Literature DB >> 20878855

Understanding normality: a qualitative analysis of breast cancer patients concepts of normality after mastectomy and reconstructive surgery.

Sarah Denford1, D Harcourt, L Rubin, A Pusic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As survival rates increase, many people have to adjust to life after cancer. This includes adjusting to life after surgery. While previous research suggests that patients commonly strive to be 'normal' after mastectomy and reconstructive surgery, research surrounding individual perceptions of normality is lacking. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore concepts of normality within a sample of breast cancer patients eligible for reconstructive surgery following mastectomy.
METHODS: A total of 35 semi structured interviews, with women who had undergone or were about to undergo breast reconstructive surgery following breast cancer, were analysed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Four main themes emerged from the data. Women referred to looking normal (appearance); being able to fulfil everyday activities (behaviour); adapting to a new normal (reconstructing normality); and not being ill (health). The importance placed on each area of normality differed between patients. Additionally, patients used different standards to anchor concepts of normality. These included individual standards, social standards and clinical standards. DISCUSSION: The results indicate that although there are commonalities between patients' concepts of normality, it is important for health care professionals to recognise potential individual differences. This may usefully aid communication and help to manage expectations among patients considering surgical options.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20878855     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  16 in total

1.  Working Toward Normalcy Post-Treatment: A Qualitative Study of Older Adult Breast and Prostate Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Rachel Walker; Sarah L Szanton; Jennifer Wenzel
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  The Making of Breasts: Navigating the Symbolism of Breasts in Women Facing Cancer.

Authors:  Carmen Webb; Natalie Jacox; Claire Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  Spiritual well-being in long-term colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies.

Authors:  Joanna Bulkley; Carmit K McMullen; Mark C Hornbrook; Marcia Grant; Andrea Altschuler; Christopher S Wendel; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  'Use what God has given me': difference and disparity in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Lisa R Rubin; Jessica Chavez; Amy Alderman; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2013-04-05

Review 5.  Psychological Aspects of Breast Reconstruction after Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Anna Pittermann; Christine Radtke
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Indocyanine green angiography for preventing postoperative mastectomy skin flap necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Tim Pruimboom; Rutger M Schols; Sander Mj Van Kuijk; René Rwj Van der Hulst; Shan S Qiu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-22

7.  Empowered Choices: African-American Women's Breast Reconstruction Decisions.

Authors:  Shahnjayla K Connors; Isabel Martinez Leal; Vijay Nitturi; Chisom N Iwundu; Valentina Maza; Stacey Reyes; Chiara Acquati; Lorraine R Reitzel
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2021-03-01

8.  Attitudes and Decisional Conflict Regarding Breast Reconstruction Among Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Neal Topham; Laurie Kirstein; Shannon Myers Virtue; Kristin Brill; Katie A Devine; Tina Gajda; Sara Frederick; Katie Darabos; Kristen Sorice
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.760

9.  The acceptability of PEGASUS: an intervention to facilitate shared decision-making with women contemplating breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Diana Harcourt; Catrin Griffiths; Elisabeth Baker; Esther Hansen; Paul White; Alex Clarke
Journal:  Psychol Health Med       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Work and "mass personal" communication as means of navigating nutrition and exercise concerns in an online cancer community.

Authors:  Brad Love; Charee M Thompson; Brittani Crook; Erin Donovan-Kicken
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.