BACKGROUND: Androgen receptor (AR) antagonists are part of the standard of care for prostate cancer. Despite the almost inevitable development of resistance in prostate tumors to AR antagonists, no new AR antagonists have been approved for over a decade. Treatment failure is due in part to mutations that increase activity of AR in response to lower ligand concentrations as well as to mutations that result in AR response to a broader range of ligands. The failure to discover new AR antagonists has occurred in the face of continued research; to enable progress, a clear understanding of the reasons for failure is required. METHODS: Non-clinical drug safety studies and safety pharmacology assays were performed on previously approved AR antagonists (bicalutamide, flutamide, nilutamide), next generation antagonists in clinical testing (MDV3100, BMS-641988), and a pre-clinical drug candidate (BMS-501949). In addition, non-clinical studies with AR mutant mice, and EEG recordings in rats were performed. Non-clinical findings are compared to disclosures of clinical trial results. RESULTS: As a drug class, AR antagonists cause seizure in animals by an off-target mechanism and are found in vitro to inhibit GABA-A currents. Clinical trials of candidate next generation AR antagonists identify seizure as a clinical safety risk. CONCLUSIONS: Non-clinical drug safety profiles of the AR antagonist drug class create a significant barrier to the identification of next generation AR antagonists. GABA-A inhibition is a common off-target activity of approved and next generation AR antagonists potentially explaining some side effects and safety hazards of this class of drugs.
BACKGROUND:Androgen receptor (AR) antagonists are part of the standard of care for prostate cancer. Despite the almost inevitable development of resistance in prostate tumors to AR antagonists, no new AR antagonists have been approved for over a decade. Treatment failure is due in part to mutations that increase activity of AR in response to lower ligand concentrations as well as to mutations that result in AR response to a broader range of ligands. The failure to discover new AR antagonists has occurred in the face of continued research; to enable progress, a clear understanding of the reasons for failure is required. METHODS: Non-clinical drug safety studies and safety pharmacology assays were performed on previously approved AR antagonists (bicalutamide, flutamide, nilutamide), next generation antagonists in clinical testing (MDV3100, BMS-641988), and a pre-clinical drug candidate (BMS-501949). In addition, non-clinical studies with AR mutant mice, and EEG recordings in rats were performed. Non-clinical findings are compared to disclosures of clinical trial results. RESULTS: As a drug class, AR antagonists cause seizure in animals by an off-target mechanism and are found in vitro to inhibit GABA-A currents. Clinical trials of candidate next generation AR antagonists identify seizure as a clinical safety risk. CONCLUSIONS: Non-clinical drug safety profiles of the AR antagonist drug class create a significant barrier to the identification of next generation AR antagonists. GABA-A inhibition is a common off-target activity of approved and next generation AR antagonists potentially explaining some side effects and safety hazards of this class of drugs.
Authors: Dana E Rathkopf; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Neal D Shore; Ronald F Tutrone; Joshi J Alumkal; Charles J Ryan; Mansoor Saleh; Ralph J Hauke; Rajesh Bandekar; Edna Chow Maneval; Carla J de Boer; Margaret K Yu; Howard I Scher Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Camila R Consiglio; Olga Udartseva; Kimberly D Ramsey; Chioma Bush; Sandra O Gollnick Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2020-07-13 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Nicola J Clegg; John Wongvipat; James D Joseph; Chris Tran; Samedy Ouk; Anna Dilhas; Yu Chen; Kate Grillot; Eric D Bischoff; Ling Cai; Anna Aparicio; Steven Dorow; Vivek Arora; Gang Shao; Jing Qian; Hong Zhao; Guangbin Yang; Chunyan Cao; John Sensintaffar; Teresa Wasielewska; Mark R Herbert; Celine Bonnefous; Beatrice Darimont; Howard I Scher; Peter Smith-Jones; Mark Klang; Nicholas D Smith; Elisa De Stanchina; Nian Wu; Ouathek Ouerfelli; Peter J Rix; Richard A Heyman; Michael E Jung; Charles L Sawyers; Jeffrey H Hager Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Susan Slovin; William Clark; Joan Carles; Andrew Krivoshik; Jung Wook Park; Fong Wang; Daniel George Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 31.777