BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of (18)F-FDG PET in assessing tumor response after preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for rectal cancer. METHODS: Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) was measured for 37 patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET before and 4 weeks after completion of preoperative CRT. Pre-SUV, post-SUV, the difference between pre- and post-SUV (ΔSUV), and reduction rate (RR) were correlated with tumor response. RESULTS: A lower mean post-SUV and a higher mean RR were shown in good tumor response (T-downstaging(+) and tumor regression grade 1, 2). Considering pathologic complete response (pCR), the mean post-SUV and the mean RR were significantly different between pCR (+) patients (N = 13) and pCR (-) patients (N = 24) (2.7 vs. 4.8, P < 0.001, 73.9% vs. 58.7%, P = 0.009). With a 3.35 cut-off value for the post-SUV by receiver operating characteristic analysis, 84.6% sensitivity, 79.2% specificity, and 81.2% overall accuracy were obtained for discriminating between pCR (+) and pCR (-) (area under the curve = 0.885, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FDG PET is potentially useful as a method for assessing tumor response after preoperative CRT for rectal cancer. Post-SUV and RR were significantly associated with pathological treatment response, especially in pCR.
BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of (18)F-FDG PET in assessing tumor response after preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for rectal cancer. METHODS: Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) was measured for 37 patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET before and 4 weeks after completion of preoperative CRT. Pre-SUV, post-SUV, the difference between pre- and post-SUV (ΔSUV), and reduction rate (RR) were correlated with tumor response. RESULTS: A lower mean post-SUV and a higher mean RR were shown in good tumor response (T-downstaging(+) and tumor regression grade 1, 2). Considering pathologic complete response (pCR), the mean post-SUV and the mean RR were significantly different between pCR (+) patients (N = 13) and pCR (-) patients (N = 24) (2.7 vs. 4.8, P < 0.001, 73.9% vs. 58.7%, P = 0.009). With a 3.35 cut-off value for the post-SUV by receiver operating characteristic analysis, 84.6% sensitivity, 79.2% specificity, and 81.2% overall accuracy were obtained for discriminating between pCR (+) and pCR (-) (area under the curve = 0.885, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FDG PET is potentially useful as a method for assessing tumor response after preoperative CRT for rectal cancer. Post-SUV and RR were significantly associated with pathological treatment response, especially in pCR.
Authors: Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby; Robert J Myerson; Ilke Nalbantoglu; Changqing Ma; Barry A Siegel Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Jong Wan Kim; Hyun Chul Kim; Ji Won Park; Sung Chan Park; Dae Kyung Sohn; Hyo Seong Choi; Dae Yong Kim; Hee Jin Chang; Ji Yeon Baek; Sun Young Kim; Seok Ki Kim; Jae Hwan Oh Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Laura Del Puerto-Nevado; Juan Pablo Marin-Arango; Maria Jesus Fernandez-Aceñero; David Arroyo-Manzano; Javier Martinez-Useros; Aurea Borrero-Palacios; Maria Rodriguez-Remirez; Arancha Cebrian; Teresa Gomez Del Pulgar; Marlid Cruz-Ramos; Cristina Carames; Begoña Lopez-Botet; Jesús Garcia-Foncillas Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 4.430