| Literature DB >> 20886094 |
Rahul S Desikan1, Mert R Sabuncu, Nicholas J Schmansky, Martin Reuter, Howard J Cabral, Christopher P Hess, Michael W Weiner, Alessandro Biffi, Christopher D Anderson, Jonathan Rosand, David H Salat, Thomas L Kemper, Anders M Dale, Reisa A Sperling, Bruce Fischl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) and its transitional state mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are characterized by amyloid plaque and tau neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) deposition within the cerebral neocortex and neuronal loss within the hippocampal formation. However, the precise relationship between pathologic changes in neocortical regions and hippocampal atrophy is largely unknown. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20886094 PMCID: PMC2944799 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012853
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Descriptive statistical information for the participants in the study (means listed with standard deviations in parentheses).
| Diagnostic Group | CN | MCI | AD |
|
| 208 | 353 | 163 |
|
| 76.0(4.9) | 74.5(7.4) | 74.9(7.5) |
|
| 48% | 37% | 50% |
|
| 16.1(2.8) | 15.7(3.0) | 14.8(3.2) |
|
| 29.1(1.0) | 27.0(1.8) | 23.3(1.9) |
|
| 0 | 1.6(0.9) | 4.2(1.6) |
|
| 27% | 54% | 66% |
|
| 5.0(0.54) | 4.41(0.66) | 4.07(0.66) |
Figure 1Three-dimensional representations of the 8 ROIs examined in the current study (only right hemisphere is shown).
All of the ROIs visible in the lateral (top) and medial (bottom) views of the gray matter surface.
Correlation results between cortical thickness of eight neocortical ROIs and total hippocampal volume in all ADNI participants (n = 724).
| Regions of Interest | HV | CMF | ERC | IPL | ITG | ISC | LOC | MOF | TP |
|
| 1 | 0.29 | 0.66 | 0.32 | 0.45 | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.41 | 0.51 |
|
| 1 | 0.38 | 0.79 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.43 | 0.42 | |
|
| 1 | 0.43 | 0.63 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 0.72 | ||
|
| 1 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.44 | 0.44 | |||
|
| 1 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.51 | 0.64 | ||||
|
| 1 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.43 | |||||
|
| 1 | 0.38 | 0.38 | ||||||
|
| 1 | 0.48 | |||||||
|
| 1 |
Spearman's rank correlation coefficients listed, all p-values significant at <0.0001. All analyses included age, gender, education, and APOE-ε4 carrier status as co-variates. HV = Hippocampal volume, CMF = Caudal portion of middle frontal gyrus thickness, ERC = Entorhinal cortex thickness, IPL = Inferior parietal lobule thickness, ITG = Inferior temporal gyrus thickness, ISC = Isthmus portion of cingulate cortex thickness, LOC = Lateral portion of occipital cortex thickness, MOF = Medial portion of orbital frontal cortex thickness, TP = Temporal pole thickness.
Correlation results between cortical thickness of eight neocortical ROIs and total hippocampal volume in only AD individuals (n = 163).
| Regions of Interest | HV | CMF | ERC | IPL | ITG | ISC | LOC | MOF | TP |
|
| 1 | 0.02(NS) | 0.57(0.0001) | 0.03(NS) | 0.23(0.003) | 0.12(NS) | 0.12(NS) | 0.33(0.0001) | 0.38(0.0001) |
|
| 1 | 0.17(0.02) | 0.77(0.0001) | 0.56(0.0001) | 0.58(0.0001) | 0.59(0.0001) | 0.27(0.0005) | 0.24(0.002) | |
|
| 1 | 0.12(NS) | 0.49(0.0001) | 0.27(0.007) | 0.19(0.01) | 0.38(0.0001) | 0.67(0.0001) | ||
|
| 1 | 0.63(0.0001) | 0.64(0.0001) | 0.67(0.0001) | 0.24(0.001) | 0.23(0.01) | |||
|
| 1 | 0.58(0.0001) | 0.51(0.0001) | 0.46(0.0001) | 0.61(0.0001) | ||||
|
| 1 | 0.49(0.0001) | 0.42(0.0001) | 0.34(0.0001) | |||||
|
| 1 | 0.36(0.0001) | 0.29(0.0001) | ||||||
|
| 1 | 0.52(0.0001) | |||||||
|
| 1 |
Spearman's rank correlation coefficients listed with p-values in parentheses. All analyses included age, gender, education, and APOE-ε4 carrier status as co-variates. HV = Hippocampal volume, CMF = Caudal portion of middle frontal gyrus thickness, ERC = Entorhinal cortex thickness, IPL = Inferior parietal lobule thickness, ITG = Inferior temporal gyrus thickness, ISC = Isthmus portion of cingulate cortex thickness, LOC = Lateral portion of occipital cortex thickness, MOF = Medial portion of orbital frontal cortex thickness, TPC = Temporal pole thickness, NS = Not significant.
Correlation results between cortical thickness of eight neocortical ROIs and total hippocampal volume in only MCI individuals (n = 353).
| Regions of Interest | HV | CMF | ERC | IPL | ITG | ISC | LOC | MOF | TP |
|
| 1 | 0.18 | 0.61 | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.32 | 0.48 |
|
| 1 | 0.27 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.43 | 0.34 | |
|
| 1 | 0.31 | 0.55 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.37 | 0.73 | ||
|
| 1 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.40 | 0.37 | |||
|
| 1 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.47 | 0.59 | ||||
|
| 1 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.37 | |||||
|
| 1 | 0.33 | 0.31 | ||||||
|
| 1 | 0.43 | |||||||
|
| 1 |
Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, all p-values significant at <0.0001. All analyses included age, gender, education, and APOE-ε4 carrier status as co-variates. HV = Hippocampal volume, CMF = Caudal portion of middle frontal gyrus thickness, ERC = Entorhinal cortex thickness, IPL = Inferior parietal lobule thickness, ITG = Inferior temporal gyrus thickness, ISC = Isthmus portion of cingulate cortex thickness, LOC = Lateral portion of occipital cortex thickness, MOF = Medial portion of orbital frontal cortex thickness, TPC = Temporal pole thickness.
Correlation results between cortical thickness of eight neocortical ROIs and total hippocampal volume in only CN individuals (n = 208).
| Regions of Interest | HV | CMF | ERC | IPL | ITG | ISC | LOC | MOF | TP |
|
| 1 | 0.16(0.02) | 0.36(0.0001) | 0.15(0.02) | 0.20(0.003) | 0.19(0.005) | 0.03(NS) | 0.29(0.0001) | 0.23(0.0005) |
|
| 1 | 0.27(0.0001) | 0.76(0.0001) | 0.51(0.0001) | 0.49(0.0001) | 0.62(0.0001) | 0.34(0.0005) | 0.38(0.002) | |
|
| 1 | 0.35(0.0001) | 0.52(0.0001) | 0.31(0.007) | 0.28(0.0001) | 0.37(0.0001) | 0.56(0.0001) | ||
|
| 1 | 0.63(0.0001) | 0.51(0.0001) | 0.75(0.0001) | 0.38(0.001) | 0.40(0.01) | |||
|
| 1 | 0.48(0.0001) | 0.57(0.0001) | 0.38(0.0001) | 0.49(0.0001) | ||||
|
| 1 | 0.44(0.0001) | 0.38(0.0001) | 0.23(0.0005) | |||||
|
| 1 | 0.31(0.0001) | 0.31(0.0001) | ||||||
|
| 1 | 0.35(0.0001) | |||||||
|
| 1 |
Spearman's rank correlation coefficients listed with p-values in parentheses. All analyses included age, gender, education, and APOE-ε4 carrier status as co-variates. HV = Hippocampal volume, CMF = Caudal portion of middle frontal gyrus thickness, ERC = Entorhinal cortex thickness, IPL = Inferior parietal lobule thickness, ITG = Inferior temporal gyrus thickness, ISC = Isthmus portion of cingulate cortex thickness, LOC = Lateral portion of occipital cortex thickness, MOF = Medial portion of orbital frontal cortex thickness, TPC = Temporal pole thickness, NS = Not significant.
Figure 2General linear model analyses demonstrating the prediction of longitudinal hippocampal atrophy (over one year) using baseline cortical thickness for the amyloid positive (top panel) and p-tau positive individuals (bottom panel).
All results are corrected for multiple comparisons by method of Monte Carlo simulation and shown on the gray matter surface (only right hemisphere). The color scale illustrates the magnitude of effect with blue indicating areas of strongest prediction strength.
Figure 3Bar plots illustrating mean cortical thickness, standardized to Z scores, for the 8 neocortical ROIs amongst the amyloid positive (Aβ+), amyloid negative (Aβ−), p-tau positive (Pτ+), and p-tau negative (Pτ−) older individuals.
Error bars indicate 1 standard error of the mean.