OBJECTIVE: T-cell receptor (TCR) gene therapy is an approach being considered for HIV-1, but epitope mutation is a significant barrier. We assessed whether HIV-specific TCR can be modified to have broader coverage of epitope variants by recombining polymorphisms between public clonotype TCR sequences. DESIGN: Public clonotype TCRs recognizing the same epitope often differ by polymorphisms in their third complementarity determining regions (CDR3). We assessed whether novel combinations of such polymorphisms could improve TCR recognition of epitope variation. METHODS: A TCR recognizing the HLA A*0201-restricted epitope SLYNTVATL (Gag 77-85, SL9) was engineered to have combinations of four polymorphisms in the CDR3 regions compared to another SL9-specific TCR. These novel TCRs were screened for functional avidities against SL9 epitope variants and abilities to mediate cytotoxic T-lymphocyte suppression of HIV-1 containing the same epitope variants. RESULTS: The TCRs varied modestly in functional avidities for SL9 variants, due to alterations in affinity. This translated to differences in antiviral activities against HIV-1 when functional avidity changes crossed the previously defined threshold required for efficient recognition of HIV-1-infected cells. Higher avidity TCR mutants had generally broader recognition of SL9 variants. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that rationally targeted increases in functional avidities can be utilized to maximize the antiviral breadth of transgenic TCRs. In contrast to previously reported random mutagenesis to markedly increase functional avidities, tuning through recombining naturally occurring polymorphisms may offer a more physiologic approach that minimizes the risk of deleterious TCR reactivities.
OBJECTIVE:T-cell receptor (TCR) gene therapy is an approach being considered for HIV-1, but epitope mutation is a significant barrier. We assessed whether HIV-specific TCR can be modified to have broader coverage of epitope variants by recombining polymorphisms between public clonotype TCR sequences. DESIGN: Public clonotype TCRs recognizing the same epitope often differ by polymorphisms in their third complementarity determining regions (CDR3). We assessed whether novel combinations of such polymorphisms could improve TCR recognition of epitope variation. METHODS: A TCR recognizing the HLA A*0201-restricted epitope SLYNTVATL (Gag 77-85, SL9) was engineered to have combinations of four polymorphisms in the CDR3 regions compared to another SL9-specific TCR. These novel TCRs were screened for functional avidities against SL9 epitope variants and abilities to mediate cytotoxic T-lymphocyte suppression of HIV-1 containing the same epitope variants. RESULTS: The TCRs varied modestly in functional avidities for SL9 variants, due to alterations in affinity. This translated to differences in antiviral activities against HIV-1 when functional avidity changes crossed the previously defined threshold required for efficient recognition of HIV-1-infected cells. Higher avidity TCR mutants had generally broader recognition of SL9 variants. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that rationally targeted increases in functional avidities can be utilized to maximize the antiviral breadth of transgenic TCRs. In contrast to previously reported random mutagenesis to markedly increase functional avidities, tuning through recombining naturally occurring polymorphisms may offer a more physiologic approach that minimizes the risk of deleterious TCR reactivities.
Authors: Richard A Morgan; Mark E Dudley; John R Wunderlich; Marybeth S Hughes; James C Yang; Richard M Sherry; Richard E Royal; Suzanne L Topalian; Udai S Kammula; Nicholas P Restifo; Zhili Zheng; Azam Nahvi; Christiaan R de Vries; Linda J Rogers-Freezer; Sharon A Mavroukakis; Steven A Rosenberg Journal: Science Date: 2006-08-31 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Fred W Peyerl; Heidi S Bazick; Michael H Newberg; Dan H Barouch; Joseph Sodroski; Norman L Letvin Journal: J Virol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Kirsten B J Scholten; Duco Kramer; Esther W M Kueter; Marcus Graf; Thomas Schoedl; Chris J L M Meijer; Marco W J Schreurs; Erik Hooijberg Journal: Clin Immunol Date: 2006-02-02 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Brenna C Simons; Scott E Vancompernolle; Rita M Smith; Jie Wei; Louise Barnett; Shelly L Lorey; Dirk Meyer-Olson; Spyros A Kalams Journal: J Immunol Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Jacques Thèze; Lisa A Chakrabarti; Benoît Vingert; Filippos Porichis; Daniel E Kaufmann Journal: Clin Immunol Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Riyasat Ali; Jeffrey Babad; Antonia Follenzi; John A Gebe; Michael A Brehm; Gerald T Nepom; Leonard D Shultz; Dale L Greiner; Teresa P DiLorenzo Journal: Immunology Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 7.397
Authors: J Babad; G Mukherjee; A Follenzi; R Ali; B O Roep; L D Shultz; P Santamaria; O O Yang; H Goldstein; D L Greiner; T P DiLorenzo Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Justine Sunshine; Moon Kim; Jonathan M Carlson; David Heckerman; Julie Czartoski; Stephen A Migueles; Janine Maenza; M Juliana McElrath; James I Mullins; Nicole Frahm Journal: J Virol Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Thomas D Norton; Anjie Zhen; Takuya Tada; Jennifer Kim; Scott Kitchen; Nathaniel R Landau Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Ayub Ali; Flavia Chiuppesi; Minh Nguyen; Mary Ann Hausner; Jenny Nguyen; Mindy Kha; Angelina Iniguez; Felix Wussow; Don J Diamond; Otto O Yang Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 5.226