Jill V Radtke1, Lauren Terhorst, Susan M Cohen. 1. Department of Acute/Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. jvr5@pitt.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) in a sample of breast cancer survivors experiencing menopausal symptoms. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of MENQOL psychometric data from two larger parent studies investigating acupuncture for the relief of menopausal symptoms among breast cancer survivors. Reliability was assessed for each subscale of the MENQOL via (1) internal consistency reliability with Cronbach α and (2) test-retest reliability at multiple follow-up points with intraclass correlation coefficients and r. Convergent and discriminant validities were assessed via correlations of the vasomotor and psychosocial MENQOL subscales with select items in the Kupperman index and daily symptom diary. A principal components analysis was performed to determine construct validity. RESULTS: For each subscale, Cronbach α was 0.70 or greater. All subscale test-retest reliabilities at first follow-up were significant and at least moderately correlated (≥ 0.450; r's and intraclass correlation coefficients). Convergent validity was moderate between the vasomotor and psychosocial subscales and the symptom diary (r ≥ 0.410, P < 0.001) and larger between these domains and the Kupperman index (r ≥ 0.614, P < 0.001). In the same subscales, discriminant validity was supported by low, nonsignificant correlations (r ≤ 0.176, P > 0.05). The principal components analysis revealed a latent structure nearly identical to the prespecified instrument domains, with the exception of the physical domain. CONCLUSIONS: With results comparable with those obtained in previous psychometric work, the MENQOL seems to be a reliable and valid instrument to assess quality of life in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) in a sample of breast cancer survivors experiencing menopausal symptoms. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of MENQOL psychometric data from two larger parent studies investigating acupuncture for the relief of menopausal symptoms among breast cancer survivors. Reliability was assessed for each subscale of the MENQOL via (1) internal consistency reliability with Cronbach α and (2) test-retest reliability at multiple follow-up points with intraclass correlation coefficients and r. Convergent and discriminant validities were assessed via correlations of the vasomotor and psychosocialMENQOL subscales with select items in the Kupperman index and daily symptom diary. A principal components analysis was performed to determine construct validity. RESULTS: For each subscale, Cronbach α was 0.70 or greater. All subscale test-retest reliabilities at first follow-up were significant and at least moderately correlated (≥ 0.450; r's and intraclass correlation coefficients). Convergent validity was moderate between the vasomotor and psychosocial subscales and the symptom diary (r ≥ 0.410, P < 0.001) and larger between these domains and the Kupperman index (r ≥ 0.614, P < 0.001). In the same subscales, discriminant validity was supported by low, nonsignificant correlations (r ≤ 0.176, P > 0.05). The principal components analysis revealed a latent structure nearly identical to the prespecified instrument domains, with the exception of the physical domain. CONCLUSIONS: With results comparable with those obtained in previous psychometric work, the MENQOL seems to be a reliable and valid instrument to assess quality of life in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.
Authors: J R Hilditch; J Lewis; A Peter; B van Maris; A Ross; E Franssen; G H Guyatt; P G Norton; E Dunn Journal: Maturitas Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Morrie M Gelfand; Michèle Moreau; Normand J Ayotte; John R Hilditch; Betty A Wong; Catherine Y Lau Journal: Menopause Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Nadine Tchen; Helen G Juffs; Fiona P Downie; Qi-Long Yi; Hanxian Hu; Irene Chemerynsky; Mark Clemons; Michael Crump; Paul E Goss; David Warr; Mary E Tweedale; Ian F Tannock Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-11-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Melissa Mazor; Janine K Cataldo; Kathryn Lee; Anand Dhruva; Bruce Cooper; Steven M Paul; Kimberly Topp; Betty J Smoot; Laura B Dunn; Jon D Levine; Yvette P Conley; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 2.398
Authors: Caroline S Dorfman; Sarah S Arthur; Gretchen G Kimmick; Kelly W Westbrook; Paul Kelly Marcom; Cheyenne Corbett; Sara N Edmond; Rebecca A Shelby Journal: Menopause Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Ioana R Marian; Megan Goff; Jennifer A E Williams; Malvika Gulati; Mae Chester-Jones; Anne Francis; Marion Watson; Tonia L Vincent; Sue Woollacott; Charles Mackworth-Young; Victoria Glover; Dominic Furniss; Matthew Gardiner; Sarah E Lamb; Katy Vincent; Vicki S Barber; Joanna Black; Susan J Dutton; Fiona E Watt Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2021-06-24