Literature DB >> 20887808

Irrigated-tip magnetic catheter ablation of AF: a long-term prospective study in 130 patients.

Carlo Pappone1, Gabriele Vicedomini, Enrico Frigoli, Luigi Giannelli, Cristiano Ciaccio, Mario Baldi, Francesca Zuffada, Massimo Saviano, Alessia Pappone, Simonetta Crisà, Andrea Petretta, Vincenzo Santinelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonirrigated magnetic ablation may result in potential char, ineffective lesions, and longer procedure times.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to report the safety and long-term efficacy of irrigated-tip magnetic ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF).
METHODS: Catheter ablation was remotely performed using a new irrigated-tip magnetic catheter (ThermoCool NaviStar-RMT, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA) in 130 consecutive patients (mean age 59.7 ± 10.5 years) with symptomatic paroxysmal (81 patients) or persistent (49 patients) AF. The radiofrequency (RF) generator was set to fixed power of 30 W. The primary end point of the study was freedom from atrial tachycardia (AT)/AF off antiarrhythmic drugs.
RESULTS: The procedure was safely performed in all conventional ablation targets, but crossover to manual catheters was required in 12 patients to complete the mitral isthmus line. The total procedure time was 94.6 ± 15.3 minutes. Impedance values significantly decreased during RF applications (P < .001) and the maximum temperature on the catheter tip was 36.4°C ± 0.8°C. The follow-up duration was 15.3 ± 4.9 months. The primary end point was achieved in 66 of 81(81.4%) patients with paroxysmal AF and in 33 of 49 (67.3%) with persistent AF (P = .035, by log-rank test). Patients with paroxysmal AF had higher late AF recurrence (P =.044). Overall, postablation incessant left AT developed in 7 of 130 (5.4%) patients. Major complications were not observed. Left atrial diameter (P < .001) and heart failure (P = .032) predicted arrhythmia recurrence after remote irrigated-tip ablation.
CONCLUSION: Remote ablation with irrigated-tip magnetic catheters can be safely and effectively performed in patients with AF, but longer follow-up periods are required to evaluate late AF recurrences.
Copyright © 2011 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20887808     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  10 in total

Review 1.  Catheter-based ablation of atrial fibrillation: a brief overview.

Authors:  Leila Ganjehei; Mehdi Razavi; Abdi Rasekh
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Irrigated-Tip Magnetic Catheter Ablation Of AF: ALong-Term Prospective Study In 130 Patients.

Authors:  Julian Chun
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2011-07-15

3.  Magnetically guided irrigated gold-tip catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation--techniques, procedural parameters and outcome.

Authors:  Bogdan Muntean; Klaus-Jürgen Gutleben; Johannes Heintze; Jürgen Vogt; Dieter Horstkotte; Georg Nölker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Differences In Tissue Injury and Ablation Outcomes In Atrial Fibrillation Patients - Manual versus Robotic Catheters.

Authors:  Georg Nölker; Dieter Horstkotte; Klaus Jürgen Gutleben
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-08-31

5.  Robotic navigation shows superior improvement in efficiency for atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Anna Maria Elisabeth Noten; Zsuzsanna Kis; Ferdi Akca; Rohit Bhagwandien; Sip Wijchers; Sing-Chien Yap; Tamas Szili-Torok
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2019-02-28

6.  Remotely controlled steerable sheath improves result and procedural parameters of atrial fibrillation ablation with magnetic navigation.

Authors:  Abdelkarim Errahmouni; Decebal Gabriel Latcu; Sok-Sithikun Bun; Nicolas Rijo; Céline Dugourd; Nadir Saoudi
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Remote Magnetic versus Manual Navigation for Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Long-Term, Controlled Data in a Large Cohort.

Authors:  Vikas Kataria; Benjamin Berte; Yves Vandekerckhove; Rene Tavernier; Mattias Duytschaever
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  The Impact of Left Atrial Size in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Remote Magnetic Navigation.

Authors:  Xiao-Yu Liu; Hai-Feng Shi; Jie Zheng; Ku-Lin Li; Xiao-Xi Zhao; Shi-Peng Dang; Ying Wu; Yan Cheng; Xiao-Yan Li; Zhi-Ming Yu; Ru-Xing Wang
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 1.866

9.  Comparisons of efficacy, safety, and recurrence risk factors of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation catheter ablation using robotic magnetic navigation system.

Authors:  Xiao-Xi Zhao; Ku-Lin Li; Ru-Xing Wang; Jie Zheng; Xiao-Yu Liu; Shi-Peng Dang; Zhi-Ming Yu; Chang-Ying Zhang; Xiang-Jun Yang
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 10.  Robotic magnetic navigation for ablation of human arrhythmias.

Authors:  Antoine Da Costa; Jean Baptiste Guichard; Cécile Roméyer-Bouchard; Antoine Gerbay; Karl Isaaz
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-09-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.