Literature DB >> 20877164

The validity of mass body temperature screening with ear thermometers in a warm thermal environment.

Tatsuhiko Suzuki1, Koji Wada, Yuko Wada, Hideaki Kagitani, Tetsuya Arioka, Koji Maeda, Kenichi Kida.   

Abstract

Identification of people who have a fever in public places during the occurrence of emerging infectious diseases is essential for controlling disease spread. The measurement of body temperature could identify infected persons. The environment affects body temperature, but little is known about the validity of measurements under different thermal environments. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the validity of measuring body temperature in cold and warm environments. We recruited 50 participants aged 18-69 years (26 males, 24 females) to measure body temperature using an axillary thermometer and an ear thermometer and by infrared thermal imaging (thermography). The body temperature obtained with an axillary thermometer was used as a reference; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine the validity of temperatures obtained by measurement with an ear thermometer and thermography at 36.7°C (median of the axillary body temperature). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) indicates the validity of measurements. The AUC for ear thermometers in a warm environment (mean temperature: 20.0°C) showed a fair accuracy (AUC: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.64-0.83]), while that (AUC: 0.62 [95% CI: 0.51-0.72]) in a cold environment (mean temperature: 12.6°C) and measurements with thermography used in both environments (AUC: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.45-0.68] in a warm environment and AUC: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.54-0.76] in a cold environment) showed a low accuracy. In conclusion, in a warm environment, measurement of body temperature with an ear thermometer is a valid procedure and effective for mass body temperature screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20877164     DOI: 10.1620/tjem.222.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med        ISSN: 0040-8727            Impact factor:   1.848


  5 in total

1.  Utility of thermal image scanning in screening for febrile patients in cold climates.

Authors:  Takuya Ogawa; Yukinori Tsukuda; Yuki Suzuki; Shigeto Hiratsuka; Ryo Inoue; Norimasa Iwasaki
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 1.805

2.  Fever screening during the influenza (H1N1-2009) pandemic at Narita International Airport, Japan.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nishiura; Kazuko Kamiya
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.090

3.  Hearables: New Perspectives and Pitfalls of In-Ear Devices for Physiological Monitoring. A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Michela Masè; Alessandro Micarelli; Giacomo Strapazzon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 4.  Review of the efficacy of infrared thermography for screening infectious diseases with applications to COVID-19.

Authors:  Kosar Khaksari; Thien Nguyen; Brian Hill; Timothy Quang; John Perreault; Viswanath Gorti; Ravi Malpani; Emily Blick; Tomás González Cano; Babak Shadgan; Amir H Gandjbakhche
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-03-25

5.  Usefulness of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometer for Early Neonatal Period Using Bland-Altman Analysis.

Authors:  Saori Sugawara; George Imataka; Shigemi Yoshihara
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.429

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.