Literature DB >> 20880131

Cumulative summation graphs are a useful tool for monitoring positive surgical margin rates in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Andrew K Williams1, Venu Chalasani, Carlos H Martínez, Erica Osbourne, Larry Stitt, Jonathan I Izawa, Stephen E Pautler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: • To explore the usefulness of cumulative summation (CUSUM) graphs for monitoring positive surgical margin (PSM) rates during a surgeon's transition from open to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: • Data were prospectively collected from patients undergoing RARP by a single surgeon. • Preoperatively all patients were either low or moderate risk under the D'Amico classification system. • A CUSUM graph was charted retrospectively to analyse the PSM rate in patients undergoing RARP for pathological stage T2 (pT2) disease. • Acceptable and unacceptable PSM rates were set at 10% and 15% respectively.
RESULTS: • From a cohort of 226 patients, 158 patients with pT2 disease were selected. The mean (range) age of these patients was 59.2 (39-73) years, the median (range) Gleason score was 6 (4-9), the mean (range) PSA was 6.43 (0.52-17.5) ng/mL and the mean (range) prostate volume was 44 (18-120) cm(3). In all, 21 patients had PSMs (13%). • CUSUM graphs were produced and clearly demonstrated the change in PSM rate over time.
CONCLUSION: • CUSUM graphs are a novel and useful visual representation of the learning curve for surgeons. • PSM rates in patients with pT2 disease are a good outcome to monitor using CUSUM graphs as they are binary and lack the confounding factors associated with other outcomes such as continence and erectile dysfunction. • We advocate the use of CUSUM graphs as a method of quality assurance with the introduction of a robotics programme.
© 2010 THE AUTHORS; BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20880131     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09634.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience.

Authors:  Jinsung Park; Dae-Seon Yoo; Cheryn Song; Sahyun Park; Sejun Park; Seong Cheol Kim; Yongmee Cho; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Surgery: surgical quality assurance for robot-assisted prostatectomy.

Authors:  Joseph L Chin; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Real-time outcome monitoring following oesophagectomy using cumulative sum techniques.

Authors:  Geoffrey Roberts; Cheuk-Bong Tang; Mike Harvey; Sritharan Kadirkamanathan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-10-27

4.  Complications following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a prospective Canadian cohort of 305 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Andrew Fuller; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  A multi-surgeon learning curve analysis of overall and site-specific positive surgical margins after RARP and implications for training.

Authors:  Carlo Gandi; Angelo Totaro; Riccardo Bientinesi; Filippo Marino; Francesco Pierconti; Maurizio Martini; Andrea Russo; Marco Racioppi; PierFrancesco Bassi; Emilio Sacco
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-02-28

6.  Frequency of positive surgical margin at prostatectomy and its effect on patient outcome.

Authors:  Kenneth A Iczkowski; M Scott Lucia
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-06-09

7.  Strategies to optimize the performance of Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  N Lambrou; R E Diaz; P Hinoul; D Parris; K Shoemaker; A Yoo; M Schwiers
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2014

Review 8.  Systematic methods for measuring outcomes: How they may be used to improve outcomes after Radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Khurram M Siddiqui; Jonathan I Izawa
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-03-29

9.  Learning curve analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: initial experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Ga Won Yim; Sang Wun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  The comparison of surgical outcomes and learning curves of radical hysterectomy by laparoscopy and robotic system for cervical cancer: an experience of a single surgeon.

Authors:  Yoon Jung Heo; Seongmin Kim; Kyung Jin Min; Sanghoon Lee; Jin Hwa Hong; Jae Kwan Lee; Nak Woo Lee; Jae Yun Song
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-06-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.