Literature DB >> 20881638

Racial disparities on the use of invasive and noninvasive staging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Jennifer Marie Suga1, Danh V Nguyen, Sandra M Mohammed, Monica Brown, Royce Calhoun, Ken Yoneda, David R Gandara, Primo N Lara.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Racial disparities have been reported in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) staging and therapeutic outcomes. We investigated whether such disparities exist in the era of modern noninvasive staging modalities, including positron emission tomography scan use.
METHODS: NSCLC patients from the California Cancer Registry diagnosed between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2004, were included. The likelihood of obtaining invasive (thoracoscopy, bronchoscopy, and mediastinoscopy) and noninvasive staging procedures (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography scans), along with surgical resection, were analyzed using logistic regression adjusted for known confounders.
RESULTS: Of 13,762 NSCLC patients, 12,395 with adequate staging information were included. 10,217 patients (82%) were classified as white, 2178 patients (18%) were non-white, and 738 were black patients (6%). No association was seen between race and the use of either noninvasive (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02; p = 0.76) or invasive staging procedures (OR = 0.96; p = 0.44). However, compared with white patients, black patients had a lower likelihood of undergoing surgery, regardless of noninvasive (OR = 0.6; p <0.001) or invasive staging use (OR = 0.63; p = 0.02). There was no survival difference for those who underwent surgery between white and non-white patients, regardless of noninvasive (hazard ratio = 0.95; p = 0.45) or invasive staging (hazard ratio = 1.03; p = 0.79).
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to prior published work, we found no difference in rates of both invasive and noninvasive staging between white and non-white patients. However, non-white patients-particularly blacks-were less likely to receive surgery. The reason for the apparent difference in surgical rates could not be explained by the variables we evaluated. Thus, other factors such as personal preference or access to care require further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20881638     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181f69f22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  5 in total

1.  Disparities in lung cancer staging with positron emission tomography in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study.

Authors:  Michael K Gould; Ellen M Schultz; Todd H Wagner; Xiangyan Xu; Sharfun J Ghaus; Robert B Wallace; Dawn Provenzale; David H Au
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 15.609

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of positron-emission tomography-computed tomography in preoperative staging for nonsmall-cell lung cancer with resected monometastatic disease.

Authors:  Xiaohui Zeng; Liubao Peng; Chongqing Tan; Yunhua Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Racial disparities in the utilization of parathyroidectomy among patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: Evidence from a nationwide analysis of Medicare claims.

Authors:  Wilson M Alobuia; Tong Meng; Robin M Cisco; Dana T Lin; Insoo Suh; Manjula Kurella Tamura; Amber W Trickey; Electron Kebebew; Carolyn D Seib
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  Socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lynne F Forrest; Jean Adams; Helen Wareham; Greg Rubin; Martin White
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 5.  A narrative review of socioeconomic disparities in the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Aaron M Delman; Allison M Ammann; Kevin M Turner; Dennis M Vaysburg; Robert M Van Haren
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.895

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.