Literature DB >> 20884984

The use of a femoral revision stem in the treatment of primary or secondary bone tumours of the proximal femur: a prospective study of 31 cases.

O E Bischel1, P M Böhm.   

Abstract

Endoprosthetic reconstruction following resection of 31 tumours of the proximal femur in 30 patients was performed using a Wagner SL femoral revision stem. The mean follow-up was 25.6 months (0.6 to 130.0). Of the 28 patients with a metastasis, 27 died within a mean follow-up period of 18.1 months (0.6 to 56.3) after the operation, and the remaining patient was excluded from the study 44.4 months post-operatively when the stem was removed. The two patients with primary bone tumours were still alive at the latest follow-up of 81.0 and 130.0 months, respectively. One stem only was removed for suspected low-grade infection 44.4 months post-operatively. The worst-case survival rate with removal of the stem for any cause and/or loss to follow-up was 80.0% (95% confidence interval 44.9 to 100) at 130.0 months. The mean Karnofsky index increased from 44.2% (20% to 70%) pre-operatively to 59.7% (0% to 100%) post-operatively, and the mean Merle d'Aubigné score improved from 4.5 (0 to 15) to 12.0 (0 to 18). The mean post-operative Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 62.4% (3.3% to 100%). The Wagner SL femoral revision stem offers an alternative to special tumour prostheses for the treatment of primary and secondary tumours of the proximal femur. The mid-term results are very promising, but long-term experience is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884984     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.24024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  4 in total

1.  Fixation pattern of conical and cylindrical modular revision hip stems in different size bone defects.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Jan Nadorf; Marc N Thomsen; Christian Heisel; Alexander Jahnke; Jan P Kretzer; Eike Jakubowitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Serena Oliva; Raffaele Vitiello; Michele Cauteruccio; Elisa Pesare; Giuseppe Rovere; Cesare Meschini; Francesco Liuzza; Giulio Maccauro; Antonio Ziranu
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2020-06-26

3.  En-Bloc Resection of Metastases of the Proximal Femur and Reconstruction by Modular Arthroplasty is Not Only Justified in Patients with a Curative Treatment Option-An Observational Study of a Consecutive Series of 45 Patients.

Authors:  Oliver E Bischel; Arnold J Suda; Paul M Böhm; Burkhard Lehner; Rudi G Bitsch; Jörn B Seeger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Cemented vs uncemented megaprostheses in proximal femur metastases: a multicentric comparative study.

Authors:  Maria Serena Oliva; Francesco Muratori; Raffaele Vitiello; Antonio Ziranu; Lorenzo Foschi; Giuseppe Rovere; Cesare Meschini; Domenico Andrea Campanacci; Giulio Maccauro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 2.562

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.