Literature DB >> 20888993

Early versus delayed treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer (MRC OV05/EORTC 55955): a randomised trial.

Gordon J S Rustin1, Maria E L van der Burg, Clare L Griffin, David Guthrie, Alan Lamont, Gordon C Jayson, Gunnar Kristensen, César Mediola, Corneel Coens, Wendi Qian, Mahesh K B Parmar, Ann Marie Swart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Serum CA125 concentration often rises several months before clinical or symptomatic relapse in women with ovarian cancer. In the MRC OV05/EORTC 55955 collaborative trial, we aimed to establish the benefits of early treatment on the basis of increased CA125 concentrations compared with delayed treatment on the basis of clinical recurrence.
METHODS: Women with ovarian cancer in complete remission after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and a normal CA125 concentration were registered for this randomised controlled trial. Clinical examination and CA125 measurement were done every 3 months. Patients and investigators were masked to CA125 results, which were monitored by coordinating centres. If CA125 concentration exceeded twice the upper limit of normal, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by minimisation to early or delayed chemotherapy. Patients and clinical sites were informed of allocation to early treatment, and treatment was started as soon as possible within 28 days of the increased CA125 measurement. Patients assigned to delayed treatment continued masked CA125 measurements, with treatment commencing at clinical or symptomatic relapse. All patients were treated according to standard local practice. The primary outcome was overall survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, ISRCTN87786644.
FINDINGS: 1442 patients were registered for the trial, of whom 529 were randomly assigned to treatment groups and were included in our analysis (265 early, 264 delayed). With a median follow-up of 56·9 months (IQR 37·4-81·8) from randomisation and 370 deaths (186 early, 184 delayed), there was no evidence of a difference in overall survival between early and delayed treatment (HR 0·98, 95% CI 0·80-1·20, p=0·85). Median survival from randomisation was 25·7 months (95% CI 23·0-27·9) for patients on early treatment and 27·1 months (22·8-30·9) for those on delayed treatment.
INTERPRETATION: Our findings showed no evidence of a survival benefit with early treatment of relapse on the basis of a raised CA125 concentration alone, and therefore the value of routine measurement of CA125 in the follow-up of patients with ovarian cancer who attain a complete response after first-line treatment is not proven. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20888993     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61268-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  131 in total

1.  NCCN Working Group report: designing clinical trials in the era of multiple biomarkers and targeted therapies.

Authors:  Alan P Venook; Maria E Arcila; Al B Benson; Donald A Berry; David Ross Camidge; Robert W Carlson; Toni K Choueiri; Valerie Guild; Gregory P Kalemkerian; Razelle Kurzrock; Christine M Lovly; Amy E McKee; Robert J Morgan; Anthony J Olszanski; Mary W Redman; Vered Stearns; Joan McClure; Marian L Birkeland
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 2.  Cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  N Lynn Henry; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Imaging VCAM-1 as an indicator of treatment efficacy in metastatic ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer M Scalici; Stephanie Thomas; Christine Harrer; Timothy A Raines; Joanna Curran; Kristen A Atkins; Mark R Conaway; Linda Duska; Kimberly A Kelly; Jill K Slack-Davis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Patterns and utility of routine surveillance in high grade endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jessica Hunn; Meaghan E Tenney; Ana I Tergas; Erin A Bishop; Kathleen Moore; William Watkin; Carolyn Kirschner; Jean Hurteau; Gustavo C Rodriguez; Ernst Lengyel; Nita K Lee; S Diane Yamada
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Use and Costs of Disease Monitoring in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Melissa K Accordino; Jason D Wright; Sowmya Vasan; Alfred I Neugut; Grace C Hillyer; Jim C Hu; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Does HE4 have a role as biomarker in the recurrence of ovarian cancer?

Authors:  Francesco Plotti; Stella Capriglione; Corrado Terranova; Roberto Montera; Alessia Aloisi; Patrizio Damiani; Ludovico Muzii; Giuseppe Scaletta; Pierluigi Benedetti-Panici; Roberto Angioli
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-08-09

7.  Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Danijela Jelovac; Deborah K Armstrong
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Long noncoding RNA lncARSR promotes epithelial ovarian cancer cell proliferation and invasion by association with HuR and miR-200 family.

Authors:  Chang Shu; Dongmei Yan; Yanxiang Mo; Jishuang Gu; Neelam Shah; Jin He
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 6.166

9.  Assessment of CA-125 area under the curve as a prognostic factor in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sernaz Uzunoglu; Aysun Aybatlı; Petek Balkanlı Kaplan; Irfan Cicin; Necdet Sut; Cenk Sayın; Fusun Varol
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 10.  Role of biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Pierluigi Giampaolino; Virginia Foreste; Luigi Della Corte; Claudia Di Filippo; Giuseppe Iorio; Giuseppe Bifulco
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.