Literature DB >> 20879602

Adaptive learning for relevance feedback: application to digital mammography.

Jung Hun Oh1, Yongyi Yang, Issam El Naqa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: With the rapid growing volume of images in medical databases, development of efficient image retrieval systems to retrieve relevant or similar images to a query image has become an active research area. Despite many efforts to improve the performance of techniques for accurate image retrieval, its success in biomedicine thus far has been quite limited. This article presents an adaptive content-based image retrieval (CBIR) system for improving the performance of image retrieval in mammographic databases.
METHODS: In this work, the authors propose a new relevance feedback approach based on incremental learning with support vector machine (SVM) regression. Also, the authors present a new local perturbation method to further improve the performance of the proposed relevance feedback system. The approaches enable efficient online learning by adapting the current trained model to changes prompted by the user's relevance feedback, avoiding the burden of retraining the CBIR system. To demonstrate the proposed image retrieval system, the authors used two mammogram data sets: A set of 76 mammograms scored based on geometrical similarity and a larger set of 200 mammograms scored by expert radiologists based on pathological findings.
RESULTS: The experimental results show that the proposed relevance feedback strategy improves the retrieval precision for both data sets while achieving high efficiency compared to offline SVM. For the data set of 200 mammograms, the authors obtained an average precision of 0.48 and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.79. In addition, using the same database, the authors achieved a high pathology matching rate greater than 80% between the query and the top retrieved images after relevance feedback.
CONCLUSIONS: Using mammographic databases, the results demonstrate that the proposed approach is more accurate than the model without using relevance feedback not only in image retrieval but also in pathology matching while maintaining its effectiveness for online relevance feedback applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20879602      PMCID: PMC2927692          DOI: 10.1118/1.3460839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  19 in total

1.  Dependence of computer classification of clustered microcalcifications on the correct detection of microcalcifications.

Authors:  Y Jiang; R M Nishikawa; J Papaioannou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Content-based image retrieval in picture archiving and communications systems.

Authors:  H Qi; W E Snyder
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography.

Authors:  Issam El-Naqa; Yongyi Yang; Nikolas P Galatsanos; Robert M Nishikawa; Miles N Wernick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Asymmetric bagging and random subspace for support vector machines-based relevance feedback in image retrieval.

Authors:  Dacheng Tao; Xiaoou Tang; Xuelong Li; Xindong Wu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  Content-based retrieval of mammograms using visual features related to breast density patterns.

Authors:  Sérgio Koodi Kinoshita; Paulo Mazzoncini de Azevedo-Marques; Roberto Rodrigues Pereira; Jośe Antônio Heisinger Rodrigues; Rangaraj Mandayam Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  A general regression neural network.

Authors:  D F Specht
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  1991

7.  Evaluating the effect of image preprocessing on an information-theoretic CAD system in mammography.

Authors:  Georgia D Tourassi; Robert Ike; Swatee Singh; Brian Harrawood
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.

Authors:  H P Chan; B Sahiner; K L Lam; N Petrick; M A Helvie; M M Goodsitt; D D Adler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Voice-activated retrieval of mammography reference images.

Authors:  H A Swett; P G Mutalik; V P Neklesa; L Horvath; C Lee; J Richter; I Tocino; P R Fisher
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Investigation of the support vector machine algorithm to predict lung radiation-induced pneumonitis.

Authors:  Shifeng Chen; Sumin Zhou; Fang-Fang Yin; Lawrence B Marks; Shiva K Das
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Automatic medical image annotation and keyword-based image retrieval using relevance feedback.

Authors:  Byoung Chul Ko; JiHyeon Lee; Jae-Yeal Nam
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Representation of lesion similarity by use of multidimensional scaling for breast masses on mammograms.

Authors:  Chisako Muramatsu; Kohei Nishimura; Tokiko Endo; Mikinao Oiwa; Misaki Shiraiwa; Kunio Doi; Hiroshi Fujita
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  A novel similarity learning method via relative comparison for content-based medical image retrieval.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Peng Zhang; Min Wan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  Overview on subjective similarity of images for content-based medical image retrieval.

Authors:  Chisako Muramatsu
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-05-08

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence: reshaping the practice of radiological sciences in the 21st century.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Masoom A Haider; Maryellen L Giger; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Breast Cancer Segmentation Methods: Current Status and Future Potentials.

Authors:  Epimack Michael; He Ma; Hong Li; Frank Kulwa; Jing Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.