Literature DB >> 20878871

The preferences and experiences of different bisphosphonate treatments in women with breast cancer.

L Fallowfield1, J Stebbing, J Braybrooke, C Langridge, V Jenkins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine women's experiences with oral and intravenous (i.v.) bisphosphonate therapy, the impact that treatment had on bone pain and Quality of Life (QoL), and their preferences if choice were available between oral and i.v. administration.
METHODS: This was a prospective study of women with metastatic breast cancer receiving either oral or i.v. bisphosphonate therapy. Semi-structured interview techniques and QoL questionnaires were employed. Participants in the study were interviewed three times, once in person and twice by telephone.
RESULTS: A total of 79 patients from eight UK hospitals participated in the study; 35 were receiving oral bisphosphonate medication and 44 i.v. treatments. Self-reported adherence to oral therapy was good although 21% had chosen not to take their drugs at some time. Most had adapted their lifestyle to accommodate oral therapy with 29/37(74%) completely satisfied. However 9/37(24%) expressed dissatisfaction with constraints especially the time required to stand upright after taking their tablets. By 6 months 23/25 (91%) of patients receiving (i.v.) therapies were generally satisfied with the frequency and 22/25 (88%) with the convenience especially if given concurrently with chemotherapy. Overall 25/54 (46%) patients reported improved bone pain scores on the validated FACT-BP scale from baseline to 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Both oral and i.v. therapies have disadvantages but were acceptable to most patients some of whom had reduced bone pain over time. More data regarding acceptability, adherence, and patients' preference for bisphosphonate therapies are required. Until randomised trials demonstrate superior efficacy for one mode of bisphosphonate therapy over another, we suggest offering patients a choice of bisphosphonate therapy.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20878871     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  5 in total

1.  Adjuvant bisphosphonate use in patients with early stage breast cancer: Patient perspectives on treatment acceptability and potential de-escalation.

Authors:  Sharon McGee; Mashari AlZahrani; Carol Stober; Terry L Ng; Katherine Cole; Gail Larocque; Arif Awan; Sandeep Sehdev; John Hilton; Lisa Vandermeer; Brian Hutton; Gregory Pond; Deanna Saunders; Mark Clemons
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.072

2.  Improving management of patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Lawrence Drudge-Coates
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 3.  Patient-reported preferences for oral versus intravenous administration for the treatment of cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Daniel Eek; Meaghan Krohe; Iyar Mazar; Alison Horsfield; Farrah Pompilus; Rachel Friebe; Alan L Shields
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Effects of de-escalated bisphosphonate therapy on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Pain, Brief Pain Inventory and bone biomarkers.

Authors:  Iryna Kuchuk; Jennifer L Beaumont; Mark Clemons; Eitan Amir; Christina L Addison; David Cella
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 4.072

5.  Compliance and patient reported toxicity from oral adjuvant bisphosphonates in patients with early breast cancer. A cross sectional study.

Authors:  C Wilson; C Martin; M C Winter
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.072

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.