Literature DB >> 20881516

Intermediate Results of the Prestige LP Cervical Disc Replacement: Clinical and Radiological Analysis With Minimum Two-Year Follow-up.

Chan Wearn Benedict Peng1, Wai Mun Yue, Abdul Basit, Chang Ming Guo, Benjamin Phak Boon Tow, John Li Tat Chen, Maran Nidu, William Yeo, Seang Beng Tan.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: present results of Prestige LP artificial cervical disc replacement (ADR). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: motion preservation with ADR can potentially reduce adjacent segment degeneration. METHODS.: Forty patients with 59 Prestige LP ADR were analyzed. Cervical range of motion, Neck Disability Index, Visual Analogue, Short Form-36, Modified American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores and radiographs were evaluated. Clinical results were compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
RESULTS: there were 21 females and 19 males. Mean age was 43.9 years. Mean follow-up was 2.9 years. Of the patients, 62.5% had single level replacement-mainly C56 level (56%); 52.5% had myelopathy and 47.5% radiculopathy; 50% of neural compression was due to herniated disc, 45% due to spondylosis, and 5% due to both. There was significant improvement in the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons and Visual Analogue scores (P < 0.05) at 6 months and 2 years. There was significant improvement in the Neck Disability Index from a mean of 42.2 preoperation to 16.4 at 6 months and 15.2 at 2 years (P < 0.05). The mean Japanese Orthopedic Association score improved significantly from 14.7 preoperation to 15.7 at 6 months and 15.6 at 2 years (P < 0.05). There was significant improvement in all aspects of the Short Form-36 scores except general health (P < 0.05) at 6 months and 2 years. There was no significant difference in the clinical outcomes between ADR and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Segmental alignment (mean 8°, 14°, and 13° lordotic at preoperation, 6 months, and 2 years postoperation, respectively) and global alignment (mean 15.7°, 16.2°, and 17.3° lordotic at preoperation, 6 months, and 2 years postoperation, respectively) were maintained. Dynamic radiographs showed significant segmental motion with a 6 month's mean motion of 11.1° and a 2-year mean motion of 13.9° (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: prestige LP ADR showed significant improvement in clinical outcomes at 2 years. It restores segmental lordosis and preserves segmental motion up to 2 years postoperation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20881516     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d76f99

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Adjacent segment degeneration following ProDisc-C total disc replacement (TDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): does surgeon bias effect radiographic interpretation?

Authors:  Eric B Laxer; Craig D Brigham; Bruce V Darden; P Bradley Segebarth; R Alden Milam; Alfred L Rhyne; Susan M Odum; Leo R Spector
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Differences between arthroplasty and anterior cervical fusion in two-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Li-Yu Fay; Wen-Cheng Huang; Tzu-Yun Tsai; Jau-Ching Wu; Chin-Chu Ko; Tsung-Hsi Tu; Ching-Lan Wu; Henrich Cheng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Five-year results of cervical disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry.

Authors:  Emin Aghayev; Christian Bärlocher; Friedrich Sgier; Mustafa Hasdemir; Klaus F Steinsiepe; Frank Wernli; François Porchet; Oliver Hausmann; Aymen Ramadan; Gianluca Maestretti; Uwe Ebeling; Michal Neukamp; Christoph Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Quality of Life Following Prestige LP Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in a Prospective Multicountry Study.

Authors:  Jan Stulik; Marton Ronai; Bruno Rudinsky; Daniel Zarzycki; Dariusz Latka; Jiri Matejka; Saleh Baeesa
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06-30

5.  Cervical total disc replacement using a novel compressible prosthesis: Results from a prospective Food and Drug Administration-regulated feasibility study with 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Carl Lauryssen; Domagoj Coric; Thomas Dimmig; David Musante; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Harrison A Stubbs
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01

6.  Uncovertebral anatomic midline targeting for cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Drew A Bednar
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2012-03

7.  Kinematic analysis following implantation of the PRESTIGE LP.

Authors:  Izabela Kowalczyk; Navjot Chaudhary; Neil Duggal
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2013-12-01

8.  Comparative Analysis between Total Disc Replacement and Posterior Foraminotomy for Posterolateral Soft Disc Herniation with Unilateral Radiculopathy : Clinical and Biomechanical Results of a Minimum 5 Years Follow-up.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tae Kim; Dae-Chul Cho; Joo-Kyung Sung; Young-Baeg Kim; Du Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-12-29

9.  Cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige-LP for the treatment of contiguous 2-level cervical degenerative disc disease: 5-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Xinlin Gao; Yi Yang; Hao Liu; Yang Meng; Junfeng Zeng; Tingkui Wu; Ying Hong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Activ C cervical disc replacement for myelopathy.

Authors:  L McGonagle; S Cadman; S D Chitgopkar; L Canavan; M O'Malley; I M Shackleford
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2011-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.