Literature DB >> 20887144

Evaluation of pullout strength and failure mechanism of posterior instrumentation in normal and osteopenic thoracic vertebrae.

Odysseas Paxinos1, Parmenion P Tsitsopoulos, Michael R Zindrick, Leonard I Voronov, Mark A Lorenz, Robert M Havey, Avinash G Patwardhan.   

Abstract

OBJECT: There is limited data on the pullout strength of spinal fixation devices in the thoracic spine among individuals with different bone quality. An in vitro biomechanical study on the thoracic spine was performed to compare the pullout strength and the mechanism of failure of 4 posterior fixation thoracic constructs in relation to bone mineral density (BMD).
METHODS: A total of 80 vertebrae from 11 fresh-frozen thoracic spines (T2-12) were used. Based on the results from peripheral quantitative CT, specimens were divided into 2 groups (normal and osteopenic) according to their BMD. They were then randomly assigned to 1 of 4 different instrumentation systems (sublaminar wires, pedicle screws, lamina claw hooks, or pedicle screws with wires). The construct was completed with 2 titanium rods and 2 transverse connectors, creating a stable frame. The pullout force to failure perpendicular to the rods as well as the pattern of fixation failure was recorded.
RESULTS: Mean pullout force in the osteopenic Group A (36 vertebrae) was 473.2 ± 179.2 N and in the normal BMD Group B (44 vertebrae) was 1414.5 ± 554.8 N. In Group A, no significant difference in pullout strength was encountered among the different implants (p = 0.96). In Group B, the hook system failed because of dislocation with significantly less force than the other 3 constructs (931.9 ± 345.1 N vs an average of 1538.6 ± 532.7 N; p = 0.02). In the osteopenic group, larger screws demonstrated greater resistance to pullout (p = 0.011). The most common failure mechanism in both groups was through pedicle base fracture.
CONCLUSIONS: Bone quality is an important factor that influences stability of posterior thoracic implants. Fixation strength in the osteopenic group was one-fourth of the value measured in vertebrae with good bone quality, irrespective of the instrumentation used. However, in normal bone quality vertebrae, the lamina hook claw system dislocated with significantly less force when compared with other spinal implants. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of different transpedicular screw designs on the pullout strength in normal and osteopenic thoracic spines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20887144     DOI: 10.3171/2010.4.SPINE09764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  19 in total

1.  Pullout strength of pedicle screws with cement augmentation in severe osteoporosis: a comparative study between cannulated screws with cement injection and solid screws with cement pre-filling.

Authors:  Lih-Huei Chen; Ching-Lung Tai; De-Mei Lee; Po-Liang Lai; Yen-Chen Lee; Chi-Chien Niu; Wen-Jer Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Surgical Treatment of Multiple Osteoporotic Fractures of the Dorsolumbar Spine: Case Report.

Authors:  Ricardo Ramalho Marques; Diogo Lino Moura; Paulo Lourenço
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-03-22

3.  A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Dominik Kaiser; David Volkheimer; Carsten Hackenbroch; Klaus Püschel; Michael Rauschmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Can cavity-based pedicle screw augmentation decrease screw loosening? A biomechanical in vitro study.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Riesner; Thomas R Blattert; Renate Krezdorn; Simone Schädler; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Time to augment?! Impact of cement augmentation on pedicle screw fixation strength depending on bone mineral density.

Authors:  Lukas Weiser; Gerd Huber; Kay Sellenschloh; Lennart Viezens; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Wolfgang Lehmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Determinants of the biomechanical and radiological outcome of surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: the role of rod properties and patient characteristics.

Authors:  Fabrizio Giudici; Fabio Galbusera; Antonino Zagra; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Marino Archetti; Laura Scaramuzzo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Cortical threaded pedicle screw improves fatigue strength in decreased bone quality.

Authors:  Lukas Weiser; Kay Sellenschloh; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Lennart Viezens; Wolfgang Lehmann; Gerd Huber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The impact of bisphosphonates on postoperative complication rates in osteoporotic patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Sidney Roberts; Blake Formanek; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The reinforcement of a C2 laminar screw by a C2 laminar hook as an anchor of occipito-C2 fusion.

Authors:  Masashi Neo; Hiroyuki Yoshitomi; Mitsuru Takemoto; Masanori Izeki
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-10-27

10.  Clinical evaluation of the polymethylmethacrylate-augmented thoracic and lumbar pedicle screw fixation guided by the three-dimensional navigation for the osteoporosis patients.

Authors:  Qiang Yuan; Guilin Zhang; Jingye Wu; Yonggang Xing; Yuqing Sun; Wei Tian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.