Literature DB >> 20889309

Peak power output to left ventricular mass: an index to predict ventricular pumping performance and morbidity in advanced heart failure.

Frank Lloyd Dini1, Donato Mele, Umberto Conti, Piercarlo Ballo, Rodolfo Citro, Francesca Menichetti, Mario Marzilli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Similar to power-to-weight ratio and weight-to-power ratio, which are measurements of the actual performance of any engine, the ratios of peak power output to left ventricular (LV) mass (peak power/mass) and of peak LV mass to power output (peak mass/power) are indices of LV performance potentially useful in heart failure (HF). This Doppler echocardiographic study was designed to evaluate peak power/mass and peak mass/power in patients with advanced HF compared with healthy subjects and to assess their prognostic value.
METHODS: Power output was measured at rest and at peak exercise in 75 subjects, 60 patients with advanced HF (LV ejection fraction ≤ 35%) and 15 controls. Peak LV power output (W) was calculated as the maximal product of (133 × 10⁻⁶) × stroke volume (mL) × mean arterial pressure (mm Hg) × heart rate (beats/min). LV mass was assessed using a standard M-mode echocardiographic method.
RESULTS: Peak power/mass was 1.84 ± 0.46 W/100 g and 0.76 ± 0.31 W/100 g, and peak mass/power was 32 ± 10 g/m²/W and 84 ± 38 g/m²/W in controls and in patients with HF, respectively (both P values < .0001). Peak power/mass was a powerful predictor of outcome on multivariate logistic regression analysis (hazard ratio, 0.907; P = .009). On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the areas under the curve for HF-related events were greater for peak power/mass (P = .002) and peak mass/power (P = .011) with respect to resting ejection fraction. Comparisons of Cox models showed that peak power/mass added prognostic value to a model that included age, New York Heart Association class, etiology, ejection fraction, and diastolic dysfunction (P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: Peak power/mass is useful to discriminate and risk stratify patients with advanced HF with additional power with respect to ejection fraction.
Copyright © 2010 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20889309     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.08.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  5 in total

1.  Resting Cardiac Power Predicts Adverse Outcome in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Shiqi Wang; Aiqi Chen; Xiaokai Duan
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-05

2.  Prognostic significance of resting cardiac power to left ventricular mass and E/e' ratio in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Cong Chen; Jie Zhao; Ruicong Xue; Xiao Liu; Wengen Zhu; Min Ye
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 3.  From left ventricular ejection fraction to cardiac hemodynamics: role of echocardiography in evaluating patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Donato Mele; Aurora Andrade; Paulo Bettencourt; Brenda Moura; Gabriele Pestelli; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Noninvasive Monitoring of Cardiac Output: A Useful Tool Yet?

Authors:  Righab Hamdan; Fida Charif; Ali Zein; Mohamad Issa; Claudette Najjar; Hadi Abdallah; Saleh Fakih; Mohamad Saab
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

5.  Impaired Myocardial Energetics Causes Mechanical Dysfunction in Decompensated Failing Hearts.

Authors:  Rachel Lopez; Bahador Marzban; Xin Gao; Ellen Lauinger; Françoise Van den Bergh; Steven E Whitesall; Kimber Converso-Baran; Charles F Burant; Daniel E Michele; Daniel A Beard
Journal:  Function (Oxf)       Date:  2020-09-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.