Literature DB >> 20888653

Exploring the potential to remain "Young @ Heart": initial findings of a multi-centre, randomised study of nurse-led, home-based intervention in a hybrid health care system.

Yih-Kai Chan1, Simon Stewart, Alicia Calderone, Paul Scuffham, Stan Goldstein, Melinda J Carrington.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disease management programs have been shown to improve health outcomes in high risk individuals in many but not all health care systems.
METHODS: Young @ Heart is a multi-centre, randomised controlled study of a nurse-led, home-based intervention (HBI) program vs. usual care (UC) in privately insured patients in Australia aged ≥ 45 years following an acute cardiac admission. Intensity of HBI is tailored to an individual's clinical stability, management and risk profile. The primary endpoint is the rate of all-cause stay during a mean of 2.5 years follow-up.
RESULTS: A target of 602 adults (72% men) were randomised to HBI (n=306) or UC (n=296); their initial profiles being well matched. At baseline, 71% were overweight (body mass index 29.7 ± 3.9 kg/m(2)) and 66% had an elevated blood pressure (153 ± 18/89 ± 7 mm Hg). Over half had a history of smoking and 39% had a sub-optimal total cholesterol level >4 mmol/L. Overall, 62% (376 cases) were treated for coronary artery disease (27% with multi-vessel disease and 39% underwent cardiac revascularisation). A further 20% (120 cases) were treated for a cardiac arrhythmia (predominantly atrial fibrillation) and 19% type 2 diabetes mellitus. At 7-14 days post-discharge, 293 (96%) HBI patients received a home visit triggering urgent clinical review and/or enhanced clinical management in many patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The Young @ Heart intervention is a well accepted and potentially effective intervention to reduce recurrent hospital stay in privately insured cardiac patients in Australia. Crown
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20888653     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.08.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D (SF-12) contemporaneous utility scores in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Sanjeewa Kularatna; Joshua Byrnes; Yih Kai Chan; Chantal F Ski; Melinda Carrington; David Thompson; Simon Stewart; Paul A Scuffham
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Comparison of two methods for assessing diabetes risk in a pharmacy setting in Australia.

Authors:  Monique F Kilkenny; Roslyn Johnson; Nadine E Andrew; Tara Purvis; Alison Hicks; Stephen Colagiuri; Dominique A Cadilhac
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Cost-Effectiveness of a Home Based Intervention for Secondary Prevention of Readmission with Chronic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Joshua Byrnes; Melinda Carrington; Yih-Kai Chan; Christine Pollicino; Natalie Dubrowin; Simon Stewart; Paul A Scuffham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Gender-specific secondary prevention? Differential psychosocial risk factors for major cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Christina E Kure; Yih-Kai Chan; Chantal F Ski; David R Thompson; Melinda J Carrington; Simon Stewart
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2016-04-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.