Literature DB >> 20889137

Utility preference score measurement in women with fecal incontinence.

Heidi S Harvie1, Lily A Arya, Emily K Saks, Mary D Sammel, J Sanford Schwartz, Judy A Shea.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the construct validity of 3 multiattribute health status classification system instruments, and a visual analog scale (VAS) for measuring utility scores for women with fecal incontinence (FI). STUDY
DESIGN: Utility scores were measured in 200 women with 1 or more of the following diagnoses: fecal or urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. Pelvic floor symptom severity was measured using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), and quality of life was assessed with the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7). Construct and concurrent validity were evaluated.
RESULTS: After adjusting for age, comorbidities, urinary incontinence, and prolapse, utility scores were significantly lower for women with FI than women without FI for all health status instruments but not the VAS. All health status instruments had significant correlations with PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores.
CONCLUSION: The health status instruments provide valid utility scores in women with FI and would be useful in clinical trials and cost-effectiveness research. Copyright Â
© 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20889137     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  3 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of English language patient-reported outcome measures for use in urogynaecology and female pelvic medicine.

Authors:  Thomas G Gray; Holly Vickers; Priyanka Krishnaswamy; Swati Jha
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The bother of anal incontinence and St. Mark's Incontinence Score.

Authors:  C Paka; I K Atan; H P Dietz
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Cost-effectiveness of sacral nerve stimulation and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Natalia Hounsome; Chris Roukas
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.409

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.