Literature DB >> 20880858

Antimicrobial strength increases with group size: implications for social evolution.

Christine Turnbull1, Stephen Hoggard, Michael Gillings, Chris Palmer, Adam Stow, Doug Beattie, David Briscoe, Shannon Smith, Peter Wilson, Andrew Beattie.   

Abstract

We hypothesize that aggregations of animals are likely to attract pathogenic micro-organisms and that this is especially the case for semisocial and eusocial insects where selection ultimately led to group sizes in the thousands or even millions, attracting the epithet 'superorganism'. Here, we analyse antimicrobial strength, per individual, in eight thrips species (Insecta: Thysanoptera) that present increasing innate group sizes and show that species with the largest group size (100-700) had the strongest antimicrobials, those with smaller groups (10-80) had lower antimicrobial activity, while solitary species showed none. Species with large innate group sizes showed strong antimicrobial activity while the semisocial species showed no activity until group size increased sufficiently to make activity detectable. The eusocial species behaved in a similar way, with detectable activity appearing once group size exceeded 120. These analyses show that antimicrobial strength is determined by innate group size. This suggests that the evolution of sociality that, by definition, increases group size, may have had particular requirements for defences against microbial pathogens. Thus, increase in group size, accompanied by increased antibiotic strength, may have been a critical factor determining the 'point of no return', early in the evolution of social insects, beyond which the evolution of social anatomical and morphological traits was irreversible. Our data suggest that traits that increase group size in general are accompanied by increased antimicrobial strength and that this was critical for transitions from solitary to social and eusocial organization.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20880858      PMCID: PMC3061164          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  5 in total

1.  Inbreeding ancestors: the role of sibmating in the social evolution of gall thrips.

Authors:  M J McLeish; T W Chapman; B J Crespi
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  An enhanced miniaturized assay for antimicrobial prospecting.

Authors:  Shannon M Smith; Andrew J Beattie; Michael R Gillings; Marita P Holley; Adam J Stow; Christine L Turnbull; Peter D Wilson; David A Briscoe
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Antimicrobial defences increase with sociality in bees.

Authors:  Adam Stow; David Briscoe; Michael Gillings; Marita Holley; Shannon Smith; Remko Leys; Tish Silberbauer; Christine Turnbull; Andrew Beattie
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Darwin's 'one special difficulty': celebrating Darwin 200.

Authors:  Joan M Herbers
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Host-driven diversification of gall-inducing Acacia thrips and the aridification of Australia.

Authors:  Michael J McLeish; Thomas W Chapman; Michael P Schwarz
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 7.431

  5 in total
  12 in total

1.  Antifungal activity in thrips soldiers suggests a dual role for this caste.

Authors:  Christine Turnbull; Holly Caravan; Thomas Chapman; David Nipperess; Siobhan Dennison; Michael Schwarz; Andrew Beattie
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Evolving communicative complexity: insights from rodents and beyond.

Authors:  Kimberly A Pollard; Daniel T Blumstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Social immunity and the evolution of group living in insects.

Authors:  Joël Meunier
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Gram-negative bacteria associated with a dominant arboreal ant species outcompete phyllosphere-associated bacteria species in a tropical canopy.

Authors:  M R Bitar; V D Pinto; L M Moreira; S P Ribeiro
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  No evidence for social immunity in co-founding queen associations.

Authors:  Timothée Brütsch; Amaury Avril; Michel Chapuisat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials.

Authors:  Clint A Penick; Omar Halawani; Bria Pearson; Stephanie Mathews; Margarita M López-Uribe; Robert R Dunn; Adrian A Smith
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Social immunity in honeybees-Density dependence, diet, and body mass trade-offs.

Authors:  Ben Jones; Emily Shipley; Kathryn E Arnold
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Bacterial exposure leads to variable mortality but not a measurable increase in surface antimicrobials across ant species.

Authors:  Omar Halawani; Robert R Dunn; Amy M Grunden; Adrian A Smith
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Evidence for reduced immune gene diversity and activity during the evolution of termites.

Authors:  Shulin He; Thorben Sieksmeyer; Yanli Che; M Alejandra Esparza Mora; Petr Stiblik; Ronald Banasiak; Mark C Harrison; Jan Šobotník; Zongqing Wang; Paul R Johnston; Dino P McMahon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Primordial enemies: fungal pathogens in thrips societies.

Authors:  Christine Turnbull; Peter D Wilson; Stephen Hoggard; Michael Gillings; Chris Palmer; Shannon Smith; Doug Beattie; Sam Hussey; Adam Stow; Andrew Beattie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.