Literature DB >> 20881013

Effect of poplar genotypes on mycorrhizal infection and secreted enzyme activities in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal roots.

P E Courty1, J Labbé, A Kohler, B Marçais, C Bastien, J L Churin, J Garbaye, F Le Tacon.   

Abstract

The impact of ectomycorrhiza formation on the secretion of exoenzymes by the host plant and the symbiont is unknown. Thirty-eight F(1) individuals from an interspecific Populus deltoides (Bartr.)×Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & A. Gray) controlled cross were inoculated with the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor. The colonization of poplar roots by L. bicolor dramatically modified their ability to secrete enzymes involved in organic matter breakdown or organic phosphorus mobilization, such as N-acetylglucosaminidase, β-glucuronidase, cellobiohydrolase, β-glucosidase, β-xylosidase, laccase, and acid phosphatase. The expression of genes coding for laccase, N-acetylglucosaminidase, and acid phosphatase was studied in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal root tips. Depending on the genes, their expression was regulated upon symbiosis development. Moreover, it appears that poplar laccases or phosphatases contribute poorly to ectomycorrhiza metabolic activity. Enzymes secreted by poplar roots were added to or substituted by enzymes secreted by L. bicolor. The enzymatic activities expressed in mycorrhizal roots differed significantly between the two parents, while it did not differ in non-mycorrhizal roots. Significant differences were found between poplar genotypes for all enzymatic activities measured on ectomycorrhizas except for laccases activity. In contrast, no significant differences were found between poplar genotypes for enzymatic activities of non-mycorrhizal root tips except for acid phosphatase activity. The level of enzymes secreted by the ectomycorrhizal root tips is under the genetic control of the host. Moreover, poplar heterosis was expressed through the enzymatic activities of the fungal partner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20881013      PMCID: PMC2993916          DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


Introduction

The fine roots of tree species in temperate and boreal forests are symbiotically associated with fungi, forming a composite organ called ectomycorrhiza (ECM) (Smith and Read, 2008). The establishment and the functioning of ECM lead to complex morphological and physiological changes in both the plant and the fungus (Martin and Nehls, 2009; Courty ). The ECM symbiosis has been described as a mutualistic association where the autotrophic plant supplies photosynthates to the heterotrophic fungus, which in turn supplies water and nutrients to the host (Smith and Read, 2008). Several studies also have shown that ectomycorrhizal fungi (ECMf) are able to produce extracellular enzymes, such as proteases, involved in the direct mobilization of nutrients from organic substrates (Courty , 2006, 2010; Lindahl ; Koide ). In addition, a given species may contribute to significant functional variations through metabolic activities (Buée ; Courty ). The ecological fitness and the metabolic activity of ECMf depend on their genotypes, environmental factors (van der Heijden and Sanders, 2002; Smith and Read, 2008), host plant genotypes (Barker ; Linderman and Davis, 2004), and the interactions between all these factors (Khasa ; Gehring ; Karst ). Recent studies also suggest that the host plant genome may play a role in determining the dominant mycorrhizal type in dually colonized hosts (van der Heijden and Kuyper, 2001; Khasa ). However, no studies have simultaneously examined the effect of host plant genotypes and the metabolic activity of one ECMf species in controlled conditions. In the Laccaria bicolor/poplar ECM symbiosis, Tagu have shown that the host genotype impacts on root colonization by the fungus. The heritability of mycorrhizal colonization of poplar was also studied (Tagu , 2005). However, the metabolic activity of one ECM fungal genotype colonizing different genotypes of the same host species was never studied. In the present study, the use of poplar as the host tree model was motivated by the availability of large genetic and genomic resources for this species (Brunner ; Tuskan ). Moreover, heritability and variability of physiological parameters [i.e. water use efficiency, dry weight and leaf maximum area (LMA)] at the family level have been intensively studied in poplar (Marron ; Dillen ). In this study, a standard set of seven enzymatic activities routinely used in field studies were selected as relevant functional traits (Courty ). The enzyme activity of a secreted laccase, an oxidative enzyme involved in the degradation of recalcitrant plant residues, such as lignin, five secreted glycosyl hydrolases (cellobiohydrolase, β-glucosidase, β-xylosidase, β-glucuronidase, and N-acetylglucosaminidase) acting on polysaccharides, and a phosphomonoesterase involved in the mobilization of phosphorus from soil organic matter were assessed. Laccaria bicolor has a small set of glycosyl hydrolases able to hydrolyse plant cell wall polysaccharides (Martin ). However, its genome encodes several carbohydrate-active enzymes able to degrade bacterial, fungal, and animal polysaccharides (Martin ). The impact of the host genotype on the ECM metabolic activity is unknown. Here, the responding functional trait in focus is the capacity to produce secreted or cell wall-bound enzymes. The first objective was to determine whether the enzymatic activities expressed in mycorrhizal roots differed significantly between two parents, Populus deltoides and P. trichocarpa, and different poplar hybrid genotypes (P. deltoides×P. trichocarpa). The second objective was to determine the effect of host genotypes on fungal traits by measuring the heritability of enzymatic activities in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal root tips and by assessing a possible heterosis for these traits among the progeny.

Materials and methods

Plant material, strain, and culture conditions

Poplar material consisted of 38 F1 individuals from an interspecific P. deltoides (female clone from Illinois, no. 73028-62) and P. trichocarpa (male clone from Washington, no. 101-74) controlled cross (family 54B) (Tagu , 2005). The ability of the two parents and the 38 breeds to form mycorrhizas was tested by inoculating them with L. bicolor S238N (Di Battista ; Tagu ). The 38 F1 genotypes were chosen at random among the 336 genotypes used for the construction of a genetic map (Cervera ; Jorge ). The L. bicolor S238N fungal strain, coming from the INRA-Nancy collection of ECMf, was maintained on Pachlewski's. This model fungal strain was chosen for its ability to form ECMs with poplar and for the avaibility of genomic resources (Tagu ; Martin ). The inoculum of L. bicolor S238N was prepared by aseptically growing the mycelium in a peat–vermiculite nutrient mix in glass jars for 2 months in the dark at 25 °C, and it was kept at 4 °C for 2 months before use (Le Tacon and Bouchard, 1986).

Inoculation

Cuttings of one internode of each of the 38 poplar progeny and the two parents were rooted and individually inoculated at the same time, in 1.0 l pots containing a mixture of fungal inoculum (1:9 v/v) and calcinated attapulgite (Oil Dri US Special) for 12 weeks, in a greenhouse during spring with day–night temperatures of 28 °C and 15 °C, respectively. Plants were watered during the whole experiment until measurements were taken. From the second month, a low N, low P nutrient solution was applied weekly (Frey-Klett ). In order to control environmental heterogeneity of the greenhouse, eight replicates were examined for each poplar genotype and were randomly distributed in eight blocks. Each block contained one pot of each of the 38 progeny and the two parents.

Root colonization

Entire root systems, except roots present at 1 cm depth from the collar, were carefully washed under tap water and cut into ∼1 cm pieces. For each root system, 100 randomly selected root tips were examined and assessed as mycorrhizal or non-mycorrhizal under a stereomicroscope (magnification ×40) for calculation of ECM percentages.

Chlorophyll content, leaf morphological measurement, and dry weight

Before harvesting plants, the chlorophyll a and b content was measured with a Minolta SPAD chlorophyll meter (Minolta Corp., Ramsey, NJ, USA). Three SPAD measurements were done on three leaves of each plant and then averaged (Monje and Bugbee, 1992). To convert SPAD measures into chlorophyll content, a standard curve was built by extracting chlorophylls with the dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) extraction technique (Monje and Bugbee, 1992; Richardson ). Total leaf chlorophyll concentration (mg cm−2) of the extracts was calculated from the equation: 0.0202A645+0.00802A663. SPAD measurements were then converted to chlorophyll content using a third-order polynomial equation: –0.0064SPAD3+0.5895SPAD2+2.0891SPAD+10.024. Once mycorrhizal infection had been determined, leaves, stems, and roots were separated. The leaves were placed in plastic bags and kept at 4 °C until leaf morphological measurements were completed. The leaf area (cm2) of all leaves of each plantlet was measured by using a LI-COR 3100 (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). Leaves, stems, and roots were then dried at 70 °C for 1 week. The LMA was calculated for each clone using the relationship between the area of each leaf and its corresponding dry weight.

Enzymatic activity profiling of ectomycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal root tips

One mycorrhizal root tip and one non-mycorrhizal root tip were collected from each of the 320 cuttings in order to determine their potential enzymatic activities, using the high-throughput photometric and fluorimetric microplate assays described and detailed in Courty , and applied in previous studies (Buée ; Courty ). As the variability of enzyme activities among ECM tips within a root system is low, one tip is sufficient to obtain a representative value (Courty ). Each well of a 96-well microtitration plate contained either one ectomycorrhizal root tip or one non-ectomycorrhizal root tip. Seven activities were successively measured on root tips: β-xylosidase (EC 3.2.1.37), β-glucuronidase (EC 3.2.1.31), cellobiohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.91), N-acetylglucosaminidase (EC 3.2.1.14), β-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.3), acid phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.2), and laccase (EC 1.10.3.2). The enzymes activities were expressed as pmol mm−2 min−1 of developed surface area of root tips. The developed surface area of the root tips was measured after scanning and image analysis using the Mac/Win Rhizo software (Regent Instruments, Quebec City, Canada). They correspond to the activities of enzymes present on the surface of the roots or mycorrhiza mantles and released into the medium during the incubation.

Whole-genome expression oligoarray analyses

Genes coding for laccase (Lac), N-acetylglucosaminidase (Nag), and acid phosphatase (Pap) were already known and had been characterized in the genome of L. bicolor and P. trichocarpa. As the genes involved in β-xylosidase, β-glucuronidase, cellobiohydrolase, and β-glucosidase activity had not been characterized, it was not possible to measure the corresponding transcript expression. Accumulation of predicted Lac, Nag, and Pap transcripts was detected in free-living mycelium of L. bicolor S238N, and in ectomycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal root tips of poplar using the NimbleGen L. bicolor whole-genome expression oligoarray v2 (Martin ) and the NimbleGen P. trichocarpa whole-genome expression oligoarray (Tuskan ). Data are available at the GEO platform GPL2699. The L. bicolor 4-plex whole genome expression array contained 18 653 gene models with three oligonucleotide probes for each gene model. For 4702 gene models, technical duplicates were included on the oligoarray (A Kohler and F Martin, unpublished results). Average expression levels were calculated for each gene from the independent probes and were used for further analysis. To estimate the signal background and the resulting threshold value for significant expression, the mean intensity of 2032 random probes present on the microarray was calculated. Gene models with expression exceeding the threshold by ≥3 were considered to be transcribed. Raw array data were filtered for non-specific probes and renormalized using ARRAYSTAR software (DNASTAR). Three biological replicates were used. Therefore, the reported gene expression values corresponded to the mean intensity of hybridization signals obtained for the specific oligonucleotide probes. A Student t-test with false discovery rate (FDR; Benjamini–Hochberg) multiple testing corrections was applied on the data (P <0.05), using ARRAYSTAR sofware (DNASTAR).

Statistical analysis

The percentage of mycorrhizal colonization was transformed by arcsin √X/100 function prior to analysis of variance (ANOVA). β-xylosidase, β-glucuronidase, cellobiohydrolase, N-acetylglucosaminidase β-glucosidase, acid phosphatase, and laccase activities, root, shoot, and stem dry weight, and LMA were also submitted to ANOVA. The following mixed linear model was applied on an individual basis to detect significant differences among the clones:where μ is the overall mean, B is the block effect (fixed), G is the genotype effect (random), and ϵ is the random residual error. Restricted maximum likelihood estimates of genetic, block, and residual variance components (σ2G, σ2B, and σ2ϵ) were computed, and, for each trait, individual broad sense heritability (h2) was estimated as follows:where n is the average number of replicates per genotype. Standard deviations (SD) were derived from classic estimation of SD for a ratio x/y where x=σ2G and y=σ2G+σ2ϵ/n. All analyses were performed with the statistical programs JMP 5.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and R version 1.8.0 (R Development Core Team, 2006, www.R-project.org). The genetic coefficient of variation (CVG) was used (Cornelius, 1994) to compare the relative amounts of genetic variation of traits with different means: Relationships between the different traits were also analysed by Pearson linear correlations. The developed projected area of mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal root tips were compared between genotypes by ANOVA.

Results

A total of 320 plants were harvested and studied in this experiment. Three dead plants were not used in the analysis. No significant block effect was found for any measured traits.

Poplar ecophysiological traits

Significant differences (P <0.001) were found between plant genotypes for all measured traits (chlorophyll content, LMA, and stem and root dry weight). Significant differences were found between the parents for all measured traits except for LMA.

Effect of poplar genotype on root colonization by L. bicolor

Twelve weeks after inoculation, progeny and parental clones were only colonized by L. bicolor. No other contaminant ECMf were found on roots. The two parental genotypes differed significantly in their mycorrhizal development, P. trichocarpa exhibiting a rate of colonization of 40±8%, and P. deltoides a rate of 16±4%. The percentage root colonization of the different genotypes (progeny) varied from 12±8% to 64±6%, with an average of 31% (Fig. 1). The ANOVA showed a significant genotype effect and no block effect. The developed projected area of mycorrhizal or non-mycorrhizal root tips was not significantly different between genotypes.
Fig. 1.

Percentage root colonization of the different poplar clones (n=40). Genotypes are ranked in mean percentage of root colonization. Bars represent the SE (n=8). Grey corresponds to Populus trichocarpa (male) and black to Populus deltoides (female).

Percentage root colonization of the different poplar clones (n=40). Genotypes are ranked in mean percentage of root colonization. Bars represent the SE (n=8). Grey corresponds to Populus trichocarpa (male) and black to Populus deltoides (female).

Enzymatic activity patterns of the parental and the hybrid root system

For each plant, the seven enzymatic activities were measured successively on one mycorrhizal and one non-mycorrhizal root tip (40 poplar genotypes×8 plant replicates×2 root tips). Mycorrhizal root tips never lost their ability to secrete the seven enzymes under the test conditions, even if sometimes this was at a very low level (e.g. for β-xylosidase, β-glucuronidase, and laccase). The seven enzymatic activities expressed in non-mycorrhizal roots did not differ significantly between the two parents (Table 1a). The seven enzymatic activities measured on ECM root tips differed significantly between the two parents (Table 1a): five activities (β-xylosidase, cellobiohydrolase, β-glucosidase, acid phosphatase, and laccase) had a higher level in P. trichocarpa and two (N-acetylglucosaminidase and β-glucuronidase) had a higher level in P. deltoides.
Table 1.

Average enzymatic activities of ectomycorrhizal and non-Mycorrhizal root tips of poplar

(a) Comparison of the parents: P. trichocarpa (Pt) and P. deltoides (Pd)
Mycorrhizal root tips
Non-mycorrhizal root tips
PtPdPtPd
β-xylosidase25.43±1.6714.04±1.17*0.94±0.520.46±0.14
β-glucuronidase23.29±1.8235.47±1.47*0.69±0.410.81±0.51
N-acetylglucosaminidase297.83±13.86412.81±17.72*3.02±0.704.1±1.42
Cellobiohydrolase86.51±2.2122.42±1.61*0.57±0.170.62±0.24
β-glucosidase358.94±16.96119.77±9.77*4.13±1.472.78±1.45
Acid phosphatase368.46±19.47155.94±12.84*25.33±5.1525.77±4.47
Laccase5.64±0.954.76±0.72*00

Enzyme activities are expressed as pmol mm−2 min−1 (Courty ). Mean and SE are given for each activity. An asterisk indicates a significant difference (P <0.001). The effect of plant genotype on enzyme activities was assessed for mycorrhizal root tips and non-mycorrhizal root tips.

Average enzymatic activities of ectomycorrhizal and non-Mycorrhizal root tips of poplar Enzyme activities are expressed as pmol mm−2 min−1 (Courty ). Mean and SE are given for each activity. An asterisk indicates a significant difference (P <0.001). The effect of plant genotype on enzyme activities was assessed for mycorrhizal root tips and non-mycorrhizal root tips. Enzyme activity patterns of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal root tips of the parents and of their progeny were different (Fig. 2). Significant differences were found between plant genotypes for all activities measured on ECM root tips, except for laccase activity (Table 1b). No significant differences were found between plant genotypes for any activities measured on non-mycorrhizal root tips, except for acid phosphatase activity (Table 1b).
Fig. 2.

Values of the seven enzymatic activities successively measured on one root tip of the different poplar cuttings (40 clones, eight replicates per clone) either colonized (a) or non-colonized (b) by L. bicolor. No laccase activity was detected on non-mycorrhizal root tips. Genotypes are ranked by mean activity. Enzyme activities are expressed as pmol mm−2 min−1 (Courty ). Bars represent the SE (n=8). Grey corresponds to Populus trichocarpa (male) and black to Populus deltoides (female).

Values of the seven enzymatic activities successively measured on one root tip of the different poplar cuttings (40 clones, eight replicates per clone) either colonized (a) or non-colonized (b) by L. bicolor. No laccase activity was detected on non-mycorrhizal root tips. Genotypes are ranked by mean activity. Enzyme activities are expressed as pmol mm−2 min−1 (Courty ). Bars represent the SE (n=8). Grey corresponds to Populus trichocarpa (male) and black to Populus deltoides (female). Six of the enzymatic activities differed significantly between mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal roots, while no laccase activity could be detected in non-mycorrhizal roots (Table 1b). Compared with non-mycorrhizal root tips, N-acetylglucosaminidase activity was increased by >100-fold in mycorrhizas, while β-glucuronidase, cellobiohydrolase, and β-glucosidase activities were multiplied by a factor ranging between 50 and 100, and β-xylosidase and acid phosphatase between 15 and 50 (Table 1b).

Heritability

Heritability values (h2) of plant phenotypic characters ranged from 0.21 to 0.48. The highest values of heritability were found for LMA (0.48±0.01), chlorophyll content (0.45±0.01), and stem and leaf dry weight (0.43±0.01 and 0.50±0.01, respectively). The lowest value was found for root dry weight (0.21±0.01). A value of 0.45±0.02 was found for the percentage of mycorrhizal colonization. Heritability values of enzymatic activities were similar for ectomycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal root tips, except for laccase activity, which was not detected on non-mycorrhizal root tips (0.29±0.01 in mycorrhizal root tips; 0 in non-mycorrhizal root tips). The highest heritabilities were found for N-acetylglucosaminidase (mycorrhizal root tips, 0.42±0.01; non-mycorrhizal root tips, 0.40±0.01), acid phosphatase (mycorrhizal root tips, 0.41±0.01; non-mycorrhizal root tips, 0.40±0.01), β-glucosidase (mycorrhizal root tips, 0.36±0.01; non-mycorrhizal root tips, 0.34±0.01), and cellobiohydrolase (mycorrhizal root tips, 0.33±0.02; non-mycorrhizal root tips, 0.31±0.02) activity. The lowest value was found for β-glucuronidase activity (mycorrhizal root tips 0.04±0.01; non-mycorrhizal root tips, 0.04±0.01). A medium value was found for β-xylosidase activity (mycorrhizal root tips, 0.16±0.01; non-mycorrhizal root tips, 0.19±0.01).

Heterosis

For each trait, the ratio between the average of the hybrids and the best parent (a) or between the average of the hybrids and the average of the two parents (b) was calculated (Supplementary Table S1 available at JXB online). The LMA exhibited a high positive heterosis (a= +46, b= +51), while the leaf dry weight exhibited a negative heterosis (a= – 41, b= –36). The percentage mycorrhizal colonization also exhibited a positive heterosis (a= +25, b= +75). In mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal root tips, all the enzymatic activities displayed a positive heterosis at least for the b values, with the exception of laccase activity in mycorrhizal root tips (a= –15, b= –8) and acid phosphatase activity in non-mycorrhizal root tips (a= –4, b= –3).

Gene expression

Expression of the genes Lcc, Nag, and Pap was assessed by whole-genome expression oligoarray analyses in poplar and L. bicolor (Table 2). In poplar, gene expression was compared between non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal roots. Thirty-two laccases (Lcc1–Lcc32) were detected in poplar. Three of them are mitochondrial and 27 have a signal peptide meaning that they belong to secreted pathways. Of the 32 genes coding for laccases in poplar, the expression of 11 could be assessed. Of the 11 expressed and also putatively expressed, one (Lcc6) was significantly up-regulated in mycorrhizas and two were down-regulated in mycorrhizas (Lcc16 and Lcc31). Two N-acetylglucosaminidase (Nag1 and Nag2) genes were expressed and a signal peptide was found for both of them. The expression of Nag1 and Nag2 was not modified by mycorrhizal establishment. Seven acid phosphatase genes (Pap1–Pap7) were expressed and a signal peptide was found for five of them (Pap2, Pap3, Pap5, Pap6, and Pap7). Two (Pap5 and Pap7) were significantly up-regulated in mycorrhizas.
Table 2.

Quantification by exon expression array of the transcript levels of laccase (Lcc), N-acetylglucosaminidase (Nag), and acid phosphatase (Pap) genes under different conditions

(a) Poplar genes. The NimbleGen array analysis was carried out using P. trichocarpa root tips with or without mycorrhizal infection by L. bicolor. Transcript levels in non-mycorrhizal root tips were used as the control values. NT, not transcribed; –, gene not on the array or no reliable probe left.
Protein IDSignal-PTarget-PRatio
Lcc182039024S1.0
Lcc255796224S
Lcc379764622SNT
Lcc457693123S
Lcc576247325S
Lcc676756328S4.3*
Lcc721929029S1.4
Lcc87596861.2
Lcc965308924S
Lcc1081917726SNT
Lcc1179788831SNT
Lcc1257947832S
Lcc1323593532S
Lcc1483190034SNT
Lcc1523593032S
Lcc1676817726S0.4*
Lcc1754800832S
Lcc1878355932SNT
Lcc1982236632S0.4
Lcc2056085323SNT
Lcc2159253323S
Lcc2283260331S0.3
Lcc23738903M
Lcc2457453330S
Lcc2577774823S0.8
Lcc26738893M
Lcc2757185833S
Lcc2857498528S
Lcc29205176M1.6
Lcc3056975828S
Lcc3142067217S0.4*
Lcc327745190.2
Nag177297227S1.4
Nag220291625S1.5
Pap18211551.4
Pap283126928S0.6
Pap381876827S0.5
Pap48160411.4
Pap527272522S2.1*
Pap625948623S1.9
Pap782575332S1.8*

The length (bp) of the signal peptide (Signal-P) was predicted with Signal P 3.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/). The prediction of the subcellular location of the proteins (Target-P) was performed with TargetP 1.1 available on the webpage (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/); M, mitochondrial; S, secreted; –, unknown.

Three biological replicates were used for each treatment with NimbleGen oligoarrays (v.2.0; NG2). A Cyber-T test was performed on the mean for each transcript (*P <0.05).

Quantification by exon expression array of the transcript levels of laccase (Lcc), N-acetylglucosaminidase (Nag), and acid phosphatase (Pap) genes under different conditions The length (bp) of the signal peptide (Signal-P) was predicted with Signal P 3.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/). The prediction of the subcellular location of the proteins (Target-P) was performed with TargetP 1.1 available on the webpage (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/); M, mitochondrial; S, secreted; –, unknown. Three biological replicates were used for each treatment with NimbleGen oligoarrays (v.2.0; NG2). A Cyber-T test was performed on the mean for each transcript (*P <0.05). For L. bicolor, gene expression was compared between mycorrhizal roots of P. trichocarpa and P. deltoides, and mycelium growing in pure culture. On the nine laccases previously described (Courty ), one was mitochondrial (Lcc5) and eight had a signal peptide meaning that they belong to secreted pathways. Seven of these laccase genes were expressed, while two were not (Lcc2 and Lcc7). Lcc5 was only expressed in the free-living mycelium. Lcc9 was significantly down-regulated in P. deltoides and P. trichocarpa mycorrhizas, while Lcc6 was significantly down-regulated only in P. deltoides mycorrhizas and Lcc8 was up-regulated in P. trichocarpa mycorrhizas. The other laccases were not significantly regulated. The only acid phosphatase (Pap1) expressed displayed a peptide signal. Its expression was not significantly different between mycorrhizas and free-living mycelium. Among the two N-acetylglucosaminidase (Nag1 and Nag2) expressed, only Nag2 exhibited a signal peptide. The expression of Nag2 was higher in the free-living mycelium than in P. trichocarpaL. bicolor and P. deltoidesL. bicolor mycorrhizas.

Correlations between the different traits

No poplar trait was correlated with enzymatic activities of non-mycorrhizal root tips (Table 3). LMA, and stem and root dry weight were not correlated with any activities from either ectomycorrhizal or non-mycorrhizal root tips (Table 3). Chlorophyll content was significantly negatively correlated with β-xylosidase, cellobiohydrolase, and β-glucosidase activities, three enzymes involved in cellulose and hemicellulose catabolism.
Table 3.

Correlation matrix (Pearson correlation r) between poplar traits, enzymatic activities, and percentage mycorrhizal colonization

%ChlDW stemDW rootsLMAM XylM GlrM NagM CelM GlsM PhoM LacNM XylNM GlrNM NagNM CelNM GlsNM Pho
1−0.090.200.200.060.220.140.130.070.130.040.050.050.130.02−0.020.060.13
Chl1−0.12−0.12−0.01–0.19−0.01−0.07–0.18–0.18−0.050.01−0.000.020.080.080.000.11
DW stem10.42–0.28−0.05−0.040.04−0.07−0.13−0.02−0.01−0.010.090.120.00−0.020.01
DW roots1–0.200.050.040.06−0.010.02−0.030.06−0.070.00−0.09−0.09−0.10−0.02
LMA10.140.090.140.060.100.120.13−0.08−0.13−0.04−0.07−0.060.04
M Xyl10.120.410.640.560.250.250.070.02−0.030.11−0.030.09
M Glr10.270.180.150.300.150.010.07−0.12−0.13−0.070.15
M Nag10.350.330.470.31−0.11−0.08−0.04−0.01–0.190.32
M Cel10.690.220.160.06−0.040.020.05−0.060.05
M Gls10.250.270.01−0.05−0.070.06−0.050.09
M Pho10.290.010.08−0.010.020.010.36
M Lac1−0.12−0.05−0.14−0.06−0.100.21
NM Xyl10.470.270.430.35−0.03
NM Glr10.250.390.290.04
NM Nag10.240.31−0.03
NM Cel10.28−0.03
NM Gls10.07
NM Pho1

Abbreviations: %, percentage mycorrhizal colonization; Chl, chlorophyll (g m−2); DW, dry weight (g); LMA, keaf maximum area (m2); M, mycorrhizal root tips; NM, non-mycorrhizal root tips; Pho, acid phosphatase; Nag, N-acetylglucosaminidase; Gls, β-glucosidase; Cel, cellobiohydrolase; Xyl, β-xylosidase; Lac, laccase; Glr, β-glucuronidase.

Correlation is significant for P <0.01 (values in bold).

Correlation matrix (Pearson correlation r) between poplar traits, enzymatic activities, and percentage mycorrhizal colonization Abbreviations: %, percentage mycorrhizal colonization; Chl, chlorophyll (g m−2); DW, dry weight (g); LMA, keaf maximum area (m2); M, mycorrhizal root tips; NM, non-mycorrhizal root tips; Pho, acid phosphatase; Nag, N-acetylglucosaminidase; Gls, β-glucosidase; Cel, cellobiohydrolase; Xyl, β-xylosidase; Lac, laccase; Glr, β-glucuronidase. Correlation is significant for P <0.01 (values in bold). Enzymatic activities of ectomycorrhizal root tips were not correlated with those of non-mycorrhizal root tips. All the enzymatic activities of mycorrhizal root tips were correlated with each other, except for laccase activity. Similarly, except for acid phosphatase, all the enzymatic activities of non-mycorrhizal root tips were correlated with each other. β-xylosidase activity of mycorrhizal roots was the only activity positively correlated with the percentage of mycorhizal infection (Table 3). Stem and root dry weights were also significantly correlated with the percentage of root colonization.

Discussion

Enzymatic activities of non-mycorrhizal root tips and mycorrhizas

The potential activities of enzymes involved in organic matter breakdown or organic phosphorus mobilization measured on poplar root tips colonized or not by L. bicolor were significantly different. Here, it was found that the ectomycorrhizal complex adds to or substitutes for enzymes secreted from poplar roots. Compared with non-mycorrhizal root tips, N-acetylglucosaminidase activity is 100-fold greater in mycorrhizas, while β-glucuronidase, cellobiohydrolase, and β-glucosidase activities were between 50- and 100-fold greater, and β-xylosidase and acid phosphatase were between 15- and 50-fold greater. Moreover, laccase activity could not be detected on non-mycorrhizal roots. By degrading organic compounds, including those from their own mycelia, and channelling nutrients directly to the host tree, ECMf have the capacity to shorten mineralization pathways in which free-living decomposers are involved. It is well known that ECMf are able to secrete enzymes which allow the release of nutrients from soil organic matter (Cullings and Courty, 2009; Courty ). However, the aim of this study was not to understand the role of ECMf in the release of nutrients. The enzymes measured should be considered as functional traits to study the effects of soil or host tree parameters on ECMf. It is the first time that the breadth of the modifications induced by the symbiotic association on the potential enzymatic secretion by the root system has been measured.

Expression of genes involved in enzymatic activities

Although the complete sequences of the P. trichocarpa and L. bicolor genome are available, all of the genes putatively encoding the proteins responsible for the measured activities were not identified. The correspondence between enzymatic assay and gene expression could be determined for three of them: laccase (Lcc), N-acetylglucosaminidase (Nag), and acid phosphatase (Pho). Two genes code for a secreted N-acetylglucosaminidase (Nag1 and Nag2) involved in chitin catabolism in poplar and also two in L. bicolor. In this work, poplar Nag1 and Nag2 were expressed in both root tips and mycorrhizas but were not regulated by the symbiosis. In contrast, the expression of L. bicolor Nag1 and Nag2 was down-regulated in mycorrhizas. Nevertheless, the activity of N-acetylglucosaminidase was 130-fold greater in the mycorrhizas compared with non-mycorrhizal root tips. The following assumptions can be made: (i) L. bicolor N-acetylglucosaminidases are secreted outside the mycelium of the sheath in mycorrhizas, while the poplar N-acetylglucosaminidases are not secreted outside the root tips; (ii) L. bicolor N-acetylglucosaminidases can be involved in nitrogen mobilization from chitin by degrading its own mycelia and in defence against soil pathogenic fungi; and (iii) L. bicolor can have the same ability as Trichoderma asperellum (Ramot ) to store a high amount of this enzyme in an active form and secrete it when the mycelium senses the substrate. In the L. bicolor genome, nine genes coding for laccases were characterized (Courty ). In this experiment, six putatively secreted genes were expressed and three (Lcc1, Lcc3, and Lcc4) were not significantly regulated by symbiosis. One (Lcc8) was significantly overexpressed in mycorrhizas and two (Lcc6 and Lcc9) were underexpressed. In the P. trichocarpa genome, 32 genes code for laccases, 27 display a signal peptide meaning that they belong to secreted pathways, and, in this work, 20 were expressed in root tips. Despite the large number of laccase genes which were expressed, no laccase activity was detected by the ABTS test on non-mycorrhizal root tips. This means that poplar laccases are not secreted in the rhizosphere. In Arabidopsis thaliana, only a few of the laccase genes were expressed in a pattern that could be considered consistent with a major role for these enzymes in lignin deposition (McCaig ). Poplar laccases seems to be not cell wall bound, or secreted outside the cells. They are probably involved in the polymerization of lignin precursors or in other functions. Acid phosphatases, able to free phosphate groups from complex organic compounds, are widespread in living organisms. Both ECMf and plants secrete acid phosphatases in the rhizosphere. In most of the studies, mycorrhizas secrete more phosphatases than non-colonized roots (Colpaert ; Conn and Dighton, 2000). Nevertheless, there are some exceptions (Cumming, 1996). ECMf exhibit high phosphatase release in their environment, particularly under mineral phosphorus deficiency (Dighton, 1983; Nygren and Rosling, 2009). The L. bicolor genome comprises only one gene coding for a putative secreted acid phosphatase, while the P. trichocarpa genome contains five. The phosphatase Pap1 from L. bicolor was not regulated by symbiosis. Pap5 and Pap7 from poplar were significantly highly expressed under mycorrhizal conditions, whereas the three others (Pap2, Pap3, and Pap6) were not significantly expressed. Ezawa have shown, on Tagetes petala in symbiosis with Archaeospora leptoticha, that the level of transcripts of the T. petala acid phosphatase (TpPAP1) was increased 8-fold by A. leptoticha colonization. The present results support the hypothesis of Ezawa on the fungal activation of the low-phosphate adaptation system of the plant partner and seem to show that the same mechanism of plant phosphatase activation exists in both arbuscular mycorrhizas and ECMs. Another hypothesis could be involved in the explanation of the differences in enzyme secretion between non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal roots. Inside the mycorrhizas, the root tissues, being isolated from the external medium by the fungal sheath, probably contribute poorly to enzyme secretion. The ability to degrade cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin is widespread among fungi and soil bacteria (i.e. Streptomyces sp., Bacillus sp., and Cellulomonas sp.; Lynd ). However, it is assumed that most of the cellulose degradation in soil is performed by fungi (de Boer ). Even if it has been shown that laccase genes were present in bacteria (Kellner ), bacterial lignin degradation appears to be negligible in terrestrial environments compared with fungal lignin degradation (Peng ). This is supported by the fact that no laccase activity was found on non-mycorrhizal root tips. Among bacteria, Collimonas sp. display chitinolytic activities (de Boer ). However, these bacteria are present under specific conditions, completely different from greenhouse experiments with artificial substrate. Thus, despite the fact that this experiment was performed in non-axenic conditions, it can be assumed that the secreted enzymes that were measured in mycorrhizas were mainly due to fungal activity.

Host genetic control of ECM enzyme secretion

The enzymatic activities expressed in mycorrhizal roots differed significantly between the two parents, while it did not differ in non-mycorrhizal roots. Significant differences were found between poplar genotypes for all enzymatic activities measured on ECMs except for laccase activity. In contrast, no significant differences were found between poplar genotypes for enzymatic activities of non-mycorrhizal root tips, except for acid phosphatase activity. Heritability values of enzymatic activities were similar for ectomycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal root tips, except for β-glucuronidase in both types of roots and for laccase that was not detected on non-mycorrhizal root tips. It is remarkable to find a high heritability value among the poplar genotypes for the enzymatic secretions of mycorrhizal roots, which are mainly due to fungal activity. Several previous studies have demonstrated significant genetic variability within plants and/or fungal species for symbiotic capability in mycorrhizal interactions. Rosado reported a high value of heritability for colonization of Pinus ellilotii by the ECMf Pisolithus tinctorius, and moderate heritability for the development of P. tinctorius extramatrical mycelium. Eucalyptus grandis, E. globulus, E. marginata, and Pinus muricata varied greatly in their growth response to different Pisolithus and Rhizopogon genotypes, respectively (Tonkin ; Burgess ; Piculell ). Tagu have already shown that the ability of poplar to form ECMs is under its genetic control. Other studies with contrasting results have found that the plant genotype can play a dominant role in controlling the associated soil microbial communities (Mari ; Korkama ). Short-term experiment have either shown variations in mycorrhizal colonization, in microbial and in mycorrhizal communities (Gehring and Whitham, 2002; Gehring ; Barbour ; Lojewski ), or few differences in arbuscular fungal and bacterial communities (Bever ; Madritch and Hunter, 2002). In the present study, the degree of fungal enzymatic secretion is modulated according to the poplar genotype. An explanation could be that the host genotype controls the amount of fungal tissue in the mantle and that enzyme activity is determined by the amount of fungal tissue present on the root. However, no significant differences were found in the projected area of mycorrhized or non-mycorrhized root tips between genotypes. Therefore, this means that the amount of mycelium in the root tip is similar whatever the genotype. These results suggest the potential for the poplar genome to drive the microbial–plant interaction, to create environments to which ECMf can respond and that could be explained by the ‘extended phenotype’ phenomenom (Schweitzer ; Whitham ). As defined by Whitham , the heritable genetic variation within individual species (poplar in this study) has community and ecosystem consequences. In addition, a high positive heterosis was found for the capacity of poplar to form mycorrhizas (h2 a= +4 %). Positive heterosis was found for characters such as LMA, dry weight of roots, and for five of the seven enzymatic activities of mycorrhizal roots. Heterosis for poplar hybrids is a well-known phenomenon (Li and Wu, 1997; Marron ). Heterosis is determined by non-mutually exclusive mechanisms, including genome-wide dominance complementation, locus-specific overdominance effects, and epistasis, although the relative contribution of each of these mechanisms is still unclear (Lippman and Zamir, 2007). However, it is also the first time that it is has been shown that plant heterosis could be expressed through the physiological activity of the fungal partner.

Conclusion

The genetic diversity in tree species can influence fluxes of nutrients as well as interactions with soil microorganisms. Assessing tree genotype×environment interactions is a major challenge in functional ecology. In this study, the data linked and quantified the general relationships between poplar plant genetics, ECM fungal infection, and physiological parameters. In the association L. bicolor/poplar, variations in plant and fungal responses in these controlled conditions illustrate the broad plasticity of the interaction. In this study, the role of poplar genetics in determining both poplar growth characteristics and fungal activities has been highlighted.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online. Heterosis calculated as the ratio between the average of the hybrids and the best parent or between the average of the hybrids and the average of the two parents.
  31 in total

Review 1.  Heterosis: revisiting the magic.

Authors:  Zachary B Lippman; Dani Zamir
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Ectomycorrhizal fungi and the biotrophy-saprotrophy continuum.

Authors:  Roger T Koide; Jori N Sharda; Joshua R Herr; Glenna M Malcolm
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  A new hypothesis on the strategy for acquisition of phosphorus in arbuscular mycorrhiza: up-regulation of secreted acid phosphatase gene in the host plant.

Authors:  Tatsuhiro Ezawa; Masahito Hayatsu; Masanori Saito
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  Dense genetic linkage maps of three Populus species (Populus deltoides, P. nigra and P. trichocarpa) based on AFLP and microsatellite markers.

Authors:  M T Cervera; V Storme; B Ivens; J Gusmão; B H Liu; V Hostyn; J Van Slycken; M Van Montagu; W Boerjan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Diversity of leaf traits related to productivity in 31 Populus deltoides x Populus nigra clones.

Authors:  Nicolas Marron; Marc Villar; Erwin Dreyer; Didier Delay; Eric Boudouresque; Jean-Michel Petit; Francis M Delmotte; Jean-Marc Guehl; Franck Brignolas
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.196

6.  Genetic architecture of qualitative and quantitative Melampsora larici-populina leaf rust resistance in hybrid poplar: genetic mapping and QTL detection.

Authors:  V Jorge; A Dowkiw; P Faivre-Rampant; C Bastien
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Regulation of two homodimer hexosaminidases in the mycoparasitic fungus Trichoderma asperellum by glucosamine.

Authors:  Ofir Ramot; Ada Viterbo; Dana Friesem; Amos Oppenheim; Ilan Chet
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 3.886

8.  Characterization of the 5-carboxyvanillate decarboxylase gene and its role in lignin-related biphenyl catabolism in Sphingomonas paucimobilis SYK-6.

Authors:  Xue Peng; Eiji Masai; Hirotaka Kitayama; Kyo Harada; Yoshihiro Katayama; Masao Fukuda
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Genetic basis of aboveground productivity in two native Populus species and their hybrids.

Authors:  Nathan R Lojewski; Dylan G Fischer; Joseph K Bailey; Jennifer A Schweitzer; Thomas G Whitham; Stephen C Hart
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.196

10.  Interactions of biotic and abiotic environmental factors in an ectomycorrhizal symbiosis, and the potential for selection mosaics.

Authors:  Bridget J Piculell; Jason D Hoeksema; John N Thompson
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 7.431

View more
  12 in total

1.  Genetic host-tree effects on the ectomycorrhizal community and root characteristics of Norway spruce.

Authors:  S M Velmala; T Rajala; M Haapanen; A F S Taylor; T Pennanen
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.387

2.  Optimized assay and storage conditions for enzyme activity profiling of ectomycorrhizae.

Authors:  Karin Pritsch; Pierre Emanuel Courty; Jean-Louis Churin; Benoit Cloutier-Hurteau; Muhammad Arif Ali; Coralie Damon; Myriam Duchemin; Simon Egli; Jana Ernst; Laurence Fraissinet-Tachet; Francisco Kuhar; Elvira Legname; Roland Marmeisse; Alex Müller; Petia Nikolova; Martina Peter; Claude Plassard; Franck Richard; Michael Schloter; Marc-André Selosse; Alain Franc; Jean Garbaye
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.387

3.  Functional profiling and distribution of the forest soil bacterial communities along the soil mycorrhizosphere continuum.

Authors:  S Uroz; P E Courty; J C Pierrat; M Peter; M Buée; M P Turpault; J Garbaye; P Frey-Klett
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Structure and expression profile of the phosphate Pht1 transporter gene family in mycorrhizal Populus trichocarpa.

Authors:  Verónica Loth-Pereda; Elena Orsini; Pierre-Emmanuel Courty; Frédéric Lota; Annegret Kohler; Loic Diss; Damien Blaudez; Michel Chalot; Uwe Nehls; Marcel Bucher; Francis Martin
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Interspecies-cooperations of abutilon theophrasti with root colonizing microorganisms disarm BOA-OH allelochemicals.

Authors:  Margot Schulz; Dieter Sicker; Oliver Schackow; Lothar Hennig; Andrey Yurkov; Meike Siebers; Diana Hofmann; Ulrich Disko; Cristina Ganimede; Letizia Mondani; Vincenzo Tabaglio; Adriano Marocco
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2017-08-08

6.  Variation among matsutake ectomycorrhizae in four clones of Pinus sylvestris.

Authors:  Lu-Min Vaario; Jinrong Lu; Arto Koistinen; Arja Tervahauta; Tuija Aronen
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.387

7.  Ectomycorrhizal colonization and diversity in relation to tree biomass and nutrition in a plantation of transgenic poplars with modified lignin biosynthesis.

Authors:  Lara Danielsen; Gertrud Lohaus; Anke Sirrenberg; Petr Karlovsky; Catherine Bastien; Gilles Pilate; Andrea Polle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Multiple multi-copper oxidase gene families in basidiomycetes - what for?

Authors:  Ursula Kües; Martin Rühl
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.236

9.  Growth response of drought-stressed Pinus sylvestris seedlings to single- and multi-species inoculation with ectomycorrhizal fungi.

Authors:  Tabea Kipfer; Thomas Wohlgemuth; Marcel G A van der Heijden; Jaboury Ghazoul; Simon Egli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spatial patterns of ectomycorrhizal assemblages in a monospecific forest in relation to host tree genotype.

Authors:  Christa Lang; Reiner Finkeldey; Andrea Polle
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.