVA) <1 cm(2) (group A), 82 with AVA ≥1 cm(2) (group B). Cumulative mortality rates were 77.5% in group A, and 44.4% in group B. Survival rates at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months in groups A and B were: 70.9% versus 98.8%, 65.8% versus 84.1%, 49.4% versus 69.5% and 41.8% versus 59.8%, respectively. Independent predictors for death in group A were pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), the STS-PROM score, serum creatinine and diabetes. PAP >30 mm Hg identified patients at high mortality risk. In group B the predictive variables were ejection fraction, PAP, serum creatinine, and treatment with β-blockers or ACE inhibitors.
CONCLUSION: Severe aortic valve stenosis is a medical condition with limited short-term survival in patients over the age of 75 years at high surgical risk. Clinical variables rather than symptomatic status were able to predict the patients' outcome. Patients with the highest surgical risk have the worst prognosis if AVS is not treated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20889990     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2010.202663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  5 in total

1.  Functional independence measure for elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Masaaki Ryomoto; Masataka Mitsuno; Mitsuhiro Yamamura; Hiroe Tanaka; Shinya Fukui; Tetsuya Kajiyama; Ayaka Satou; Yuji Miyamoto; Domen Kazuhisa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-08-02

2.  Changing nature of cardiac interventions in older adults.

Authors:  John A Dodson; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  Aging health       Date:  2011-04

3.  Evaluation of YouTube as a reliable source for patient education on aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Charl Khalil; Michael Megaly; Catherine Ekladios; Amira Ibrahim; Wassim Mosleh; Mariam Tawadros; Yan Yatsynovich; Tharmathai Ramanan; Mina Youssef; Nader Hanna; Mofid Khalil; Karim M Al-Azizi; Fadi Shamoun; Brian Page; John Corbelli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-08

Review 4.  Evolving Devices and Material in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: What to Use and for Whom.

Authors:  Mauro Chiarito; Alessandro Spirito; Johny Nicolas; Alexandra Selberg; Giulio Stefanini; Antonio Colombo; Bernhard Reimers; Annapoorna Kini; Samin K Sharma; George D Dangas; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Eliciting Patient Risk Willingness in Clinical Consultations as a Means of Improving Decision-Making of Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Amjad I Hussain; Andrew M Garratt; Cathrine Brunborg; Svend Aakhus; Lars Gullestad; Kjell I Pettersen
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.