Literature DB >> 20884990

Anteroposterior positioning of the tibial component and its effect on the mechanics of patellofemoral contact.

K Didden1, T Luyckx, J Bellemans, L Labey, B Innocenti, H Vandenneucker.   

Abstract

The biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint can become disturbed during total knee replacement by alterations induced by the position and shape of the different prosthetic components. The role of the patella and femoral trochlea has been well studied. We have examined the effect of anterior or posterior positioning of the tibial component on the mechanisms of patellofemoral contact in total knee replacement. The hypothesis was that placing the tibial component more posteriorly would reduce patellofemoral contact stress while providing a more efficient lever arm during extension of the knee. We studied five different positions of the tibial component using a six degrees of freedom dynamic knee simulator system based on the Oxford rig, while simulating an active knee squat under physiological loading conditions. The patellofemoral contact force decreased at a mean of 2.2% for every millimetre of posterior translation of the tibial component. Anterior positions of the tibial component were associated with elevation of the patellofemoral joint pressure, which was particularly marked in flexion > 90°. From our results we believe that more posterior positioning of the tibial component in total knee replacement would be beneficial to the patellofemoral joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884990     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.24221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  7 in total

Review 1.  How to read a postoperative knee replacement radiograph.

Authors:  Nawfal Al-Hadithy; Madhavan C Papanna; Sana Farooq; Yegappan Kalairajah
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Knee kinetics and kinematics: What are the effects of TKA malconfigurations?

Authors:  Silvia Pianigiani; Luc Labey; Walter Pascale; Bernardo Innocenti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Tibial component coverage and rotational alignment accuracy after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yoshinori Ishii; Hideo Noguchi; Junko Sato; Hana Ishii; Koji Todoroki; Shin-Ichi Toyabe
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-10

4.  Influence of tibial rotation in total knee arthroplasty on knee kinematics and retropatellar pressure: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Arnd Steinbrück; Christian Schröder; Matthias Woiczinski; Tatjana Müller; Peter E Müller; Volkmar Jansson; Andreas Fottner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Do refinements to original designs improve outcome of total knee replacement? A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marieke J Piepers; Ruud P van Hove; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Peter A Nolte
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation Analysis on the Impact of Patellar Component Design and Positioning on Joint Dynamics after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maeruan Kebbach; Martin Darowski; Sven Krueger; Christoph Schilling; Thomas M Grupp; Rainer Bader; Andreas Geier
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Kinematics and kinetics comparison of ultra-congruent versus medial-pivot designs for total knee arthroplasty by multibody analysis.

Authors:  Giovanni Putame; Mara Terzini; Fabrizio Rivera; Maeruan Kebbach; Rainer Bader; Cristina Bignardi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.