Literature DB >> 20887354

A framework for estimating probability of a match in forensic bite mark identification.

Mihran Tuceryan1, Fang Li, Herbert L Blitzer, Edwin T Parks, Jeffrey A Platt.   

Abstract

In forensic dentistry, a human expert typically does the comparison and identification based on bite marks. Unlike DNA analysis, however, there is no quantitative basis with which to assign a probability for this given match. This paper proposes a framework for empirically estimating the probability of such a bite mark match and reports on initial experimental results. The methodology involved collection of dental population data (3D dental casts and bite mark images), image analysis for quantitatively measuring the degree of match (based on chamfer distance), and performing a logistic regression analysis using the collected population data to estimate the probability of match from the calculated degree of match. The model correctly predicted 35 of the 42 matches and 585 of the 588 mismatches. The method also has potential for use in other forensic applications in which the assignment of quantitative probabilities is important.
© 2010 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20887354     DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01571.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  5 in total

Review 1.  The uniqueness of the human dentition as forensic evidence: a systematic review on the technological methodology.

Authors:  Ademir Franco; Guy Willems; Paulo Henrique Couto Souza; Geertruida E Bekkering; Patrick Thevissen
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 2.  Digitization in forensic odontology: A paradigm shift in forensic investigations.

Authors:  Ravleen Nagi; Konidena Aravinda; N Rakesh; Supreet Jain; Navneet Kaur; Amrit Kaur Mann
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2019 Jan-Apr

3.  Frontal Sinus Morphological and Dimensional Variation as Seen on Computed Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Austin A Shamlou; Sean D Tallman
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29

4.  A comparative study of overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis.

Authors:  Mihir Khatri; Mariappan Jonathan Daniel; Subramanian Vasudevan Srinivasan
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2013-01

5.  Epidermis and Enamel: Insights Into Gnawing Criticisms of Human Bitemark Evidence.

Authors:  Robert E Barsley; Mark L Bernstein; Paula C Brumit; Robert B J Dorion; Gregory S Golden; James M Lewis; John D McDowell; Roger D Metcalf; David R Senn; David Sweet; Richard A Weems
Journal:  Am J Forensic Med Pathol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.921

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.