Literature DB >> 20884480

The role of contrast sensitivity in global motion processing deficits in the elderly.

Harriet A Allen1, Claire V Hutchinson, Tim Ledgeway, Precius Gayle.   

Abstract

This study compared the effects of age on the perception of translational, radial, and rotational global motion patterns. Motion coherence thresholds were measured for judging the direction of each motion type as a function of contrast (visibility) and temporal sampling rate in young and elderly participants. Coherence thresholds decreased as dot contrast increased asymptoting at high dot contrasts but were higher in elderly compared to young participants. This equated to global motion impairment in the elderly of a factor of around 2, characterized by a shift of the threshold vs. contrast function along the horizontal axes (dot contrast). The effect of contrast interacted with the temporal sampling rate. Old participants were deleteriously affected by reduced temporal sampling particularly at low contrasts. The findings suggest that age-related changes in global motion perception may be driven principally by deficits in contrast encoding, rather than by deficits in motion integration and suggest a role for increased internal noise in the older visual system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884480     DOI: 10.1167/10.10.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  15 in total

1.  Global motion perception is independent from contrast sensitivity for coherent motion direction discrimination and visual acuity in 4.5-year-old children.

Authors:  Arijit Chakraborty; Nicola S Anstice; Robert J Jacobs; Nabin Paudel; Linda L LaGasse; Barry M Lester; Trecia A Wouldes; Jane E Harding; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Reduction in direction discrimination with age and slow speed is due to both increased internal noise and reduced sampling efficiency.

Authors:  Lotte-Guri Bogfjellmo; Peter J Bex; Helle K Falkenberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Associations between genetic variations and global motion perception.

Authors:  Marina Kunchulia; Nato Kotaria; Karin Pilz; Adam Kotorashvili; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Contrast sensitivity and motion discrimination in cannabis users.

Authors:  Elena Mikulskaya; Frances Heritage Martin
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Feature-selective attention in healthy old age: a selective decline in selective attention?

Authors:  Cliodhna Quigley; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Visual characteristics of elderly night drivers in the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Driving Study.

Authors:  Mona A Kaleem; Beatriz E Munoz; Cynthia A Munro; Emily W Gower; Sheila K West
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  The ups and downs of global motion perception: a paradoxical advantage for smaller stimuli in the aging visual system.

Authors:  Claire V Hutchinson; Tim Ledgeway; Harriet A Allen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Visual perception in dyslexia is limited by sub-optimal scale selection.

Authors:  Richard Johnston; Nicola J Pitchford; Neil W Roach; Timothy Ledgeway
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Self-motion perception in the elderly.

Authors:  Matthias Lich; Frank Bremmer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Editorial: Perception and Cognition: Interactions in the Aging Brain.

Authors:  Harriet A Allen; Katherine L Roberts
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.