Literature DB >> 20880023

Predation is associated with variation in colour pattern, but not body shape or colour reflectance, in a rainbowfish (Melanotaenia australis).

Michael J Young1, Leigh W Simmons, Jonathan P Evans.   

Abstract

1. In freshwater fishes, inter-population variation in male phenotype is often associated with differences in predation intensity, but these effects can be difficult to disentangle from environmental influences. 2. The western rainbowfish Melanotaenia australis exhibits marked sexual dimorphism - females are plain with a slender body, while males have striking coloration and are deeper in the body. Male traits differ in expression among populations, but this has not been described or explored in the literature. 3. This paper describes a study designed to test for geographic structuring of male phenotype in M. australis and to determine whether between-population variation in male phenotype is attributable to variation in predation regime, after accounting for environment. 4. We collected data describing habitat, and the size, activity and abundance of predators at sites containing M. australis populations. We then used photography, spectrometry and geometric morphometrics to describe colour pattern, spectral reflectance and body shape in males from these populations. Finally, we used permutation-based multivariate statistics to partition variance in these traits according to environment and predation regime. 5. Downstream environments posed higher predation risk to M. australis. Furthermore, males from these sites consistently exhibited larger cheek spots and fewer coloured lateral stripes than those from upstream sites. Variation in predation regime accounted for a significant proportion of the total variance in these traits (30·9%), after controlling for the effects of environment. 6. Variation in predation regime did not explain variation in reflectance or shape. Environmental variation, however, explained a significant portion of the total variance in reflectance (74·9%), and there was a strong trend towards it explaining a portion of the total variance in body shape (34·9%). 7. We conclude that natural selection by predators may be an important determinant of the evolution of colour pattern variation in M. australis, but not of that of body shape or colour reflectance. 8. Further study of M. australis will complement existing models, which show complex relationships between predation regime, environment and phenotype. Understanding these relationships is prerequisite to predicting the evolution of phenotypic variation in natural systems.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20880023     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01759.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  8 in total

1.  Visual habitat geometry predicts relative morph abundance in the colour-polymorphic ornate rainbowfish.

Authors:  Daniel Hancox; Robbie S Wilson; Craig R White
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Phenotypic assortment by body shape in wild-caught fish shoals.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kelley; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2018-08-30

3.  Linearisation of RGB camera responses for quantitative image analysis of visible and UV photography: a comparison of two techniques.

Authors:  Jair E Garcia; Adrian G Dyer; Andrew D Greentree; Gale Spring; Philip A Wilksch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Linking stream ecology with morphological variability in a native freshwater fish from semi-arid Australia.

Authors:  Samantha Lostrom; Jonathan P Evans; Pauline F Grierson; Shaun P Collin; Peter M Davies; Jennifer L Kelley
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Flower colours through the lens: quantitative measurement with visible and ultraviolet digital photography.

Authors:  Jair E Garcia; Andrew D Greentree; Mani Shrestha; Alan Dorin; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Shape variation in the least killifish: ecological associations of phenotypic variation and the effects of a common garden.

Authors:  J Alex Landy; Joseph Travis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Conflict between background matching and social signalling in a colour-changing freshwater fish.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kelley; Gwendolen M Rodgers; Lesley J Morrell
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Morphological plasticity in a native freshwater fish from semiarid Australia in response to variable water flows.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kelley; Peter M Davies; Shaun P Collin; Pauline F Grierson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.