Literature DB >> 20886376

A validation study of the Italian Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire.

Luigi Gatta1, Paul Moayyedi, Cesare Tosetti, Nimish Vakil, Enzo Ubaldi, Patrizia Barsanti, Giulia Fiorini, Valentina Castelli, Carlo Gargiulo, Paolo Lucarini, Maurizio Lera, Enkleda Kajo, Francesco Di Mario, Dino Vaira.   

Abstract

Assessment of symptoms should be one of the main outcome measures in dyspepsia clinical trials. This requires a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire that measures the frequency and severity of dyspeptic symptoms. The Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (SF-LDQ) has been proven to fulfil these criteria in its original version in the English language. The aim of the study was to assess the internal consistency, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Italian version of the SF-LDQ in primary and secondary care. Unselected primary and secondary care patients completed the Italian version of the SF-LDQ. Test-retest reliability was assessed after 2 days. Validity was measured by comparison with diagnosis made by physicians. Responsiveness was determined before and after treatment for endoscopically proven disease. The SF-LDQ was administered to 311 patients in primary care and 179 in secondary care patients. Internal consistency, as judged by the Cronbach's α, was 0.90. Pearson's correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.92. The SF-LDQ had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 82%. A highly significant response to change was also observed (p = 0.001). The Italian SF-LDQ is a reliable, valid and responsive self-completed outcome measure for quantifying the frequency and severity of dyspeptic symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20886376     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-010-0467-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  29 in total

Review 1.  The management of dyspepsia: a systematic review.

Authors:  B Delaney; P Moayyedi; J Deeks; M Innes; S Soo; P Barton; S Wilson; R Oakes; A Harris; J Raftery; R Hobbs; D Forman
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Initial validation of a diagnostic questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M J Shaw; N J Talley; T J Beebe; T Rockwood; R Carlsson; S Adlis; A M Fendrick; R Jones; J Dent; P Bytzer
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of severity of dyspepsia assessment (SODA) in a randomized clinical trial of a COX-2-specific inhibitor and traditional NSAID therapy.

Authors:  Linda Rabeneck; Kimberly Wristers; Jay L Goldstein; Glenn Eisen; Seema D Dedhiya; Thomas A Burke
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  The Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire validation study.

Authors:  A Fraser; B C Delaney; A C Ford; M Qume; P Moayyedi
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  Validation of Spanish language dyspepsia questionnaire.

Authors:  Jonathan Goldman; Donald F Conrad; Catherine Ley; David Halperin; Maria de la Luz Sanchez; Rosario Villacorta; Julie Parsonnet
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  A new questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  G R Locke; N J Talley; A L Weaver; A R Zinsmeister
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 7.  Functional gastroduodenal disorders.

Authors:  Jan Tack; Nicholas J Talley; Michael Camilleri; Gerald Holtmann; Pinjin Hu; Juan-R Malagelada; Vincenzo Stanghellini
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  A critique of therapeutic trials in Helicobacter pylori-positive functional dyspepsia.

Authors:  N J Talley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Quality of life in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. An improved evaluation of treatment regimens?

Authors:  E Dimenäs; H Glise; B Hallerbäck; H Hernqvist; J Svedlund; I Wiklund
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  The Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire: a valid tool for measuring the presence and severity of dyspepsia.

Authors:  P Moayyedi; S Duffett; D Braunholtz; S Mason; I D Richards; A C Dowell; A T Axon
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 8.171

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prevalence and severity of dyspepsia in Saudi Arabia: A survey-based study.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Alwhaibi; Sultan Alghadeer; Salmeen Bablghaith; Syed Wajid; Ziyad Alrabiah; Abdulaziz Alhossan; Mohammed Al-Arifi
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Validation of the Kinyarwanda-version Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire and Short-Form Nepean Dyspepsia Index to assess dyspepsia prevalence and quality-of-life impact in Rwanda.

Authors:  Arcade Nkurunziza; Vincent Dusabejambo; Kelly Everhart; Steve Bensen; Tim Walker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.