BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that nurse detection of delirium has low sensitivity compared to a research diagnosis. As yet, no study has examined the use of nurse-observed delirium symptoms combined with research-observed delirium symptoms to diagnose delirium. Our specific aims were: (1) to describe the effect of using nurse-observed symptoms on the prevalence of delirium symptoms and diagnoses in long-term care (LTC) facilities, and (2) to compare the predictive validity of delirium diagnoses based on the use of research-observed symptoms alone with those based on research-observed and nurse-observed symptoms. METHODS: Residents aged 65 years and over of seven LTC facilities were recruited into a prospective study. Using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), research assistants (RAs) interviewed residents and nurses to assess delirium symptoms. Delirium symptoms were also abstracted independently from nursing notes. Outcomes measured at five month follow-up were: death, the Hierarchic Dementia Scale (HDS), the Barthel ADL scale, and a composite outcome measure (death, or a 10-point decline in either the HDS or the ADL score). RESULTS: The prevalence of delirium among 235 LTC residents increased from 14.0% (using research-observed symptoms only) to 24.7% (using research- and nurse-observed symptoms). The relative risks (and 95% confidence intervals) for prediction of the composite outcome, after adjustment for covariates, were: 1.43 (0.88, 1.96) for delirium using research-observed symptoms only; 1.77 (1.13, 2.28) for delirium using research- and nurse-observed symptoms, in comparison with no delirium. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of delirium symptoms observed by nurses not only increases the detection of delirium in LTC facilities but improves the prediction of outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that nurse detection of delirium has low sensitivity compared to a research diagnosis. As yet, no study has examined the use of nurse-observed delirium symptoms combined with research-observed delirium symptoms to diagnose delirium. Our specific aims were: (1) to describe the effect of using nurse-observed symptoms on the prevalence of delirium symptoms and diagnoses in long-term care (LTC) facilities, and (2) to compare the predictive validity of delirium diagnoses based on the use of research-observed symptoms alone with those based on research-observed and nurse-observed symptoms. METHODS: Residents aged 65 years and over of seven LTC facilities were recruited into a prospective study. Using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), research assistants (RAs) interviewed residents and nurses to assess delirium symptoms. Delirium symptoms were also abstracted independently from nursing notes. Outcomes measured at five month follow-up were: death, the Hierarchic Dementia Scale (HDS), the Barthel ADL scale, and a composite outcome measure (death, or a 10-point decline in either the HDS or the ADL score). RESULTS: The prevalence of delirium among 235 LTC residents increased from 14.0% (using research-observed symptoms only) to 24.7% (using research- and nurse-observed symptoms). The relative risks (and 95% confidence intervals) for prediction of the composite outcome, after adjustment for covariates, were: 1.43 (0.88, 1.96) for delirium using research-observed symptoms only; 1.77 (1.13, 2.28) for delirium using research- and nurse-observed symptoms, in comparison with no delirium. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of delirium symptoms observed by nurses not only increases the detection of delirium in LTC facilities but improves the prediction of outcomes.
Authors: Mildred Ramirez; Beverly Watkins; Jeanne A Teresi; Stephanie Silver; Gail Sukha; Gabriel Bortagis; Kimberly Van Haitsma; Mark S Lachs; Karl Pillemer Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Margaret R Puelle; Cyrus M Kosar; Guoquan Xu; Eva Schmitt; Richard N Jones; Edward R Marcantonio; Zara Cooper; Sharon K Inouye; Jane S Saczynski Journal: J Gerontol Nurs Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 1.254
Authors: Flavio E Nacul; Nicolas Paul; Claudia D Spies; Henriette Sechting; Thomas Hecht; Jörn S Dullinger; Sophie K Piper; Alawi Luetz; Felix S Balzer; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Anna Karinina Sa; Carolina Barros Ferreira da Costa; Lisa Eymold; Chokri Chenitir; Björn Weiss Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 2.430
Authors: Pia Urfer Dettwiler; Franziska Zúñiga; Stefanie Bachnick; Beatrice Gehri; Jos F M de Jonghe; Wolfgang Hasemann Journal: Eur Geriatr Med Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 3.269
Authors: Najma Siddiqi; Francine Cheater; Michelle Collinson; Amanda Farrin; Anne Forster; Deepa George; Mary Godfrey; Elizabeth Graham; Jennifer Harrison; Anne Heaven; Peter Heudtlass; Claire Hulme; David Meads; Chris North; Angus Sturrock; John Young Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 10.668