STUDY OBJECTIVE: We describe the availability of preventive health services in US emergency departments (EDs), as well as ED directors' preferred service and perceptions of barriers to offering preventive services. METHODS: Using the 2007 National Emergency Department Inventory (NEDI)-USA, we randomly sampled 350 (7%) of 4,874 EDs. We surveyed directors of these EDs to determine the availability of (1) screening and referral programs for alcohol, tobacco, geriatric falls, intimate partner violence, HIV, diabetes, and hypertension; (2) vaccination programs for influenza and pneumococcus; and (3) linkage programs to primary care and health insurance. ED directors were asked to select the service they would most like to implement and to rate 5 potential barriers to offering preventive services. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-seven EDs (80%) responded across 46 states. Availability of services ranged from 66% for intimate partner violence screening to 19% for HIV screening. ED directors wanted to implement primary care linkage most (17%) and HIV screening least (2%). ED directors "agreed/strongly agreed" that the following are barriers to ED preventive care: cost (74%), increased patient length of stay (64%), lack of follow-up (60%), resource shifting leading to worse patient outcomes (53%), and philosophical opposition (27%). CONCLUSION: Most US EDs offer preventive services, but availability and ED director preference for type of service vary greatly. The majority of EDs do not routinely offer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended HIV screening. Most ED directors are not philosophically opposed to offering preventive services but are concerned with added costs, effects on ED operations, and potential lack of follow-up. Copyright Â
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We describe the availability of preventive health services in US emergency departments (EDs), as well as ED directors' preferred service and perceptions of barriers to offering preventive services. METHODS: Using the 2007 National Emergency Department Inventory (NEDI)-USA, we randomly sampled 350 (7%) of 4,874 EDs. We surveyed directors of these EDs to determine the availability of (1) screening and referral programs for alcohol, tobacco, geriatric falls, intimate partner violence, HIV, diabetes, and hypertension; (2) vaccination programs for influenza and pneumococcus; and (3) linkage programs to primary care and health insurance. ED directors were asked to select the service they would most like to implement and to rate 5 potential barriers to offering preventive services. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-seven EDs (80%) responded across 46 states. Availability of services ranged from 66% for intimate partner violence screening to 19% for HIV screening. ED directors wanted to implement primary care linkage most (17%) and HIV screening least (2%). ED directors "agreed/strongly agreed" that the following are barriers to ED preventive care: cost (74%), increased patient length of stay (64%), lack of follow-up (60%), resource shifting leading to worse patient outcomes (53%), and philosophical opposition (27%). CONCLUSION: Most US EDs offer preventive services, but availability and ED director preference for type of service vary greatly. The majority of EDs do not routinely offer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended HIV screening. Most ED directors are not philosophically opposed to offering preventive services but are concerned with added costs, effects on ED operations, and potential lack of follow-up. Copyright Â
Authors: Deborah E Trautman; Melissa L McCarthy; Nancy Miller; Jacquelyn C Campbell; Gabor D Kelen Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2007-02-05 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Michelle A Charfen; Eli Ipp; Amy H Kaji; Tawny Saleh; Mohammed F Qazi; Roger J Lewis Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Clare L Atzema; Cynthia A Jackevicius; Alice Chong; Paul Dorian; Noah M Ivers; Ratika Parkash; Peter C Austin Journal: CMAJ Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: James F Meschia; Cheryl Bushnell; Bernadette Boden-Albala; Lynne T Braun; Dawn M Bravata; Seemant Chaturvedi; Mark A Creager; Robert H Eckel; Mitchell S V Elkind; Myriam Fornage; Larry B Goldstein; Steven M Greenberg; Susanna E Horvath; Costantino Iadecola; Edward C Jauch; Wesley S Moore; John A Wilson Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Kabir Yadav; Daniella Meeker; Rakesh D Mistry; Jason N Doctor; Katherine E Fleming-Dutra; Ross J Fleischman; Samuel D Gaona; Aubyn Stahmer; Larissa May Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Larissa May; Sara Cosgrove; Michelle L'Archeveque; David A Talan; Perry Payne; Jeanne Jordan; Richard E Rothman Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Lauren S Chernick; Melissa S Stockwell; Mengfei Wu; Paula M Castaño; Rebecca Schnall; Carolyn L Westhoff; John Santelli; Peter S Dayan Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: E Jennifer Edelman; An Dinh; Radu Radulescu; Bonnie Lurie; Gail D'Onofrio; Jeanette M Tetrault; David A Fiellin; Lynn E Fiellin Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 3.829