OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that postural instability with falling (PIF) and freezing of gait (FOG) are distinct subtypes of the postural instability/gait disturbance (PIGD) form of Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: 499 PD subjects from the NeuroGenetics Research Consortium were studied using logistic regression to examine, in a cross sectional analysis, predictors of FOG and PIF. Potential predictors were from four spheres; demographic, clinical motor, clinical non-motor and genetic. RESULTS: FOG and PIF were both associated with greater gait subscores and lower tremor subscores on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (p ≤ 0.02). However, they differed with regard to demographic, non-motor and genetic predictors. FOG was associated with greater duration of disease, with ORs of 3.01 (95% CI 1.35 to 6.72) and 4.91 (95% CI 2.29 to 10.54) for third and fourth quartiles of duration, respectively, versus the lowest half of duration. The risk of having psychotic symptoms was also significantly increased (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.41 to 6.49; p=0.004). FOG was inversely associated with the presence of the CYP2D6*4 allele (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.80; p=0.009) suggesting a protective effect. PIF was associated with depression (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.15; p<0.02) and was inversely associated with APOE ε4 (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.87; p=0.03), again suggesting a protective effect. CONCLUSION: FOG and PIF have different demographic, non-motor and genetic predictors suggesting that they may be pathophysiologically distinct subtypes of PIGD. These findings have implications in the discovery of therapeutic targets for these disabling features as well as for predicting outcomes of PD.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that postural instability with falling (PIF) and freezing of gait (FOG) are distinct subtypes of the postural instability/gait disturbance (PIGD) form of Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: 499 PD subjects from the NeuroGenetics Research Consortium were studied using logistic regression to examine, in a cross sectional analysis, predictors of FOG and PIF. Potential predictors were from four spheres; demographic, clinical motor, clinical non-motor and genetic. RESULTS:FOG and PIF were both associated with greater gait subscores and lower tremor subscores on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (p ≤ 0.02). However, they differed with regard to demographic, non-motor and genetic predictors. FOG was associated with greater duration of disease, with ORs of 3.01 (95% CI 1.35 to 6.72) and 4.91 (95% CI 2.29 to 10.54) for third and fourth quartiles of duration, respectively, versus the lowest half of duration. The risk of having psychotic symptoms was also significantly increased (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.41 to 6.49; p=0.004). FOG was inversely associated with the presence of the CYP2D6*4 allele (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.80; p=0.009) suggesting a protective effect. PIF was associated with depression (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.15; p<0.02) and was inversely associated with APOE ε4 (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.87; p=0.03), again suggesting a protective effect. CONCLUSION:FOG and PIF have different demographic, non-motor and genetic predictors suggesting that they may be pathophysiologically distinct subtypes of PIGD. These findings have implications in the discovery of therapeutic targets for these disabling features as well as for predicting outcomes of PD.
Authors: Denise M Kay; Stewart A Factor; Ali Samii; Donald S Higgins; Alida Griffith; John W Roberts; Berta C Leis; John G Nutt; Jennifer S Montimurro; Robert G Keefe; April J Atkins; Dora Yearout; Cyrus P Zabetian; Haydeh Payami Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2008-10-05 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: J P Hubble; J H Kurth; S L Glatt; M C Kurth; G D Schellenberg; R E Hassanein; A Lieberman; W C Koller Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 1998 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Martine Visser; Albert F G Leentjens; Johan Marinus; Anne M Stiggelbout; Jacobus J van Hilten Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: S A Factor; P J Feustel; J H Friedman; C L Comella; C G Goetz; R Kurlan; M Parsa; R Pfeiffer Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-06-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ruth M Pickering; Yvette A M Grimbergen; Una Rigney; Ann Ashburn; Gordon Mazibrada; Brian Wood; Peggy Gray; Graham Kerr; Bastiaan R Bloem Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2007-10-15 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Stewart A Factor; N Kyle Steenland; Donald S Higgins; Eric S Molho; Denise M Kay; Jennifer Montimurro; Ami R Rosen; Cyrus P Zabetian; Haydeh Payami Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: V E Kelly; C O Johnson; E L McGough; A Shumway-Cook; F B Horak; K A Chung; A J Espay; F J Revilla; J Devoto; C Wood-Siverio; S A Factor; B Cholerton; K L Edwards; A L Peterson; J F Quinn; T J Montine; C P Zabetian; J B Leverenz Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: Tyler Harrison Reekes; Christopher Ian Higginson; Christina Raye Ledbetter; Niroshan Sathivadivel; Richard Matthew Zweig; Elizabeth Ann Disbrow Journal: NPJ Parkinsons Dis Date: 2020-04-08
Authors: Gonzalo J Revuelta; Subramaniam Uthayathas; Amy E Wahlquist; Stewart A Factor; Stella M Papa Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Albert A Davis; Casey E Inman; Zachary M Wargel; Umber Dube; Brittany M Freeberg; Alexander Galluppi; Jessica N Haines; Dhruva D Dhavale; Rebecca Miller; Fahim A Choudhury; Patrick M Sullivan; Carlos Cruchaga; Joel S Perlmutter; Jason D Ulrich; Bruno A Benitez; Paul T Kotzbauer; David M Holtzman Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 17.956