| Literature DB >> 20886071 |
Kaiguo Mo1, Zak Razak, Pengcheng Rao, Zhigang Yu, Hiroaki Adachi, Masahisa Katsuno, Gen Sobue, Andrew P Lieberman, J Timothy Westwood, D Ashley Monks.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence implicates altered gene expression within skeletal muscle in the pathogenesis of Kennedy disease/spinal bulbar muscular atrophy (KD/SBMA). We therefore broadly characterized gene expression in skeletal muscle of three independently generated mouse models of this disease. The mouse models included a polyglutamine expanded (polyQ) AR knock-in model (AR113Q), a polyQ AR transgenic model (AR97Q), and a transgenic mouse that overexpresses wild type AR solely in skeletal muscle (HSA-AR). HSA-AR mice were included because they substantially reproduce the KD/SBMA phenotype despite the absence of polyQ AR. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20886071 PMCID: PMC2944863 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012922
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Venn diagrams of microarray results by mouse model.
Diagram representing the number of genes whose expression differed from WT controls for each mutant strain (HSA-AR, AR97Q, AR113Q), and the number of such genes shared by each model. Notably, the overlap between HSA-AR and either of the polyQ models was similar to the overlap between the polyQ AR samples. Gene numbers were obtained by examining gene lists generated by a 2-fold, p≤0.05 criterion.
Validation of the results of microarray experiments by qRT-PCR analysis.
| Microarray Fold Change Relative to WT | qRT-PCR Fold Change Relative to WT (P-value) | |||||
| Unigene Symbol | HSA-AR | AR97Q | AR113Q | HSA-AR | AR97Q | AR113Q |
|
| −1.86 | −5.11 | −2.22 | −1.74 (0.01) | −2.35 (0.03) | −1.92 (0.02) |
|
| −3.46 | −6.69 | −6.67 | −2.56 (0.03) | −2.78 (0.05) | −3.03 (0.02) |
|
| −4.99 | −80.73 | −18.48 | −5.26 (0.05) | −33.33 (<0.01) | −7.69 (0.04) |
|
| −9.47 | −8.79 | −32.22 | −4.76 (0.01) | −25.00 (0.04) | −33.33 (<0.01) |
|
| 4.84 | 2.68 | 4.05 | 2.38 (0.05) | 5.41 (<0.01) | 2.81 (0.04) |
|
| 15.69 | 16.68 | 6.11 | 45.51 (0.04) | 28.55 (<0.01) | 6.81 (0.01) |
All samples were compared with their WT controls to evaluate fold change. The expression of each test gene was normalized to the level of GAPDH within each sample prior to comparisons between samples. Each group represents samples from 3 mice.
Functional distributions of regulated genes in some clusters by Database for Annotation Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) analysis.
| Pattern of Regulation | Functional Groupings | P-value |
| Down in all models | Protein modification, Phosphate metabolism, Endoplasmic reticulum, Regulation of neurogenesis, Glycerol metabolism, Amino acid metabolism, Calmodulin binding, Magnesium ion binding, Regulation of protein kinase activity | 0.0466 |
| Up in all models | Intracellular organelle, Transcription cofactor activity, Focal adhesion, I band | 0.0481 |
| Down in PolyQ models | Metal ion binding, Steroid metabolism, Sarcomere, Muscle contraction, Filamentous actin, Endocytosis, Chemical homeostasis, Macrophage activation, Membrane fraction | 0.0408 |
| Up in PolyQ models | Hydrolase activity, Protein binding, Peptidase activity | 0.0356 |
| Down in HSA-AR | Protein modification, Metal ion binding, Muscle contraction, Kinase activity, Neuron projection, Actin cytoskeleton, Mitochondrion, Phosphotransferase activity, Glucose metabolism | 0.0563 |
| Up in HSA-AR | Protein metabolism, I band, Response to stress, Kallikrein activity, Induction of apoptosis, Zinc ion binding, Calcium ion binding, Transcription factor binding, Actin cytoskeleton | 0.0639 |
Functional analysis of regulated genes was performed using Functional Annotation Tool (DAVID Bioinformatics Resources) according to GO term (biological process, molecular function and cellular component) on several clusters: cluster 8 which was down in all models, cluster 15 which was up in all models, clusters 2 and 7 which were down in polyQ models only, cluster 14 which was up in polyQ models only, cluster 4 which was up only in HSA-AR and clusters 10 and 11 which were up only in HSA-AR.
Figure 2Hierarchical cluster analysis of gene expression in the 3 mouse models.
Cluster output represents colorimetrically indicated log2 ratio change. Mutant strains are represented by columns and rows represent a single gene. Clusters of co-regulated genes are labeled. Most clusters are unique to one of the mutant strains. Only cluster 8 and 15 show similar patterns across the 3 models, and clusters 7 and 14 are similar in the polyQ models but not HSA-AR.
KEGG analysis of gene pathways for shared clusters.
| Pathway | HSA-AR gene # | P-value | AR97Q gene # | P-value | AR113Q gene # | P-value |
| Insulin signaling pathway | 9 | 0.0017 | 9 | 0.0034 | 4 | 0.1996 |
| Focal adhesion | 8 | 0.0420 | 8 | 0.0686 | 6 | 0.0680 |
| Adherens Junction | 4 | 0.1289 | 5 | 0.0500 | 4 | 0.0526 |
| Regulation of actin cytoskeleton | 6 | 0.2714 | 9 | 0.0398 | 4 | 0.4295 |
| Calcium signaling pathway | 7 | 0.0723 | 9 | 0.0159 | 3 | |
| MAPK signaling pathway | 2 | 10 | 0.0460 | 4 |
Complete gene lists resulting from microarray analysis of each model were separately analyzed with DAVID and the resulting KEGG pathways and associated p-values of obtaining these pathways by chance are represented. The number of hits was determined from the gene lists manually.