Literature DB >> 20887190

Phylogenetic targeting of research effort in evolutionary biology.

Christian Arnold1, Charles L Nunn.   

Abstract

Many questions in comparative biology require that new data be collected, either to build a comparative database for the first time or to augment existing data. Given resource limitations in collecting data, the question arises as to which species should be studied to increase the size of comparative data sets. By taking hypotheses, existing data relevant to the hypotheses, and a phylogeny, we show that a method of “phylogenetic targeting” can systematically guide data collection while taking into account potentially confounding variables and competing hypotheses. Phylogenetic targeting selects potential candidates for future data collection, using a flexible scoring system based on differences in pairwise comparisons. We used simulations to assess the performance of phylogenetic targeting, as compared with the less systematic approach of randomly selecting species (as might occur when data have been collected without regard to phylogeny and variation in the traits of interest). The simulations revealed that phylogenetic targeting increased the statistical power to detect correlations and that power increased with the number of species in the tree, even when the number of species studied was held constant. We also developed a Web‐based computer program called PhyloTargeting to implement the approach ( http://phylotargeting.fas.harvard.edu ).

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20887190     DOI: 10.1086/656490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  7 in total

1.  Paternal and grandpaternal ages at conception and descendant telomere lengths in chimpanzees and humans.

Authors:  Dan T A Eisenberg; Justin Tackney; Richard M Cawthon; Christina Theresa Cloutier; Kristen Hawkes
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Polynomial algorithms for the Maximal Pairing Problem: efficient phylogenetic targeting on arbitrary trees.

Authors:  Christian Arnold; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 1.405

3.  Evolutionary pressures on primate intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology.

Authors:  Evan L MacLean; Luke J Matthews; Brian A Hare; Charles L Nunn; Rindy C Anderson; Filippo Aureli; Elizabeth M Brannon; Josep Call; Christine M Drea; Nathan J Emery; Daniel B M Haun; Esther Herrmann; Lucia F Jacobs; Michael L Platt; Alexandra G Rosati; Aaron A Sandel; Kara K Schroepfer; Amanda M Seed; Jingzhi Tan; Carel P van Schaik; Victoria Wobber
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Return to the Sea, Get Huge, Beat Cancer: An Analysis of Cetacean Genomes Including an Assembly for the Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae).

Authors:  Marc Tollis; Jooke Robbins; Andrew E Webb; Lukas F K Kuderna; Aleah F Caulin; Jacinda D Garcia; Martine Bèrubè; Nader Pourmand; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Mary J O'Connell; Per J Palsbøll; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Patterns of research effort in birds.

Authors:  Simon Ducatez; Louis Lefebvre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  How the evolution of air breathing shaped hippocampal function.

Authors:  Lucia F Jacobs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.