Literature DB >> 20882673

Transurethral prostate magnetic resonance elastography: prospective imaging requirements.

Arvin Arani1, Donald Plewes, Rajiv Chopra.   

Abstract

Tissue stiffness is known to undergo alterations when affected by prostate cancer and may serve as an indicator of the disease. Stiffness measurements can be made with magnetic resonance elastography performed using a transurethral actuator to generate shear waves in the prostate gland. The goal of this study was to help determine the imaging requirements of transurethral magnetic resonance elastography and to evaluate whether the spatial and stiffness resolution of this technique overlapped with the requirements for prostate cancer detection. Through the use of prostate-mimicking gelatin phantoms, frequencies of at least 400 Hz were necessary to obtain accurate stiffness measurements of 10 mm diameter inclusions, but the detection of inclusions with diameters as small as 4.75 mm was possible at 200 Hz. The shear wave attenuation coefficient was measured in vivo in the canine prostate gland, and was used to predict the detectable penetration depth of shear waves in prostate tissue. These results suggested that frequencies below 200 Hz could propagate to the prostate boundary with a signal to noise ratio (SNR) of 60 and an actuator capable of producing 60 μm displacements. These requirements are achievable with current imaging and actuator technologies, and motivate further investigation of magnetic resonance elastography for the targeting of prostate cancer.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20882673     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  9 in total

Review 1.  General review of magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Scott A Kruse; David J Lomas
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

Review 2.  Prostate cancer detection and diagnosis: the role of MR and its comparison with other diagnostic modalities--a radiologist's perspective.

Authors:  Tobias Penzkofer; Clare M Tempany-Afdhal
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Magnetic resonance elastography of the prostate in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: feasibility of the modified driver at high multi-frequencies.

Authors:  Ying Deng; Zhuoya Yi; Tianhui Zhang; Bing Hu; Linqi Zhang; Kritisha Rajlawot; Sichi Kuang; Bingjun He; Arvin Arani; Jun Chen; Meng Yin; Phillip Rossman; Kevin J Glaser; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman; Jin Wang
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-10-11

Review 4.  New and Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Other Abdominal Organs.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Ying Deng; Danielle Jondal; David M Woodrum; Yu Shi; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in cancer: Technique, analysis, and applications.

Authors:  Kay M Pepin; Richard L Ehman; Kiaran P McGee
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 9.795

6.  In vivo, high-frequency three-dimensional cardiac MR elastography: Feasibility in normal volunteers.

Authors:  Arvin Arani; Kevin L Glaser; Shivaram P Arunachalam; Phillip J Rossman; David S Lake; Joshua D Trzasko; Armando Manduca; Kiaran P McGee; Richard L Ehman; Philip A Araoz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-01-17       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Ristretto MRE: A generalized multi-shot GRE-MRE sequence.

Authors:  Christian Guenthner; Sweta Sethi; Marian Troelstra; Ayse Sila Dokumaci; Ralph Sinkus; Sebastian Kozerke
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Wave Propagation in a Fractional Viscoelastic Tissue Model: Application to Transluminal Procedures.

Authors:  Antonio Gomez; Guillermo Rus; Nader Saffari
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 9.  Why Are Viscosity and Nonlinearity Bound to Make an Impact in Clinical Elastographic Diagnosis?

Authors:  Guillermo Rus; Inas H Faris; Jorge Torres; Antonio Callejas; Juan Melchor
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.