Literature DB >> 20885250

Calcium phosphate cements in skull reconstruction: a meta-analysis.

Ahmed M Afifi1, Chad R Gordon, Landon S Pryor, Walter Sweeney, Frank A Papay, James E Zins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This work addresses the controversy regarding the indications and results of calcium phosphate cements in skull reconstruction through a meta-analysis of the published literature.
METHODS: A PubMed search for articles reporting the use of calcium phosphate cements for skull reconstruction was performed. Data collected included age, volume of cement, defect size, material used, length of follow-up, placement in communication with paranasal sinuses or in irradiated fields, and complications.
RESULTS: Nineteen articles met the authors' inclusion criteria. The mean rates of complications were as follows: total complications, 13 percent (range, 0 to 62 percent); major complications, 9 percent (range, 0 to 62 percent); minor complications, 2 percent (range, 0 to 5 percent); infection, 5 percent (range, 0 to 22 percent); reoperation, 14 percent (range, 0 to 62 percent); and secondary surgery for contour correction, 1 percent (range, 0 to 12 percent). There was significant heterogeneity in the estimated rate of total and major complications, infection, and reoperation (p < 0.001), but minor complications and secondary contour correction had less heterogeneity (p = 0.58 and p = 0.78, respectively). Radiotherapy and communication with the paranasal sinuses significantly increased the complication rate (p < 0.05). Duration between surgery and complications averaged 17.5 months (range, 1 to 89 months).
CONCLUSIONS: When mean complication rate and complication range of calcium phosphate cements in our meta-analysis were compared with previous large cranioplasty studies using methylmethacrylate or autogenous bone, calcium phosphate fared no better, and sometimes fared worse, than these other modalities. Calcium phosphate, therefore, should only be used selectively, and prospective long-term studies are needed to further refine its role in skull reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20885250     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ead057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of Three Cases Using a Novel Titanium Mesh System-Skull-Fit with Orbital Wall (Skull-Fit WOW)-For Cranial Base Reconstructions.

Authors:  Noriko Hattori; Hideo Nakajima; Ikkei Tamada; Yoshiaki Sakamoto; Takayuki Ohira; Kazunari Yoshida; Takeshi Kawase; Kazuo Kishi
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2011-09

Review 2.  A review of reconstructive materials for use in craniofacial surgery bone fixation materials, bone substitutes, and distractors.

Authors:  James Tait Goodrich; Adam L Sandler; Oren Tepper
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Bone Cement Cranioplasty Reduces Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Rate after Microvascular Decompression: A Single-Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Daniel I Wolfson; Jordan A Magarik; Saniya S Godil; Hamid M Shah; Joseph S Neimat; Peter E Konrad; Dario J Englot
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-08-20

4.  Reduced CSF leak in complete calvarial reconstructions of microvascular decompression craniectomies using calcium phosphate cement.

Authors:  Chikezie I Eseonu; C Rory Goodwin; Xin Zhou; Debebe Theodros; Matthew T Bender; Dimitrios Mathios; Chetan Bettegowda; Michael Lim
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Adeno-associated virus-coated allografts: a novel approach for cranioplasty.

Authors:  Ayelet Ben Arav; Gadi Pelled; Yoram Zilberman; Nadav Kimelman-Bleich; Zulma Gazit; Edward M Schwarz; Dan Gazit
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 3.963

6.  PTH promotes allograft integration in a calvarial bone defect.

Authors:  Dmitriy Sheyn; Doron Cohn Yakubovich; Ilan Kallai; Susan Su; Xiaoyu Da; Gadi Pelled; Wafa Tawackoli; Galen Cook-Weins; Edward M Schwarz; Dan Gazit; Zulma Gazit
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  State-of-Art of Standard and Innovative Materials Used in Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Valentina Siracusa; Giuseppe Maimone; Vincenzo Antonelli
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.329

8.  A Superior Cerebellar Convexity Two-Part Craniotomy to Access the Paramedian Supra and Infratentorial Space: Technical Note.

Authors:  Tene Cage; Arnau Benet; John Golfinos; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-06-30

9.  Bioceramic Implant Induces Bone Healing of Cranial Defects.

Authors:  Thomas Engstrand; Lars Kihlström; Kalle Lundgren; Margarita Trobos; Håkan Engqvist; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-25

10.  Early resorption of an artificial bone graft made of calcium phosphate for cranioplasty: case report.

Authors:  Bernardo Assumpção de Monaco; Erich Talamoni Fonoff; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.