BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Oral mesalazine formulations are effective in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis (UC). It is not clear what induction dose of mesalazine is optimal for treating patients with active UC. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4 versus 2.25 g/day for selected patients with active UC. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical study in 39 Japanese medical institutions. A total of 123 patients with moderately active UC received 4 g/day (two divided doses) versus 2.25 g/day (three divided doses) for 8 weeks. Primary endpoint was the ulcerative colitis-disease activity index (UC-DAI) score before and after 8 weeks of treatment. The improvement of each individual UC-DAI variable, remission, and efficacy rates were secondary endpoints. Safety was determined by laboratory data, vital signs, subjective symptoms, and objective findings. RESULTS: Patients receiving 4 g/day achieved a change in UC-DAI score significantly superior to those receiving 2.25 g/day [-3.0 (95% confidence intervals (CI) -3.8 to -2.3) vs. -0.8 (95% CI -1.8 to 0.1), respectively]. There were significant differences in all UC-DAI variables between the groups. Remission rates were 22.0% (4 g/day) and 15.3% (2.25 g/day). The efficacy rate was significantly better with 4 versus 2.25 g/day [76.3 vs. 45.8%, respectively (95% CI 13.8-47.2); P = 0.001]. No difference was seen in adverse events or adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS: A dose of 4 g/day was significantly superior to 2.25 g/day in terms of UC-DAI score for patients with moderately active UC. Safety profiles were similar for both doses.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Oral mesalazine formulations are effective in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis (UC). It is not clear what induction dose of mesalazine is optimal for treating patients with active UC. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4 versus 2.25 g/day for selected patients with active UC. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical study in 39 Japanese medical institutions. A total of 123 patients with moderately active UC received 4 g/day (two divided doses) versus 2.25 g/day (three divided doses) for 8 weeks. Primary endpoint was the ulcerative colitis-disease activity index (UC-DAI) score before and after 8 weeks of treatment. The improvement of each individual UC-DAI variable, remission, and efficacy rates were secondary endpoints. Safety was determined by laboratory data, vital signs, subjective symptoms, and objective findings. RESULTS:Patients receiving 4 g/day achieved a change in UC-DAI score significantly superior to those receiving 2.25 g/day [-3.0 (95% confidence intervals (CI) -3.8 to -2.3) vs. -0.8 (95% CI -1.8 to 0.1), respectively]. There were significant differences in all UC-DAI variables between the groups. Remission rates were 22.0% (4 g/day) and 15.3% (2.25 g/day). The efficacy rate was significantly better with 4 versus 2.25 g/day [76.3 vs. 45.8%, respectively (95% CI 13.8-47.2); P = 0.001]. No difference was seen in adverse events or adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS: A dose of 4 g/day was significantly superior to 2.25 g/day in terms of UC-DAI score for patients with moderately active UC. Safety profiles were similar for both doses.
Authors: P G Farup; T A Hinterleitner; M Lukás; X Hébuterne; D Rachmilewitz; M Campieri; R Meier; R Keller; B Rathbone; E Oddsson Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: L R Sutherland; F Martin; S Greer; M Robinson; N Greenberger; F Saibil; T Martin; J Sparr; E Prokipchuk; L Borgen Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1987-06 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Cynthia W Ko; Siddharth Singh; Joseph D Feuerstein; Corinna Falck-Ytter; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Raymond K Cross Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Reidar Fossmark; Maya Olaisen; Tom Christian Martinsen; Hans Olav Melberg Journal: Therap Adv Gastroenterol Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 4.409