Literature DB >> 20880197

Surgical management of lymph-node-positive prostate cancer: improves symptomatic control.

Lucas R Wiegand1, Mike Hernandez, Louis L Pisters, Philippe E Spiess.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Study Type--Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? There is a paucity of data regarding symptomatic local progression of patients treated with radical prostatectomy in the setting of lymph-node-positive prostate cancer. Our retrospective study shows that radical prostatectomy with adjuvant hormonal therapy improves local control of patients in this cohort.
OBJECTIVE: • To assess the impact of primary surgical therapy on local control for patients with lymph-node-positive prostate cancer.
METHODS: • A retrospective analysis from January 1982 to January 2001 identified 192 patients treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP, N= 87), hormonal ablative therapy (ADT, N= 74), or RRP plus adjuvant hormones (RRP + ADT, N= 31). • Statistical analyses were conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test, chi-squared or Fisher's exact test, log-rank test and logistic regression with the statistical significance level set at P < 0.05.
RESULTS: • The incidence of local relapse in the three treatment groups (RRP, ADT and RRP + ADT) was 40.2%, 59.5% and 12.9%, respectively. • Among those with local relapse, the incidence of symptomatic local relapse (defined as local symptoms secondary to locally recurrent prostate cancer) was 25.7%, 75.0% and 50.0%, respectively. • Logistic regression analysis used to identify predictors of local relapse indicated that patients treated with ADT (OR = 1.96; P= 0.270) had higher odds of having a local relapse whereas patients treated with RRP + ADT (OR = 0.20; P= 0.032) had significantly lower odds of having a local relapse compared with patients treated with RRP (reference group) after adjusting for other significant predictors such as increases in serum PSA at diagnosis (OR = 1.09; P= 0.018) and biochemical failure after primary therapy (OR = 48.3; P < 0.001). • Logistic regression analysis used to identify predictors of symptomatic local relapse, among patients having had a relapse, indicated that patients treated with RRP + ADT (OR = 2.90; P= 0.322) had higher odds of having a symptomatic local relapse whereas patients treated with ADT alone (OR = 8.67; P < 0.001) had significantly higher odds of having a symptomatic local relapse compared with patients treated with RRP (reference group).
CONCLUSIONS: • Radical prostatectomy (with adjuvant hormonal therapy) provides improved local control in patients with lymph-node-positive prostate cancer. • This important endpoint must be considered when determining the optimal treatment of patients with node-positive disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20880197     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09657.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  12 in total

1.  Long-term PSA-free survival and castration-free survival with delayed antiandrogen therapy in patients with one versus two or more positive nodes at prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michele Lodde; Louis Lacombe; Angelo Naselli; Paolo Puppo; Michael Mian; Yves Fradet
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Integrating chemohormonal therapy and surgery in known or suspected lymph node metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  A J Zurita; L L Pisters; X Wang; P Troncoso; P Dieringer; J F Ward; J W Davis; C A Pettaway; C J Logothetis; L C Pagliaro
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 3.  Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in metastatic prostate cancer: Does it really make sense?

Authors:  Romain Mathieu; Stephan M Korn; Karim Bensalah; Gero Kramer; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Oncological effect of palliative transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with advanced prostate cancer: a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Se Young Choi; Jeman Ryu; Dalsan You; In Gab Jeong; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Platinum-based chemotherapy for variant castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ana M Aparicio; Andrea L Harzstark; Paul G Corn; Sijin Wen; John C Araujo; Shi-Ming Tu; Lance C Pagliaro; Jeri Kim; Randall E Millikan; Charles Ryan; Nizar M Tannir; Amado J Zurita; Paul Mathew; Wadih Arap; Patricia Troncoso; Peter F Thall; Christopher J Logothetis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Androgen-deprivation therapy versus radical prostatectomy as monotherapy among clinically localized prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Jinan Liu; Lizheng Shi; Oliver Sartor; Richard Culbertson
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel J Stevens; Prasanna Sooriakumaran
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-12

Review 8.  Early versus deferred androgen suppression therapy for patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer after local therapy with curative intent: a systematic review.

Authors:  Frank Kunath; Bastian Keck; Gerta Rücker; Edith Motschall; Bernd Wullich; Gerd Antes; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Extended lymph node dissection in robotic radical prostatectomy: Current status.

Authors:  Sameer Chopra; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Inderbir Gill; Monish Aron
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

10.  Cytoreductive surgery for men with metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nikolas Katelaris; Declan Murphy; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Athos Katelaris; Daniel Moon
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2015-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.