Literature DB >> 20882194

Negative pressure pulmonary oedema and haemorrhage, after a single breath-hold: Diaphragm the culprit?

John George Karippacheril1, Tim Thomas Joseph.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20882194      PMCID: PMC2943722          DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.68391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Anaesth        ISSN: 0019-5049


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, A 26-year-old, moderately built male, ASA PS1, no history of snoring, respiratory infection, bronchial asthma or allergies, with osteoblastic lesions of distal femur and L4-5 vertebrae, underwent closed vertebral biopsy in prone position under general anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane, nitrous oxide and oxygen. At the end of procedure, adequate neuromuscular reversal was achieved, as assessed by double burst stimulation on peripheral nerve monitor. An awake extubation was planned; however, on return of protective airway reflexes, patient started persistently coughing and bucking on the endotracheal tube. Through an oral airway, thorough suctioning was done prior to extubation. An episode of apparent breath-holding (held in inspiration, absent chest movements, with no capnographic trace after a downstroke, no audible stridor), lasting less than a minute after noticing it, was observed. Face mask ventilation was immediately initiated with difficulty. SpO2 suddenly dropped to 51% and heart rate increased to 108/min. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) with 100% O2 was immediately given with APL valve closed. SpO2 returned to 98% within a few seconds. Auscultation revealed bilateral fine crepitations. Ten milligram of IV frusemide was given on suspicion of negative pressure pulmonary oedema, IV dexamethasone 8 mg was also given. Intraoperatively, the patient received 1500 mL crystalloid, there was no major blood loss. Patient was shifted to post-operative care unit as SpO2 was stable at 98% on 6L/min O2 via facemask. Immediate chest X-ray was asked for. Thirty minutes after the episode, in the post-operative area, his room air saturation showed 77 to 81%. He was tachypneic (respiratory rate about 28 per minute) but not distressed, coarse crepitations were present bilaterally on auscultation, with expectoration of copious quantity of serosanguineous frothy sputum, progressing to several episodes of more sanguinous expectoration. Chest X-ray showed significant diffuse especially perihilar infiltrates, suggestive of pulmonary oedema and alveolar haemorrhage, with prominent gastric air shadow compared with a normal pre-operative chest X-ray [Figure 1 and 2]. ABG done on oxygen with 60% Venturi by face mask showed PaO2 63.7 mmHg, pH 7.45, PaCO2 29.7 mmHg, HCO3 20.4 mmol, Base excess (BE)-2.2. ICU care and non-invasive ventilation with 8 cm H2O PEEP and diuresis with IV frusemide 20 mg bolus was started. Ryle’s tube was inserted to decompress the stomach.
Figure 1

Pre-operative normal chest X-ray

Figure 2

Thirty-minute post-operative chest X-ray, showing diffuse infiltrates more in mid-zone perihilar region, obvious air shadow in gastric fundus

Pre-operative normal chest X-ray Thirty-minute post-operative chest X-ray, showing diffuse infiltrates more in mid-zone perihilar region, obvious air shadow in gastric fundus Frothy expectoration reduced within few hours, ABG showed improvement of PaO2 to 232 mmHg on FIO2 0.6, pH 7.47, PaCO2 31.8 mmHg, HCO3 22.7 mmol/L, BE 0.2. In 72 h, the patient was discharged with stable parameters, maintaining PaO2 of 105 to 106 mmHg on nasal prongs with 2 L/min O2 flow. Radiological features suggestive of alveolar haemorrhage persisted over the next few days [Figure3 and 4], even after clinical resolution of symptoms; room air SpO2 was 98% on third post-operative day.
Figure 3

Second post-operative day chest X-ray, showing prominent mid-zone perihilar infiltrates

Figure 4

Third post- operative day chest X-ray, showing resolving mid-zone perihilar infiltrates.

Second post-operative day chest X-ray, showing prominent mid-zone perihilar infiltrates Third post- operative day chest X-ray, showing resolving mid-zone perihilar infiltrates. Unrecognized negative pressure pulmonary oedema (NPPE) is associated with a higher morbidity and mortality, with progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome, hypoxemia and death.[1] In our case, we immediately appreciated fine crepitations over both sides of chest, which gave an early clue to the possibility of NPPE. The apparent breath-holding may have been a forceful sustained inspiration, produced by a powerful diaphragmatic contraction, held against a closed glottis (Muller’s manoeuvre), which can generate negative inspiratory pressures of up to -100 cm H2O.[2] Normal inspiratory efforts may not be sufficient to generate such an excessive negative pressure; diaphragmatic contractions may be the main contributing factor.[3] Whether subtle diaphragmatic contractions occurred during breath-holding, contributing to NPPE is not known. As previously reported in literature, our patient had clinical resolution of symptoms despite radiological persistence of perihilar infiltrates even after three days, suggestive of slow pathological resolution of alveolar haemorrhage or interstitial oedema.[45]
  5 in total

1.  Hemoptysis provoked by voluntary diaphragmatic contractions in breath-hold divers.

Authors:  E Kiyan; S Aktas; A S Toklu
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Negative pressure pulmonary edema as an unsuspected imitator of acute lung injury/ARDS.

Authors:  Gareth L Ackland; Michael G Mythen
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Negative pressure pulmonary hemorrhage.

Authors:  D R Schwartz; A Maroo; A Malhotra; H Kesselman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  Clinical and radiologic features of pulmonary edema.

Authors:  T Gluecker; P Capasso; P Schnyder; F Gudinchet; M D Schaller; J P Revelly; R Chiolero; P Vock; S Wicky
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Maximal inspiratory mouth pressures (PIMAX) in healthy subjects--what is the lower limit of normal?

Authors:  H Hautmann; S Hefele; K Schotten; R M Huber
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.415

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.