OBJECTIVE: Prospective trials have shown improved perioperative outcomes with endovascular repair of thoracic aortic (TEVAR) pathologies compared with conventional surgery (OPEN). There are no long-term population data detailing the impact of TEVAR on practice patterns and results of treatment of descending thoracic aortic pathology (DTA), which are the goal of this study. METHODS: All procedures performed on the DTA captured in the Medicare database from 2004 to 2007 were identified by ICD-9 codes and stratified into OPEN and TEVAR cohorts. Outcomes included perioperative mortality (χ(2)) and 5-year actuarial survival. RESULTS: There were 11,166 patients identified (4838 [43%] TEVAR vs. 6328 [57%] OPEN) with 7247 (65%) nonruptured, degenerative thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA), 2701 (24%) descending aortic dissections, 1033 (9%) thoracic aortic ruptures, and 185 (2%) traumatic aortic tears. The distribution of cases changed significantly during the study period (P < 0.0001) with an increase in TEVAR, decrease in OPEN, and increase in total cases over time (). The perioperative mortality was lower in the TEVAR group for the entire population (360 [7.4%] TEVAR vs. 1175 [18.5%] OPEN, P < 0.0001), and for the individual pathologies: TAA (182/3529 [5%] TEVAR vs. 451/3718 [12%] OPEN, P < 0.001), dissections (76/833 [9%] TEVAR vs. 399/1868 [21%] OPEN, P < 0.001) and ruptures (87/368 [24%] TEVAR vs. 298/665 [45%] OPEN, P < 0.0001). The Kaplan-Meier curve significantly favored TEVAR for the entire cohort because of the early mortality of the OPEN cohort but the curves converged by 5 years. The 5-year survival by indication was: entire population (53.4% TEVAR vs. 53.3% OPEN, P < 0.0001), TAA (55.8% TEVAR vs. 59.7% OPEN, P = 0.84), dissection (58.2% TEVAR vs. 50.6% OPEN, P < 0.0001), ruptures (23.3% TEVAR vs. 25.3% OPEN, P = 0.001), and trauma (62.9% TEVAR vs. 50.9% OPEN, P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: There has been a significant increase in the use of TEVAR for management of diseases of the DTA. TEVAR offers a significant perioperative survival advantage when compared with OPEN regardless of the indication for repair. However, in the Medicare population, the 5-year survival is similar between the 2 cohorts.
OBJECTIVE: Prospective trials have shown improved perioperative outcomes with endovascular repair of thoracic aortic (TEVAR) pathologies compared with conventional surgery (OPEN). There are no long-term population data detailing the impact of TEVAR on practice patterns and results of treatment of descending thoracic aortic pathology (DTA), which are the goal of this study. METHODS: All procedures performed on the DTA captured in the Medicare database from 2004 to 2007 were identified by ICD-9 codes and stratified into OPEN and TEVAR cohorts. Outcomes included perioperative mortality (χ(2)) and 5-year actuarial survival. RESULTS: There were 11,166 patients identified (4838 [43%] TEVAR vs. 6328 [57%] OPEN) with 7247 (65%) nonruptured, degenerative thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA), 2701 (24%) descending aortic dissections, 1033 (9%) thoracic aortic ruptures, and 185 (2%) traumatic aortic tears. The distribution of cases changed significantly during the study period (P < 0.0001) with an increase in TEVAR, decrease in OPEN, and increase in total cases over time (). The perioperative mortality was lower in the TEVAR group for the entire population (360 [7.4%] TEVAR vs. 1175 [18.5%] OPEN, P < 0.0001), and for the individual pathologies: TAA (182/3529 [5%] TEVAR vs. 451/3718 [12%] OPEN, P < 0.001), dissections (76/833 [9%] TEVAR vs. 399/1868 [21%] OPEN, P < 0.001) and ruptures (87/368 [24%] TEVAR vs. 298/665 [45%] OPEN, P < 0.0001). The Kaplan-Meier curve significantly favored TEVAR for the entire cohort because of the early mortality of the OPEN cohort but the curves converged by 5 years. The 5-year survival by indication was: entire population (53.4% TEVAR vs. 53.3% OPEN, P < 0.0001), TAA (55.8% TEVAR vs. 59.7% OPEN, P = 0.84), dissection (58.2% TEVAR vs. 50.6% OPEN, P < 0.0001), ruptures (23.3% TEVAR vs. 25.3% OPEN, P = 0.001), and trauma (62.9% TEVAR vs. 50.9% OPEN, P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: There has been a significant increase in the use of TEVAR for management of diseases of the DTA. TEVAR offers a significant perioperative survival advantage when compared with OPEN regardless of the indication for repair. However, in the Medicare population, the 5-year survival is similar between the 2 cohorts.
Authors: Purav S Mody; Yun Wang; Arnar Geirsson; Nancy Kim; Mayur M Desai; Aakriti Gupta; John A Dodson; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2014-10-21
Authors: Michael P Robich; Robert Hagberg; Marc L Schermerhorn; Frank B Pomposelli; Michael C Nilson; Michelle L Gendron; Frank W Sellke; Roberto Rodriguez Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2012-03-02 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Douglas W Jones; Philip P Goodney; Brian W Nolan; Benjamin S Brooke; Mark F Fillinger; Richard J Powell; David H Stone Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Salvatore T Scali; Catherine K Chang; Robert J Feezor; Philip J Hess; Thomas M Beaver; Tomas D Martin; Thomas S Huber; Adam W Beck Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Eric K Shang; Derek P Nathan; Shanna R Sprinkle; Sarah C Vigmostad; Ronald M Fairman; Joseph E Bavaria; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Krishnan B Chandran; Benjamin M Jackson Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 4.330