Literature DB >> 20881657

Spinal kinematics and facet load transmission after total disc replacement.

Tomoyuki Takigawa1, Alejandro A Espinoza Orías, Howard S An, Satoshi Gohgi, Ranjith K Udayakumar, Keizo Sugisaki, Raghu N Natarajan, Markus A Wimmer, Nozomu Inoue.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: In vitro human cadaveric biomechanical study.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives were to determine the effect of total disc replacement (TDR) on kinematics, especially range of motion (ROM), helical axis of motion (HAM), and facet joint contact force. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Ball-and-socket type artificial discs are designed to mimic normal motion, but the biomechanical effect on kinematics has not been thoroughly clarified.
METHODS: Fourteen human cadaveric L4-L5 units were tested before and after TDR. In 7 specimens, facet contact forces were directly measured with thin-film piezoresistive load transducers inserted in the facet joints. In the other 7 specimens, the facet joint capsules were kept intact. Moments (±7.5 Nm) were applied in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation motion, with and without an axial compressive preload of 400 N. Three-dimensional motion was recorded, and each angular ROM and HAM were calculated.
RESULTS: Without axial compressive preload, the TDR did not produce significant differences in ROMs in all cases. However, under compressive preload, the TDR produced significantly larger ROMs for flexion (4.0° and 8.7°) and lateral bending (2.4° and 5.6°) (intact state and TDR, respectively). The TDR did not alter the HAM significantly except the location in lateral bending without compressive preload and the orientation in flexion/extension against horizontal plane. The location of HAM was slightly shifted caudally by the compressive preload in intact and TDR states. Despite the increased ROMs, the facet contact forces were not significantly altered by the TDR either with or without compressive preload (26 N and 27 N in extension, 41 N and 41 N in lateral bending, 117 N and 126 N in axial rotation).
CONCLUSION: TDR using a ball-and-socket type artificial disc significantly increased ROM under axial load and maintained the HAM with similar facet contact forces to the intact state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20881657     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e5352d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

Review 1.  Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions.

Authors:  Nicolas V Jaumard; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Meta-analyses comparing spine simulators with cadavers and finite element models by analysing range-of-motion data before and after lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Tobias Bohn; Susanne A J Lang; Stephanie Roll; Helene Schrader; Matthias Pumberger; Karin Büttner-Janz
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 10.479

3.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

4.  Postero-lateral disc prosthesis combined with a unilateral facet replacement device maintains quantity and quality of motion at a single lumbar level.

Authors:  Aniruddh N Nayak; Michael C Doarn; Roger B Gaskins; Chris R James; Andres F Cabezas; Antonio E Castellvi; Brandon G Santoni
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

5.  ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.

Authors:  Jack Zigler; Rolando Garcia
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-03-12

6.  Effect of facet-joint degeneration on the in vivo motion of the lower lumbar spine.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Zhang Liu; Chao Li; Shiwei Luo; Qi Lai; Shaobai Wang; Bin Zhang; Zongmiao Wan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.