MOTIVATION: Adjustment for population structure is necessary to avoid bias in genetic association studies of susceptibility variants for complex diseases. Population structure may differ from one genomic region to another due to the variability of individual ancestry associated with migration, random genetic drift or natural selection. Current association methods for correcting population stratification usually involve adjustment of global ancestry between study subjects. RESULTS: We suggest interrogating local population structure for fine mapping to more accurately locate true casual genes by better adjusting the confounding effect due to local ancestry. By extensive simulations on genome-wide datasets, we show that adjusting global ancestry may lead to false positives when local population structure is an important confounding factor. In contrast, adjusting local ancestry can effectively prevent false positives due to local population structure and thus can improve fine mapping for disease gene localization. We applied the local and global adjustments to the analysis of datasets from three genome-wide association studies, including European Americans, African Americans and Nigerians. Both European Americans and African Americans demonstrate greater variability in local ancestry than Nigerians. Adjusting local ancestry successfully eliminated the known spurious association between SNPs in the LCT gene and height due to the population structure existed in European Americans. CONTACT: xiaofeng.zhu@case.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: Adjustment for population structure is necessary to avoid bias in genetic association studies of susceptibility variants for complex diseases. Population structure may differ from one genomic region to another due to the variability of individual ancestry associated with migration, random genetic drift or natural selection. Current association methods for correcting population stratification usually involve adjustment of global ancestry between study subjects. RESULTS: We suggest interrogating local population structure for fine mapping to more accurately locate true casual genes by better adjusting the confounding effect due to local ancestry. By extensive simulations on genome-wide datasets, we show that adjusting global ancestry may lead to false positives when local population structure is an important confounding factor. In contrast, adjusting local ancestry can effectively prevent false positives due to local population structure and thus can improve fine mapping for disease gene localization. We applied the local and global adjustments to the analysis of datasets from three genome-wide association studies, including European Americans, African Americans and Nigerians. Both European Americans and African Americans demonstrate greater variability in local ancestry than Nigerians. Adjusting local ancestry successfully eliminated the known spurious association between SNPs in the LCT gene and height due to the population structure existed in European Americans. CONTACT: xiaofeng.zhu@case.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Catarina D Campbell; Elizabeth L Ogburn; Kathryn L Lunetta; Helen N Lyon; Matthew L Freedman; Leif C Groop; David Altshuler; Kristin G Ardlie; Joel N Hirschhorn Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2005-07-24 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2006-07-23 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Nick Patterson; Neil Hattangadi; Barton Lane; Kirk E Lohmueller; David A Hafler; Jorge R Oksenberg; Stephen L Hauser; Michael W Smith; Stephen J O'Brien; David Altshuler; Mark J Daly; David Reich Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2004-04-14 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Daniel Levy; Georg B Ehret; Kenneth Rice; Germaine C Verwoert; Lenore J Launer; Abbas Dehghan; Nicole L Glazer; Alanna C Morrison; Andrew D Johnson; Thor Aspelund; Yurii Aulchenko; Thomas Lumley; Anna Köttgen; Ramachandran S Vasan; Fernando Rivadeneira; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Xiuqing Guo; Dan E Arking; Gary F Mitchell; Francesco U S Mattace-Raso; Albert V Smith; Kent Taylor; Robert B Scharpf; Shih-Jen Hwang; Eric J G Sijbrands; Joshua Bis; Tamara B Harris; Santhi K Ganesh; Christopher J O'Donnell; Albert Hofman; Jerome I Rotter; Josef Coresh; Emelia J Benjamin; André G Uitterlinden; Gerardo Heiss; Caroline S Fox; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Eric Boerwinkle; Thomas J Wang; Vilmundur Gudnason; Martin G Larson; Aravinda Chakravarti; Bruce M Psaty; Cornelia M van Duijn Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-05-10 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Yang Zhao; Feng Chen; Rihong Zhai; Xihong Lin; Zhaoxi Wang; Li Su; David C Christiani Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2012-11-12 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Jinghua Liu; Juan Pablo Lewinger; Frank D Gilliland; W James Gauderman; David V Conti Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Qing Duan; Zheng Xu; Laura M Raffield; Suhua Chang; Di Wu; Ethan M Lange; Alex P Reiner; Yun Li Journal: Genet Epidemiol Date: 2017-12-10 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: Priya B Shetty; Hua Tang; Bamidele O Tayo; Alanna C Morrison; Craig L Hanis; Dabeeru C Rao; Jeffery H Young; Ervin R Fox; Eric Boerwinkle; Richard S Cooper; Neil J Risch; Xiaofeng Zhu Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 4.844