Literature DB >> 20886566

Twenty-five pitfalls in the analysis of diffusion MRI data.

Derek K Jones1, Mara Cercignani.   

Abstract

Obtaining reliable data and drawing meaningful and robust inferences from diffusion MRI can be challenging and is subject to many pitfalls. The process of quantifying diffusion indices and eventually comparing them between groups of subjects and/or correlating them with other parameters starts at the acquisition of the raw data, followed by a long pipeline of image processing steps. Each one of these steps is susceptible to sources of bias, which may not only limit the accuracy and precision, but can lead to substantial errors. This article provides a detailed review of the steps along the analysis pipeline and their associated pitfalls. These are grouped into 1 pre-processing of data; 2 estimation of the tensor; 3 derivation of voxelwise quantitative parameters; 4 strategies for extracting quantitative parameters; and finally 5 intra-subject and inter-subject comparison, including region of interest, histogram, tract-specific and voxel-based analyses. The article covers important aspects of diffusion MRI analysis, such as motion correction, susceptibility and eddy current distortion correction, model fitting, region of interest placement, histogram and voxel-based analysis. We have assembled 25 pitfalls (several previously unreported) into a single article, which should serve as a useful reference for those embarking on new diffusion MRI-based studies, and as a check for those who may already be running studies but may have overlooked some important confounds. While some of these problems are well known to diffusion experts, they might not be to other researchers wishing to undertake a clinical study based on diffusion MRI.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20886566     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  316 in total

1.  Altered integrity of the right arcuate fasciculus as a trait marker of schizophrenia: a sibling study using tractography-based analysis of the whole brain.

Authors:  Chen-Hao Wu; Tzung-Jeng Hwang; Yu-Jen Chen; Yun-Chin Hsu; Yu-Chun Lo; Chih-Min Liu; Hai-Gwo Hwu; Chen-Chung Liu; Ming H Hsieh; Yi Ling Chien; Chung-Ming Chen; Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Effects of image distortions originating from susceptibility variations and concomitant fields on diffusion MRI tractography results.

Authors:  M Okan Irfanoglu; Lindsay Walker; Joelle Sarlls; Stefano Marenco; Carlo Pierpaoli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Diffusion tensor-MRI evidence for extra-axonal neuronal degeneration in caudate and thalamic nuclei of patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  S Hannoun; F Durand-Dubief; C Confavreux; D Ibarrola; N Streichenberger; F Cotton; C R G Guttmann; D Sappey-Marinier
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Information-theoretic approach for automated white matter fiber tracts reconstruction.

Authors:  Ferran Prados; Imma Boada; Miquel Feixas; Alberto Prats-Galino; Gerard Blasco; Josep Puig; Salvador Pedraza
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2012-07

5.  Spatial and orientational heterogeneity in the statistical sensitivity of skeleton-based analyses of diffusion tensor MR imaging data.

Authors:  Richard A Edden; Derek K Jones
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  The diffusion tensor imaging toolbox.

Authors:  Jeffry R Alger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  BTK: an open-source toolkit for fetal brain MR image processing.

Authors:  François Rousseau; Estanislao Oubel; Julien Pontabry; Marc Schweitzer; Colin Studholme; Mériam Koob; Jean-Louis Dietemann
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Image registration for quantitative parametric response mapping of cancer treatment response.

Authors:  Jennifer L Boes; Benjamin A Hoff; Nola Hylton; Martin D Pickles; Lindsay W Turnbull; Anne F Schott; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Ryan Chamberlain; Benjamin Lemasson; Thomas L Chenevert; Craig J Galbán; Charles R Meyer; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Predicting future brain tissue loss from white matter connectivity disruption in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Amy Kuceyeski; Hooman Kamel; Babak B Navi; Ashish Raj; Costantino Iadecola
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Functional tractography of white matter by high angular resolution functional-correlation imaging (HARFI).

Authors:  Kurt G Schilling; Yurui Gao; Muwei Li; Tung-Lin Wu; Justin Blaber; Bennett A Landman; Adam W Anderson; Zhaohua Ding; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.