Literature DB >> 20888647

Measurement invariance with respect to ethnicity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).

Kim D Baas1, Angélique O J Cramer, Maarten W J Koeter, Eloy H van de Lisdonk, Henk C van Weert, Aart H Schene.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) has been widely used in research and clinical settings. To be able to attribute differences in PHQ-9 scores between groups with different cultural backgrounds to differences in the level of depression, the instrument has to possess measurement invariance.
METHODS: Data from the Apollo-D study were used. We used two strongly contrasting cultural groups (n=1772). Measurement invariance was assessed by comparing four categorical single factor models with an increasing number of restrictions, representing an increasingly stronger measurement invariance assumption.
RESULTS: The PHQ-9 was measurement invariant for ethnicity in women and partially measurement invariant for ethnicity in men. The item 'psychomotor problems' seemed to be culturally biased in the Surinam Dutch males. It had a higher loading and threshold compared to Dutch males. LIMITATIONS: The sample is restricted to high risk primary care patients, we did not include a gold standard measure of depression and the analyses pertain to a single cross cultural comparison.
CONCLUSIONS: The observed higher total depression score for females in the Surinam Dutch group can be attributed to a true difference in the latent trait depression. For Surinam Dutch and Dutch men some caution is warranted when comparing results obtained with the PHQ-9. In the former group the scores may be biased slightly downward. Future research is needed to examine how the item 'psychomotor problems' performs in different populations. These findings highlight the necessity of establishing measurement invariance before drawing conclusions based on observed scores.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20888647     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  26 in total

1.  Self- and surrogate-reported communication functioning in aphasia.

Authors:  Patrick J Doyle; William D Hula; Shannon N Austermann Hula; Clement A Stone; Julie L Wambaugh; Katherine B Ross; James G Schumacher
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Mental Health and Health-Related Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis Caregivers in Mexico.

Authors:  Gillian G Leibach; Marilyn Stern; Adriana Aguayo Arelis; Miguel Angel Macias Islas; Brenda Viridiana Rábago Barajas
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

3.  Measurement invariance of the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression screener in U.S. adults across sex, race/ethnicity, and education level: NHANES 2005-2016.

Authors:  Jay S Patel; Youngha Oh; Kevin L Rand; Wei Wu; Melissa A Cyders; Kurt Kroenke; Jesse C Stewart
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.505

4.  Factor structure and longitudinal measurement invariance of PHQ-9 for specialist mental health care patients with persistent major depressive disorder: Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling.

Authors:  Boliang Guo; Catherine Kaylor-Hughes; Anne Garland; Neil Nixon; Tim Sweeney; Sandra Simpson; Tim Dalgleish; Rajini Ramana; Min Yang; Richard Morriss
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  The measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for American Indian adults.

Authors:  Melissa L Harry; Stephen C Waring
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  The effects of survey mode on self-reported psychological functioning: Measurement invariance and latent mean comparison across face-to-face and web modes.

Authors:  Gaja Zager Kocjan; Darja Lavtar; Gregor Sočan
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-05-26

7.  Depression is more than the sum score of its parts: individual DSM symptoms have different risk factors.

Authors:  E I Fried; R M Nesse; K Zivin; C Guille; S Sen
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Social Adversity and Psychosis: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Vulnerability.

Authors:  Edo S Jaya; Leonie Ascone; Tania M Lincoln
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  The factor structure of depressive symptoms in patients with obesity enrolled in the RAINBOW clinical trial.

Authors:  Marzieh Majd; Joshua M Smyth; Nan Lv; Lan Xiao; Mark B Snowden; Elizabeth M Venditti; Leanne M Williams; Olusola A Ajilore; Trisha Suppes; Jun Ma
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  Evaluating the Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance of the PHQ-9 between American Indian/Alaska Native Adults and Diverse Racial and Ethnic Groups.

Authors:  Melissa L Harry; R Yates Coley; Stephen C Waring; Gregory E Simon
Journal:  J Affect Disord Rep       Date:  2021-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.