Literature DB >> 20882302

Is MRI a reliable tool to locate the electrode after deep brain stimulation surgery? Comparison study of CT and MRI for the localization of electrodes after DBS.

Ji Yeoun Lee1, Jin Wook Kim, Jee-Young Lee, Yong Hoon Lim, Cheolyoung Kim, Dong Gyu Kim, Beom Seok Jeon, Sun Ha Paek.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: MRI has been utilized to localize the electrode after deep brain stimulation, but its accuracy has been questioned due to image distortion. Under the hypothesis that MRI is not adequate for evaluation of electrode position after deep brain stimulation, this study is aimed at validating the accuracy of MRI in electrode localization in comparison with CT scan.
METHODS: Sixty one patients who had undergone STN DBS were enrolled for the analysis. Using mutual information technique, CT and MRI taken at 6 months after the operation were fused. The x and y coordinates of the centers of electrodes shown of CT and MRI were compared in the fused images to calculate average difference at five different levels. The difference of the tips of the electrodes, designated as the z coordinate, was also calculated.
RESULTS: The average of the distance between the centers of the electrodes in the five levels estimated in the fused image of brain CT and MRI taken at least 6 months after STN DBS was 1.33 mm (0.1-5.8 mm). The average discrepancy of x coordinates for all five levels between MRI and CT was 0.56 ± 0.54 mm (0-5.7 mm), the discrepancy of y coordinates was 1.06 ± 0.59 mm (0-3.5 mm), and for the z coordinate, it was 0.98 ± 0.52 mm (0-3.1 mm) (all p values < 0.001). Notably, the average discrepancy of x coordinates at 3.5 mm below AC-PC level, i.e., at the STN level between MRI and CT, was 0.59 ± 0.42 mm (0-2.4 mm); the discrepancy of y coordinates was 0.81 ± 0.47 mm (0-2.9 mm) (p values < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that there was significant discrepancy between the centers of electrodes estimated by CT and MRI after STN DBS surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20882302     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-010-0779-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  10 in total

1.  Carbon Nano-Structured Neural Probes Show Promise for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Applications.

Authors:  Corey E Cruttenden; Jennifer M Taylor; Shan Hu; Yi Zhang; Xiao-Hong Zhu; Wei Chen; Rajesh Rajamani
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2017-11-27

2.  Electrode position and the clinical outcome after bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation.

Authors:  Sun Ha Paek; Jee-Young Lee; Han-Joon Kim; Daehee Kang; Yong Hoon Lim; Mi Ryoung Kim; Cheolyoung Kim; Beom Seok Jeon; Dong Gyu Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Novel Composite Gold-Aluminum Electrode with Application to Neural Recording and Stimulation in Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners.

Authors:  Corey E Cruttenden; Mahdi Ahmadi; Yi Zhang; Xiao-Hong Zhu; Wei Chen; Rajesh Rajamani
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  The pros and cons of intraoperative CT scan in evaluation of deep brain stimulation lead implantation: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Domenico Servello; Edvin Zekaj; Christian Saleh; Claudio Pacchetti; Mauro Porta
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-08-02

5.  Accuracy of Intraoperative Computed Tomography in Deep Brain Stimulation-A Prospective Noninferiority Study.

Authors:  Naomi I Kremer; D L Marinus Oterdoom; Peter Jan van Laar; Dan Piña-Fuentes; Teus van Laar; Gea Drost; Arjen L J van Hulzen; J Marc C van Dijk
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-01-10

6.  Commentary: Using Directional Deep Brain Stimulation to Co-activate the Subthalamic Nucleus and Zona Incerta for Overlapping Essential Tremor/Parkinson's Disease Symptoms.

Authors:  Chengyuan Wu; Caio Matias
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Measurement of Lead Localization Accuracy Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Changgeng He; Feng Zhang; Linze Li; Changqing Jiang; Luming Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Methodology, outcome, safety and in vivo accuracy in traditional frame-based stereoelectroencephalography.

Authors:  Lars E van der Loo; Olaf E M G Schijns; Govert Hoogland; Albert J Colon; G Louis Wagner; Jim T A Dings; Pieter L Kubben
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  iElectrodes: A Comprehensive Open-Source Toolbox for Depth and Subdural Grid Electrode Localization.

Authors:  Alejandro O Blenkmann; Holly N Phillips; Juan P Princich; James B Rowe; Tristan A Bekinschtein; Carlos H Muravchik; Silvia Kochen
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.081

10.  Brain stimulation for arm recovery after stroke (B-STARS): protocol for a randomised controlled trial in subacute stroke patients.

Authors:  Eline C C van Lieshout; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Sebastiaan F W Neggers; H Bart van der Worp; Rick M Dijkhuizen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.