Bettina-Maria Taute1, Hannes Melnyk, Hubert Podhaisky. 1. Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III, Schwerpunkt Angiologie, Universitätsklinikum der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany. bettina.taute@medizin.uni-halle.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Unclear extremity complaints are common symptoms of inpatients. In a subset of these patients, a clinical suspicion of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) results; this needs to be quickly and definitively clarified by a vascular physician. The question arose of how often a clinical suspicion of DVT was confirmed in an inpatient population and which alternative diagnoses were able to be made by angiologists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, all inpatients in the Angiologic Vascular Diagnostics Center of the University Hospital Halle, Germany, examined in 2007 for a suspicion of DVT were evaluated with respect to the definitively made diagnosis. RESULTS: In 213 (28.6%) of 745 suspected cases of DVT, a DVT was confirmed. In 532 patients (71.4%), DVT was excluded. In 314 of these patients, 436 alternative diagnoses were recorded in the diagnostic reports of angiologic examinations. In 38.6% (n = 168), other venous causes could be confirmed as the most common alternative diagnosis. There were chronic venous diseases in 28% (n = 122), superficial thrombophlebitis (n = 27), and tumor-related pelvic vein compression (n = 19). 17.4% (n = 76) exhibited lymphedema. In 13.3% (n = 58), a generalized edema was diagnosed. Arthrogenic causes followed with 12.8% (n = 56). Lipedema (5.3%) and hematoma (5%) could be verified as other important differential diagnoses. Rare causes were symptomatic or ruptured Baker's cysts (2.5%), erysipelas (2.5%), abscess, aneurysm, muscle tears, and tumors. CONCLUSION: The variety of alternative diagnoses in patients with clinical suspicion of DVT is high. The knowledge and systematic examination of potential, even rare differential diagnoses after exclusion of DVT are part of the repertoire of the vascular physician. Unnecessary and expensive, as well as onerous, diagnostic procedures on the patient can be avoided. Anticoagulation that was begun as a result of the suspicion of DVT can quickly be stopped.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Unclear extremity complaints are common symptoms of inpatients. In a subset of these patients, a clinical suspicion of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) results; this needs to be quickly and definitively clarified by a vascular physician. The question arose of how often a clinical suspicion of DVT was confirmed in an inpatient population and which alternative diagnoses were able to be made by angiologists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, all inpatients in the Angiologic Vascular Diagnostics Center of the University Hospital Halle, Germany, examined in 2007 for a suspicion of DVT were evaluated with respect to the definitively made diagnosis. RESULTS: In 213 (28.6%) of 745 suspected cases of DVT, a DVT was confirmed. In 532 patients (71.4%), DVT was excluded. In 314 of these patients, 436 alternative diagnoses were recorded in the diagnostic reports of angiologic examinations. In 38.6% (n = 168), other venous causes could be confirmed as the most common alternative diagnosis. There were chronic venous diseases in 28% (n = 122), superficial thrombophlebitis (n = 27), and tumor-related pelvic vein compression (n = 19). 17.4% (n = 76) exhibited lymphedema. In 13.3% (n = 58), a generalized edema was diagnosed. Arthrogenic causes followed with 12.8% (n = 56). Lipedema (5.3%) and hematoma (5%) could be verified as other important differential diagnoses. Rare causes were symptomatic or ruptured Baker's cysts (2.5%), erysipelas (2.5%), abscess, aneurysm, muscle tears, and tumors. CONCLUSION: The variety of alternative diagnoses in patients with clinical suspicion of DVT is high. The knowledge and systematic examination of potential, even rare differential diagnoses after exclusion of DVT are part of the repertoire of the vascular physician. Unnecessary and expensive, as well as onerous, diagnostic procedures on the patient can be avoided. Anticoagulation that was begun as a result of the suspicion of DVT can quickly be stopped.
Authors: Paul D Stein; Afzal Beemath; Frederick A Meyers; Elias Skaf; Julia Sanchez; Ronald E Olson Journal: Am J Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Philip S Wells; David R Anderson; Marc Rodger; Melissa Forgie; Clive Kearon; Jonathan Dreyer; George Kovacs; Michael Mitchell; Bernard Lewandowski; Michael J Kovacs Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-09-25 Impact factor: 91.245